{"title":"重新安排历史的家具:作为反殖民实践的非种族主义","authors":"Z. Erasmus","doi":"10.5325/CRITPHILRACE.5.2.0198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a counter-history to liberal conceptions of non-racialism. It outlines historical landmarks in nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century South Africa that shaped anticolonial nonracialism. These reveal the ways colonial authorities used conversion to Christianity, \"tribe,\" and \"race\" to undermine resistance to colonialism, and they show that political approaches to anticolonial resistance were divided about (1) participation in colonial institutions for \"Natives\" and non-collaboration with the colonial state; (2) political mobilization on the basis of race, and nonracialism; and (3) assimilation into the Western, racialized capitalist order as British subjects, and a radical transformation of this order. Contrary to prevailing understandings that anticolonial nonracialism advocated forgetting, transcending and evading race, this article posits that it accounted for racialized difference, contested colonial uses of race, offered a radical critique of the idea of race, and contributes to a new vocabulary for thought about race.","PeriodicalId":43337,"journal":{"name":"Critical Philosophy of Race","volume":"5 1","pages":"198 - 222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rearranging the Furniture of History: Non-Racialism as Anticolonial Praxis\",\"authors\":\"Z. Erasmus\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/CRITPHILRACE.5.2.0198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article provides a counter-history to liberal conceptions of non-racialism. It outlines historical landmarks in nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century South Africa that shaped anticolonial nonracialism. These reveal the ways colonial authorities used conversion to Christianity, \\\"tribe,\\\" and \\\"race\\\" to undermine resistance to colonialism, and they show that political approaches to anticolonial resistance were divided about (1) participation in colonial institutions for \\\"Natives\\\" and non-collaboration with the colonial state; (2) political mobilization on the basis of race, and nonracialism; and (3) assimilation into the Western, racialized capitalist order as British subjects, and a radical transformation of this order. Contrary to prevailing understandings that anticolonial nonracialism advocated forgetting, transcending and evading race, this article posits that it accounted for racialized difference, contested colonial uses of race, offered a radical critique of the idea of race, and contributes to a new vocabulary for thought about race.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Philosophy of Race\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"198 - 222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Philosophy of Race\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/CRITPHILRACE.5.2.0198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Philosophy of Race","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/CRITPHILRACE.5.2.0198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rearranging the Furniture of History: Non-Racialism as Anticolonial Praxis
This article provides a counter-history to liberal conceptions of non-racialism. It outlines historical landmarks in nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century South Africa that shaped anticolonial nonracialism. These reveal the ways colonial authorities used conversion to Christianity, "tribe," and "race" to undermine resistance to colonialism, and they show that political approaches to anticolonial resistance were divided about (1) participation in colonial institutions for "Natives" and non-collaboration with the colonial state; (2) political mobilization on the basis of race, and nonracialism; and (3) assimilation into the Western, racialized capitalist order as British subjects, and a radical transformation of this order. Contrary to prevailing understandings that anticolonial nonracialism advocated forgetting, transcending and evading race, this article posits that it accounted for racialized difference, contested colonial uses of race, offered a radical critique of the idea of race, and contributes to a new vocabulary for thought about race.
期刊介绍:
The critical philosophy of race consists in the philosophical examination of issues raised by the concept of race, the practices and mechanisms of racialization, and the persistence of various forms of racism across the world. Critical philosophy of race is a critical enterprise in three respects: it opposes racism in all its forms; it rejects the pseudosciences of old-fashioned biological racialism; and it denies that anti-racism and anti-racialism summarily eliminate race as a meaningful category of analysis. Critical philosophy of race is a philosophical enterprise because of its engagement with traditional philosophical questions and in its readiness to engage critically some of the traditional answers.