红掌(天南星科)的剖面分类分析:红掌属群及其诊断形态与1属分子系统发育的比较

IF 1.1 3区 生物学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES
M. Carlsen, T. Croat
{"title":"红掌(天南星科)的剖面分类分析:红掌属群及其诊断形态与1属分子系统发育的比较","authors":"M. Carlsen, T. Croat","doi":"10.3417/2018215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \n This study presents an evaluation of the currently accepted sectional classification of the genus Anthurium Schott (Araceae) in light of a recently published molecular phylogeny for the group. In general, disagreements between these two occur because many diagnostic morphological characters used in the sectional classification turned out to be highly homoplasious within Anthurium, with multiple independent gains or losses of seemingly similar morphologies in distantly related clades. A new sectional classification of Anthurium that more accurately represents species relationships and the evolutionary history of the genus is much needed, and here we propose the first steps toward it. Results from this study suggest that out of the 18 sections and two series recognized in Anthurium, only seven of these groups are monophyletic (i.e., sections Andiphilum (Schott) Croat, Calomystrium (Schott) Engl., Dactylophyllium (Schott) Engl., Leptanthurium (Schott) Engl., Polyphyllium Engl., Tetraspermium (Schott) Engl., and the newly recognized section Multinervia (Croat) Carlsen & Croat, previously a series within section Pachyneurium (Schott) Engl.). All other sections are either not monophyletic or their monophyly could not be accurately tested. A complete revision of the sectional classification of Anthurium will require a more comprehensive taxon sampling and a better supported molecular phylogeny.","PeriodicalId":55510,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden","volume":"104 1","pages":"69 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis of the Sectional Classification of Anthurium (Araceae): Comparing Infrageneric Groupings and their Diagnostic Morphology with a Molecular Phylogeny of the Genus1\",\"authors\":\"M. Carlsen, T. Croat\",\"doi\":\"10.3417/2018215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\n This study presents an evaluation of the currently accepted sectional classification of the genus Anthurium Schott (Araceae) in light of a recently published molecular phylogeny for the group. In general, disagreements between these two occur because many diagnostic morphological characters used in the sectional classification turned out to be highly homoplasious within Anthurium, with multiple independent gains or losses of seemingly similar morphologies in distantly related clades. A new sectional classification of Anthurium that more accurately represents species relationships and the evolutionary history of the genus is much needed, and here we propose the first steps toward it. Results from this study suggest that out of the 18 sections and two series recognized in Anthurium, only seven of these groups are monophyletic (i.e., sections Andiphilum (Schott) Croat, Calomystrium (Schott) Engl., Dactylophyllium (Schott) Engl., Leptanthurium (Schott) Engl., Polyphyllium Engl., Tetraspermium (Schott) Engl., and the newly recognized section Multinervia (Croat) Carlsen & Croat, previously a series within section Pachyneurium (Schott) Engl.). All other sections are either not monophyletic or their monophyly could not be accurately tested. A complete revision of the sectional classification of Anthurium will require a more comprehensive taxon sampling and a better supported molecular phylogeny.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"69 - 82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3417/2018215\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3417/2018215","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

摘要本研究根据最近发表的天南星科红掌属的分子系统发育学,对目前公认的该属的分区分类进行了评估。总的来说,这两者之间的分歧是因为在部分分类中使用的许多诊断形态学特征在红掌中被证明是高度同源的,在远缘分支中有多个看似相似的形态的独立增益或损失。非常需要一种更准确地代表物种关系和属进化史的新的红掌科分类,在这里我们提出了实现这一分类的第一步。这项研究的结果表明,在红掌科中识别的18个科和两个系列中,只有7个是单系的(即Andiphilum(Schott)Croat科,Calomystrium(Schott)Engl。,Dactylophyllium(Schott)Engl。,Leptonthurium(Schott)Engl。,Polyphellium Engl。,Tetraspermium(Schott)Engl。,以及新承认的多神经(Croat)Carlsen&Croat部分,之前是Pachyneurium(Schott)Engl部分内的一个系列)。所有其他部分要么不是单系的,要么它们的单系性无法准确测试。对红掌属的分区分类进行全面修订将需要更全面的分类单元采样和更好的分子系统发育支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Analysis of the Sectional Classification of Anthurium (Araceae): Comparing Infrageneric Groupings and their Diagnostic Morphology with a Molecular Phylogeny of the Genus1
Abstract This study presents an evaluation of the currently accepted sectional classification of the genus Anthurium Schott (Araceae) in light of a recently published molecular phylogeny for the group. In general, disagreements between these two occur because many diagnostic morphological characters used in the sectional classification turned out to be highly homoplasious within Anthurium, with multiple independent gains or losses of seemingly similar morphologies in distantly related clades. A new sectional classification of Anthurium that more accurately represents species relationships and the evolutionary history of the genus is much needed, and here we propose the first steps toward it. Results from this study suggest that out of the 18 sections and two series recognized in Anthurium, only seven of these groups are monophyletic (i.e., sections Andiphilum (Schott) Croat, Calomystrium (Schott) Engl., Dactylophyllium (Schott) Engl., Leptanthurium (Schott) Engl., Polyphyllium Engl., Tetraspermium (Schott) Engl., and the newly recognized section Multinervia (Croat) Carlsen & Croat, previously a series within section Pachyneurium (Schott) Engl.). All other sections are either not monophyletic or their monophyly could not be accurately tested. A complete revision of the sectional classification of Anthurium will require a more comprehensive taxon sampling and a better supported molecular phylogeny.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden is a quarterly international journal primarily devoted to systematic botany and evolutionary biology. We encourage submissions of original papers dealing with significant advances in the taxonomy, phylogeny, biogeography, paleobiology, and evolution of plants, and in conservation genetics and biology, restoration ecology, and ethnobiology, using morphological and/or molecular characters, field observations, and/or database information. We also welcome reviews and papers on conceptual issues and new methodologies in systematics. Important floristic works will also be considered. Symposium proceedings discussing a broader range of topical biological subjects are also published, typically once a year. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed by qualified and independent reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信