局部晚期宫颈癌高剂量率近距离增强和体积弧增强治疗的剂量学比较

H. Hegazy, Neamat Hegazy, M. Soliman, A. Elsaid
{"title":"局部晚期宫颈癌高剂量率近距离增强和体积弧增强治疗的剂量学比较","authors":"H. Hegazy, Neamat Hegazy, M. Soliman, A. Elsaid","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1729480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is considered the standard treatment for the locally advanced cancer cervix (LACC). Radiotherapy is commonly administered by a three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) approach followed by brachytherapy (BT). High dose rate (HDR) BT is commonly administered; however, several drawbacks exist including invasive technique, pain, requirement of anesthesia, and operative risks. We assessed the dosimetric difference between the HDR BT and the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) boost in those patients. Ten patients were selected retrospectively with LACC and all received whole pelvis radiotherapy followed by BT boost of 7 Gy in three fractions. The computed tomography (CT) image was transferred to the Varian system for the VMAT plan while the one with the applicator was transferred to the Sagi planning system and the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and small bowel were delineate with a margin of 5 mm were added to the CTV to create the planning target volume (PTV). The D90 for the PTV in VMAT boost was lower than received by the HR-CTV in the BT boost. Mean volume of the PTV was higher than that of the HR-CTV. The D2cc was higher in VMAT for bladder, sigmoid, and rectum while the D2cc for the small bowel in BT was higher compared with the VMAT. The VMAT is an option that exists for patients who refuse BT or cannot tolerate it, or in case of nonavailability of BT or a nonworking machine.","PeriodicalId":31357,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Oncology","volume":"07 1","pages":"085 - 088"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0041-1729480","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosimetric Comparison between High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Boost and Volumetric Arc Therapy Boost in Locally Advanced Cancer Cervix\",\"authors\":\"H. Hegazy, Neamat Hegazy, M. Soliman, A. Elsaid\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1729480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is considered the standard treatment for the locally advanced cancer cervix (LACC). Radiotherapy is commonly administered by a three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) approach followed by brachytherapy (BT). High dose rate (HDR) BT is commonly administered; however, several drawbacks exist including invasive technique, pain, requirement of anesthesia, and operative risks. We assessed the dosimetric difference between the HDR BT and the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) boost in those patients. Ten patients were selected retrospectively with LACC and all received whole pelvis radiotherapy followed by BT boost of 7 Gy in three fractions. The computed tomography (CT) image was transferred to the Varian system for the VMAT plan while the one with the applicator was transferred to the Sagi planning system and the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and small bowel were delineate with a margin of 5 mm were added to the CTV to create the planning target volume (PTV). The D90 for the PTV in VMAT boost was lower than received by the HR-CTV in the BT boost. Mean volume of the PTV was higher than that of the HR-CTV. The D2cc was higher in VMAT for bladder, sigmoid, and rectum while the D2cc for the small bowel in BT was higher compared with the VMAT. The VMAT is an option that exists for patients who refuse BT or cannot tolerate it, or in case of nonavailability of BT or a nonworking machine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Oncology\",\"volume\":\"07 1\",\"pages\":\"085 - 088\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0041-1729480\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1729480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1729480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

同步放化疗是局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)的标准治疗方法。放射治疗通常采用三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)方法,然后是近距离放射治疗(BT)。通常采用高剂量率(HDR) BT;然而,存在一些缺点,包括侵入性技术、疼痛、麻醉要求和手术风险。在这些患者中,我们评估了HDR BT和体积调节电弧治疗(VMAT)增强之间的剂量学差异。回顾性选择10例LACC患者,全部接受全骨盆放疗,并分三次进行7 Gy的BT增强。计算机断层扫描(CT)图像被转移到Varian系统进行VMAT计划,而带有涂抹器的图像被转移到Sagi计划系统,高风险临床目标体积(HR-CTV),膀胱,直肠,乙状结肠和小肠被划定,边缘为5mm,并添加到CTV以创建计划目标体积(PTV)。VMAT增压时PTV的D90比BT增压时HR-CTV的D90要低。PTV的平均容积高于HR-CTV。VMAT中膀胱、乙状结肠和直肠的D2cc高于VMAT,而BT中小肠的D2cc高于VMAT。VMAT是为拒绝BT或不能忍受BT的患者提供的一种选择,或者在BT不可用或机器不能工作的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dosimetric Comparison between High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Boost and Volumetric Arc Therapy Boost in Locally Advanced Cancer Cervix
Abstract Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is considered the standard treatment for the locally advanced cancer cervix (LACC). Radiotherapy is commonly administered by a three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) approach followed by brachytherapy (BT). High dose rate (HDR) BT is commonly administered; however, several drawbacks exist including invasive technique, pain, requirement of anesthesia, and operative risks. We assessed the dosimetric difference between the HDR BT and the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) boost in those patients. Ten patients were selected retrospectively with LACC and all received whole pelvis radiotherapy followed by BT boost of 7 Gy in three fractions. The computed tomography (CT) image was transferred to the Varian system for the VMAT plan while the one with the applicator was transferred to the Sagi planning system and the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and small bowel were delineate with a margin of 5 mm were added to the CTV to create the planning target volume (PTV). The D90 for the PTV in VMAT boost was lower than received by the HR-CTV in the BT boost. Mean volume of the PTV was higher than that of the HR-CTV. The D2cc was higher in VMAT for bladder, sigmoid, and rectum while the D2cc for the small bowel in BT was higher compared with the VMAT. The VMAT is an option that exists for patients who refuse BT or cannot tolerate it, or in case of nonavailability of BT or a nonworking machine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信