{"title":"关于共和主义的三个错误——对贾法罗夫和胡赛因利的一个答复","authors":"Frank Lovett, Sean Ingham","doi":"10.1080/2158379X.2022.2061126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In their paper, ‘Republican Freedom, Domination, and Ignorability,’ Jafarov and Huseynli argue that our analysis of republican freedom in terms of an ignorability test fails to distinguish republicanism from liberalism. In this reply, we defend our view, showing that their argument rests on three common errors about republicanism: first, that republicanism must distinguish itself from liberalism to succeed; second, that republicans cannot admit probabilistic reasoning; and third, that republican liberty and pure negative liberty generate equivalent judgments about freedom.","PeriodicalId":45560,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Power","volume":"15 1","pages":"235 - 242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three errors about republicanism: a reply to Jafarov and Huseynli\",\"authors\":\"Frank Lovett, Sean Ingham\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2158379X.2022.2061126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In their paper, ‘Republican Freedom, Domination, and Ignorability,’ Jafarov and Huseynli argue that our analysis of republican freedom in terms of an ignorability test fails to distinguish republicanism from liberalism. In this reply, we defend our view, showing that their argument rests on three common errors about republicanism: first, that republicanism must distinguish itself from liberalism to succeed; second, that republicans cannot admit probabilistic reasoning; and third, that republican liberty and pure negative liberty generate equivalent judgments about freedom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Political Power\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"235 - 242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Political Power\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2022.2061126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2022.2061126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Three errors about republicanism: a reply to Jafarov and Huseynli
ABSTRACT In their paper, ‘Republican Freedom, Domination, and Ignorability,’ Jafarov and Huseynli argue that our analysis of republican freedom in terms of an ignorability test fails to distinguish republicanism from liberalism. In this reply, we defend our view, showing that their argument rests on three common errors about republicanism: first, that republicanism must distinguish itself from liberalism to succeed; second, that republicans cannot admit probabilistic reasoning; and third, that republican liberty and pure negative liberty generate equivalent judgments about freedom.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
