COVID-19对马来西亚合同义务的影响

Q3 Social Sciences
Tan Kheng Aik, DR. Pardis MOSLEMZADEH TEHRANI
{"title":"COVID-19对马来西亚合同义务的影响","authors":"Tan Kheng Aik, DR. Pardis MOSLEMZADEH TEHRANI","doi":"10.32890/uumjls2023.14.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The widespread Covid-19 pandemic has significantly impacted business and commerce across the globe, including Malaysia. As aresult, businesses throughout Malaysia may face the inability to perform their contractual obligations and may seek to determine whether they or their counterparty have any legal basis for the non-performance of those contractual obligations. This research used content analysis by categorizing the same theme and discussing the wording adopted in Temporary Measures for Reducing the Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Act 2020, force majeure clause, and the doctrine of frustration in Malaysia. The Temporary Measures for Reducing the Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Act 2020 is one of the defenses available to excuse the non-performance of contractual obligations due to Covid-19. However, the Covid-19 act is relatively new, and no precedent has been established to interpret the vague language adopted in the act. It was found that financial hardship can be a ground for non-performance of contractual obligations. Alternatively, contractual parties may invoke the force majeure clause that is provided in a contract. However, the ability to seek relief for force majeure events depends on the precise wording adopted in the clause. In the absence of a force majeure clause, the contractual parties may consider the doctrine of frustration. However, frustration is not a straightforward doctrine to reckon with. This research will provide insight into contractual parties on their rights, remedies, and repercussions if they choose to terminate the contract due to the widespread Covid-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":37075,"journal":{"name":"UUM Journal of Legal Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS IN MALAYSIA\",\"authors\":\"Tan Kheng Aik, DR. Pardis MOSLEMZADEH TEHRANI\",\"doi\":\"10.32890/uumjls2023.14.2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The widespread Covid-19 pandemic has significantly impacted business and commerce across the globe, including Malaysia. As aresult, businesses throughout Malaysia may face the inability to perform their contractual obligations and may seek to determine whether they or their counterparty have any legal basis for the non-performance of those contractual obligations. This research used content analysis by categorizing the same theme and discussing the wording adopted in Temporary Measures for Reducing the Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Act 2020, force majeure clause, and the doctrine of frustration in Malaysia. The Temporary Measures for Reducing the Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Act 2020 is one of the defenses available to excuse the non-performance of contractual obligations due to Covid-19. However, the Covid-19 act is relatively new, and no precedent has been established to interpret the vague language adopted in the act. It was found that financial hardship can be a ground for non-performance of contractual obligations. Alternatively, contractual parties may invoke the force majeure clause that is provided in a contract. However, the ability to seek relief for force majeure events depends on the precise wording adopted in the clause. In the absence of a force majeure clause, the contractual parties may consider the doctrine of frustration. However, frustration is not a straightforward doctrine to reckon with. This research will provide insight into contractual parties on their rights, remedies, and repercussions if they choose to terminate the contract due to the widespread Covid-19 pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UUM Journal of Legal Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UUM Journal of Legal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2023.14.2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UUM Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2023.14.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

广泛的新冠肺炎疫情对包括马来西亚在内的全球商业和商业产生了重大影响。因此,马来西亚各地的企业可能面临无法履行其合同义务的情况,并可能寻求确定其或其交易对手是否有任何法律依据不履行这些合同义务。这项研究使用了内容分析,对同一主题进行了分类,并讨论了《2020年减少冠状病毒疾病影响的临时措施(新冠肺炎)法案》、不可抗力条款和马来西亚的挫折理论中采用的措辞。《2020年减少2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)影响的临时措施法》是新冠肺炎导致未履行合同义务的辩护理由之一。然而,新冠肺炎法案相对较新,尚未建立先例来解释该法案中采用的模糊语言。据发现,财政困难可能是不履行合同义务的一个理由。或者,合同当事人可以援引合同中规定的不可抗力条款。然而,对不可抗力事件寻求救济的能力取决于条款中采用的确切措辞。在没有不可抗力条款的情况下,合同当事人可以考虑受挫原则。然而,沮丧并不是一个简单的理论。这项研究将深入了解合同当事人在新冠肺炎大流行期间选择终止合同时的权利、补救措施和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS IN MALAYSIA
The widespread Covid-19 pandemic has significantly impacted business and commerce across the globe, including Malaysia. As aresult, businesses throughout Malaysia may face the inability to perform their contractual obligations and may seek to determine whether they or their counterparty have any legal basis for the non-performance of those contractual obligations. This research used content analysis by categorizing the same theme and discussing the wording adopted in Temporary Measures for Reducing the Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Act 2020, force majeure clause, and the doctrine of frustration in Malaysia. The Temporary Measures for Reducing the Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Act 2020 is one of the defenses available to excuse the non-performance of contractual obligations due to Covid-19. However, the Covid-19 act is relatively new, and no precedent has been established to interpret the vague language adopted in the act. It was found that financial hardship can be a ground for non-performance of contractual obligations. Alternatively, contractual parties may invoke the force majeure clause that is provided in a contract. However, the ability to seek relief for force majeure events depends on the precise wording adopted in the clause. In the absence of a force majeure clause, the contractual parties may consider the doctrine of frustration. However, frustration is not a straightforward doctrine to reckon with. This research will provide insight into contractual parties on their rights, remedies, and repercussions if they choose to terminate the contract due to the widespread Covid-19 pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
UUM Journal of Legal Studies
UUM Journal of Legal Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信