{"title":"鲁斯韦尔十字铭文和路之梦第58行","authors":"Leonard Neidorf","doi":"10.1080/00393274.2021.1921614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the divergence between line 58a of the text of The Dream of the Rood preserved in the Vercelli Book (tō þām æðelinge) and the corresponding verse in the text inscribed on the Ruthwell Cross (æþþilæ til anum). Scholars have tended to regard these variants as a pair of equally meritorious readings, which are metrically acceptable and contextually plausible. It is here argued, to the contrary, that the verse preserved on the Ruthwell Cross is the decidedly superior reading on account of its conformity to subtle regularities in the diction applied to Christ and his retainers. For various reasons, the verse tō þām æðelinge should be regarded as a scribal corruption of æþþilæ til anum, the anterior and superior reading.","PeriodicalId":43263,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA NEOPHILOLOGICA","volume":"93 1","pages":"333 - 340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00393274.2021.1921614","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ruthwell Cross Inscription and The Dream of the Rood line 58\",\"authors\":\"Leonard Neidorf\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00393274.2021.1921614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article examines the divergence between line 58a of the text of The Dream of the Rood preserved in the Vercelli Book (tō þām æðelinge) and the corresponding verse in the text inscribed on the Ruthwell Cross (æþþilæ til anum). Scholars have tended to regard these variants as a pair of equally meritorious readings, which are metrically acceptable and contextually plausible. It is here argued, to the contrary, that the verse preserved on the Ruthwell Cross is the decidedly superior reading on account of its conformity to subtle regularities in the diction applied to Christ and his retainers. For various reasons, the verse tō þām æðelinge should be regarded as a scribal corruption of æþþilæ til anum, the anterior and superior reading.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDIA NEOPHILOLOGICA\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"333 - 340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00393274.2021.1921614\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDIA NEOPHILOLOGICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2021.1921614\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIA NEOPHILOLOGICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2021.1921614","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本文考察了维切利书(tki þām æðelinge)中保存的《路之梦》文本的第58a行与鲁斯韦尔十字架(æþþilæ til anum)上的文本中相应的诗句之间的差异。学者们倾向于将这些变体视为一对同样有价值的解读,它们在度量上是可接受的,在语境上是可信的。与此相反,这里的论点是,保存在鲁斯韦尔十字架上的诗句显然是更好的阅读,因为它符合适用于基督和他的追随者的措辞的微妙规律。由于各种原因,这首诗tki þām æ æ elinge应该被认为是对æþþilæ til anum(前读和上读)的抄写腐化。
The Ruthwell Cross Inscription and The Dream of the Rood line 58
ABSTRACT This article examines the divergence between line 58a of the text of The Dream of the Rood preserved in the Vercelli Book (tō þām æðelinge) and the corresponding verse in the text inscribed on the Ruthwell Cross (æþþilæ til anum). Scholars have tended to regard these variants as a pair of equally meritorious readings, which are metrically acceptable and contextually plausible. It is here argued, to the contrary, that the verse preserved on the Ruthwell Cross is the decidedly superior reading on account of its conformity to subtle regularities in the diction applied to Christ and his retainers. For various reasons, the verse tō þām æðelinge should be regarded as a scribal corruption of æþþilæ til anum, the anterior and superior reading.
期刊介绍:
Studia Neophilologica publishes articles on English, German and the Romance languages and literatures, and reviews of books in these fields. The contributions represent both historically oriented research and synchronic and structural studies, and the journal is not limited to any particular linguistic or literary period. Many articles concern methodological questions within the fields of general linguistics and literary theory. The majority of the contributions, however, investigate specific linguistic problems or deal with specific literary texts.