船舶融资市场的补贴政策研究

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Min-hwan Lee, Hocheol Nam
{"title":"船舶融资市场的补贴政策研究","authors":"Min-hwan Lee, Hocheol Nam","doi":"10.24006/jilt.2017.15.3.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study considers the case in which governments decide whether to support private commercial banks with a subsidy policy in order to encourage participation in the international ship financing market. We examine two cases: (i) identical efficiency between domestic and foreign commercial banks; and (ii) different efficiencies between these banks. In the first case, the domestic government has the incentive to provide a subsidy strategy for domestic commercial banks to maximize social welfare, while the foreign government does not use the subsidy support. Furthermore, in the second case, foreign governments and commercial banks always prefer the subsidy strategy in order to maximize both social welfare and profits. However, the domestic government uses the subsidy strategy depending on the efficiency gap between the two banks. Our model suggests that governments need to support commercial banks with an appropriate subsidy strategy (direct or indirect) to promote participation in the market.","PeriodicalId":36581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Logistics and Trade","volume":"15 1","pages":"102-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study of Subsidy Policy in the Ship Financing Market\",\"authors\":\"Min-hwan Lee, Hocheol Nam\",\"doi\":\"10.24006/jilt.2017.15.3.102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study considers the case in which governments decide whether to support private commercial banks with a subsidy policy in order to encourage participation in the international ship financing market. We examine two cases: (i) identical efficiency between domestic and foreign commercial banks; and (ii) different efficiencies between these banks. In the first case, the domestic government has the incentive to provide a subsidy strategy for domestic commercial banks to maximize social welfare, while the foreign government does not use the subsidy support. Furthermore, in the second case, foreign governments and commercial banks always prefer the subsidy strategy in order to maximize both social welfare and profits. However, the domestic government uses the subsidy strategy depending on the efficiency gap between the two banks. Our model suggests that governments need to support commercial banks with an appropriate subsidy strategy (direct or indirect) to promote participation in the market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Logistics and Trade\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"102-115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Logistics and Trade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24006/jilt.2017.15.3.102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Logistics and Trade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24006/jilt.2017.15.3.102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究考虑了政府决定是否通过补贴政策支持私人商业银行以鼓励参与国际船舶融资市场的情况。我们考察了两种情况:(i)国内外商业银行的效率相同;以及(ii)这些银行之间的效率不同。在第一种情况下,国内政府有动机为国内商业银行提供补贴策略,以最大限度地提高社会福利,而外国政府没有使用补贴支持。此外,在第二种情况下,外国政府和商业银行总是倾向于补贴策略,以实现社会福利和利润的最大化。然而,国内政府根据两家银行之间的效率差距使用补贴策略。我们的模型表明,政府需要通过适当的补贴策略(直接或间接)支持商业银行,以促进市场参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study of Subsidy Policy in the Ship Financing Market
This study considers the case in which governments decide whether to support private commercial banks with a subsidy policy in order to encourage participation in the international ship financing market. We examine two cases: (i) identical efficiency between domestic and foreign commercial banks; and (ii) different efficiencies between these banks. In the first case, the domestic government has the incentive to provide a subsidy strategy for domestic commercial banks to maximize social welfare, while the foreign government does not use the subsidy support. Furthermore, in the second case, foreign governments and commercial banks always prefer the subsidy strategy in order to maximize both social welfare and profits. However, the domestic government uses the subsidy strategy depending on the efficiency gap between the two banks. Our model suggests that governments need to support commercial banks with an appropriate subsidy strategy (direct or indirect) to promote participation in the market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International Logistics and Trade
Journal of International Logistics and Trade Business, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信