加拿大统计局和欧盟统计局对伊朗主要劳动力指标变化的方差估计方法的调整

Q3 Decision Sciences
Lida Kalhori Nadrabadi, F. Mehran, Mohammed Reza Reyhani, Roshanak Aliakbari Saba
{"title":"加拿大统计局和欧盟统计局对伊朗主要劳动力指标变化的方差估计方法的调整","authors":"Lida Kalhori Nadrabadi, F. Mehran, Mohammed Reza Reyhani, Roshanak Aliakbari Saba","doi":"10.3233/sji-220095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The changing values of the indicators obtained from national labour force surveys provide analysts and planners with valuable information on the fluctuations of the labour market of the country. Labour force surveys in many countries follow the standards established by the International Labour Organization, and, as a result, tend to be similar in various respects. Given these similarities, the procedures used by the statistical organizations of Canada and the European Union are examined in this paper for the development of variance estimates of changes of the labour force indicators in Iran. While the survey in Iran and those in the countries under study have many similarities, they also differ in certain respects, namely, in terms of the periodicity of the survey, the rotation pattern as well as the unit of rotation, and the possible existence of non-response among the primary sampling units. Here, first, the methodologies of Statistics Canada and Eurostat are modified and adapted to the particularities of the labour force survey in Iran. Then, the results are compared. Among the four methods examined, the bootstrap methodology of Statistics Canada, after some modifications and adaptations, is found to be especially suitable for application in the labour force survey of Iran and, perhaps, in other counties with similar conditions. The proposed methodology can, particularly well, take into account the impact of the various steps of weight calculations on the variance estimates of change of the main labour force indicators.","PeriodicalId":55877,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Journal of the IAOS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptation of Statistics Canada and Eurostat methodologies for variance estimation of changes of the main labour force indicators in Iran\",\"authors\":\"Lida Kalhori Nadrabadi, F. Mehran, Mohammed Reza Reyhani, Roshanak Aliakbari Saba\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/sji-220095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The changing values of the indicators obtained from national labour force surveys provide analysts and planners with valuable information on the fluctuations of the labour market of the country. Labour force surveys in many countries follow the standards established by the International Labour Organization, and, as a result, tend to be similar in various respects. Given these similarities, the procedures used by the statistical organizations of Canada and the European Union are examined in this paper for the development of variance estimates of changes of the labour force indicators in Iran. While the survey in Iran and those in the countries under study have many similarities, they also differ in certain respects, namely, in terms of the periodicity of the survey, the rotation pattern as well as the unit of rotation, and the possible existence of non-response among the primary sampling units. Here, first, the methodologies of Statistics Canada and Eurostat are modified and adapted to the particularities of the labour force survey in Iran. Then, the results are compared. Among the four methods examined, the bootstrap methodology of Statistics Canada, after some modifications and adaptations, is found to be especially suitable for application in the labour force survey of Iran and, perhaps, in other counties with similar conditions. The proposed methodology can, particularly well, take into account the impact of the various steps of weight calculations on the variance estimates of change of the main labour force indicators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical Journal of the IAOS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical Journal of the IAOS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/sji-220095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Journal of the IAOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/sji-220095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从国家劳动力调查中获得的指标值不断变化,为分析人员和规划者提供了有关该国劳动力市场波动的宝贵信息。许多国家的劳动力调查遵循国际劳工组织制定的标准,因此在各个方面往往相似。鉴于这些相似之处,本文审查了加拿大和欧洲联盟统计组织在制定伊朗劳动力指标变化方差估计时使用的程序。虽然伊朗的调查与所研究国家的调查有很多相似之处,但它们在某些方面也有所不同,即调查的周期性、轮换模式和轮换单位,以及主要抽样单位之间可能存在不回应的情况。首先,加拿大统计局和欧盟统计局的方法进行了修改,以适应伊朗劳动力调查的特殊性。然后,对结果进行比较。在所审查的四种方法中,加拿大统计局的引导法经过一些修改和调整后,特别适合用于伊朗的劳动力调查,也许也适用于其他条件类似的县。拟议的方法可以特别好地考虑到权重计算的各个步骤对主要劳动力指标变化的方差估计的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adaptation of Statistics Canada and Eurostat methodologies for variance estimation of changes of the main labour force indicators in Iran
The changing values of the indicators obtained from national labour force surveys provide analysts and planners with valuable information on the fluctuations of the labour market of the country. Labour force surveys in many countries follow the standards established by the International Labour Organization, and, as a result, tend to be similar in various respects. Given these similarities, the procedures used by the statistical organizations of Canada and the European Union are examined in this paper for the development of variance estimates of changes of the labour force indicators in Iran. While the survey in Iran and those in the countries under study have many similarities, they also differ in certain respects, namely, in terms of the periodicity of the survey, the rotation pattern as well as the unit of rotation, and the possible existence of non-response among the primary sampling units. Here, first, the methodologies of Statistics Canada and Eurostat are modified and adapted to the particularities of the labour force survey in Iran. Then, the results are compared. Among the four methods examined, the bootstrap methodology of Statistics Canada, after some modifications and adaptations, is found to be especially suitable for application in the labour force survey of Iran and, perhaps, in other counties with similar conditions. The proposed methodology can, particularly well, take into account the impact of the various steps of weight calculations on the variance estimates of change of the main labour force indicators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Journal of the IAOS
Statistical Journal of the IAOS Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: This is the flagship journal of the International Association for Official Statistics and is expected to be widely circulated and subscribed to by individuals and institutions in all parts of the world. The main aim of the Journal is to support the IAOS mission by publishing articles to promote the understanding and advancement of official statistics and to foster the development of effective and efficient official statistical services on a global basis. Papers are expected to be of wide interest to readers. Such papers may or may not contain strictly original material. All papers are refereed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信