荧光流式细胞术联合检测癌症患者血清CEA、CYFRA21-1、CA125和NSE的疗效评价

Xiaoxue Huang, Xiaomeng Zheng, Yiyang Li, L. Duan, Yang Yu
{"title":"荧光流式细胞术联合检测癌症患者血清CEA、CYFRA21-1、CA125和NSE的疗效评价","authors":"Xiaoxue Huang, Xiaomeng Zheng, Yiyang Li, L. Duan, Yang Yu","doi":"10.26689/par.v7i3.4850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the effect of combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in patients with lung cancer by fluorescence flow cytometry. Methods: From August 2019 to July 2022, 200 patients with lung cancer diagnosed by pathology in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. 2 mL venous blood was collected in a fasting state and centrifuged to separate the serum (containing human chorionic gonadotropin antibody [anti-hCG antibody], hepatitis B surface antibody [anti-HBs antibody], and CEA). Results: The sensitivities of CEA and CYFRA21-1 detected via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were 100%, and the detection limits were 0.5 ng/mL and 0.1 ng/mL, respectively; the sensitivities of CA125 and NSE detected via flow cytometry were 100%, and the detection limits were 10 U/mL and 2 ng/mL, respectively. Compared with ELISA, the sensitivities of CA125 and NSE detected via flow cytometry were higher. When the concentration of CEA was 10–40 ng/mL, the sensitivities of the three markers CYFRA21-1, CA125, and NSE showed no significant changes (P > 0.05); when the concentration of CEA was 40–80 ng/mL, the sensitivity of CEA significantly decreased (P < 0.01), but the sensitivities of the three markers CYFRA21-1, CA125, and NSE showed no significant changes (P > 0.05); when the concentration of CEA was 80–200 ng/mL, the sensitivities of all four markers showed no significant changes (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the double-antibody sandwich ELISA, fluorescence flow cytometry has certain advantages, including high sensitivity, good precision, short detection time, low sample usage, and low medical cost; thus, it is worthy of clinical promotion.","PeriodicalId":61025,"journal":{"name":"抗癌研究","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of Combined Detection of Serum CEA, CYFRA21-1, CA125, and NSE in Patients with Lung Cancer by Fluorescence Flow Cytometry\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxue Huang, Xiaomeng Zheng, Yiyang Li, L. Duan, Yang Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.26689/par.v7i3.4850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To investigate the effect of combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in patients with lung cancer by fluorescence flow cytometry. Methods: From August 2019 to July 2022, 200 patients with lung cancer diagnosed by pathology in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. 2 mL venous blood was collected in a fasting state and centrifuged to separate the serum (containing human chorionic gonadotropin antibody [anti-hCG antibody], hepatitis B surface antibody [anti-HBs antibody], and CEA). Results: The sensitivities of CEA and CYFRA21-1 detected via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were 100%, and the detection limits were 0.5 ng/mL and 0.1 ng/mL, respectively; the sensitivities of CA125 and NSE detected via flow cytometry were 100%, and the detection limits were 10 U/mL and 2 ng/mL, respectively. Compared with ELISA, the sensitivities of CA125 and NSE detected via flow cytometry were higher. When the concentration of CEA was 10–40 ng/mL, the sensitivities of the three markers CYFRA21-1, CA125, and NSE showed no significant changes (P > 0.05); when the concentration of CEA was 40–80 ng/mL, the sensitivity of CEA significantly decreased (P < 0.01), but the sensitivities of the three markers CYFRA21-1, CA125, and NSE showed no significant changes (P > 0.05); when the concentration of CEA was 80–200 ng/mL, the sensitivities of all four markers showed no significant changes (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the double-antibody sandwich ELISA, fluorescence flow cytometry has certain advantages, including high sensitivity, good precision, short detection time, low sample usage, and low medical cost; thus, it is worthy of clinical promotion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":61025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"抗癌研究\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"抗癌研究\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26689/par.v7i3.4850\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"抗癌研究","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26689/par.v7i3.4850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨荧光流式细胞术联合检测癌症患者血清癌胚抗原(CEA)、细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)、癌症抗原125(CA125)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)的效果。方法:回顾性分析2019年8月至2022年7月我院经病理诊断的200例癌症患者的临床资料。在禁食状态下收集2mL静脉血并离心以分离血清(含有人绒毛膜促性腺激素抗体[抗hCG抗体]、乙型肝炎表面抗体[抗-HBs抗体]和CEA)。结果:酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测CEA和CYFRA21-1的敏感性为100%,检测限分别为0.5ng/mL和0.1ng/mL;流式细胞仪检测CA125和NSE的敏感性为100%,检测限分别为10U/mL和2ng/mL。流式细胞仪检测CA125和NSE的敏感性高于ELISA。当CEA浓度为10–40 ng/mL时,三种标志物CYFRA21-1、CA125和NSE的敏感性没有显著变化(P>0.05);当CEA浓度为40–80 ng/mL时,CEA的敏感性显著降低(P<0.01),但三种标志物CYFRA21-1、CA125和NSE的敏感性没有显著变化(P>0.05);结论:与双抗体夹心ELISA相比,荧光流式细胞仪具有灵敏度高、精密度好、检测时间短、样品用量少、医疗费用低等优点;值得临床推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Evaluation of Combined Detection of Serum CEA, CYFRA21-1, CA125, and NSE in Patients with Lung Cancer by Fluorescence Flow Cytometry
Objective: To investigate the effect of combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in patients with lung cancer by fluorescence flow cytometry. Methods: From August 2019 to July 2022, 200 patients with lung cancer diagnosed by pathology in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. 2 mL venous blood was collected in a fasting state and centrifuged to separate the serum (containing human chorionic gonadotropin antibody [anti-hCG antibody], hepatitis B surface antibody [anti-HBs antibody], and CEA). Results: The sensitivities of CEA and CYFRA21-1 detected via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were 100%, and the detection limits were 0.5 ng/mL and 0.1 ng/mL, respectively; the sensitivities of CA125 and NSE detected via flow cytometry were 100%, and the detection limits were 10 U/mL and 2 ng/mL, respectively. Compared with ELISA, the sensitivities of CA125 and NSE detected via flow cytometry were higher. When the concentration of CEA was 10–40 ng/mL, the sensitivities of the three markers CYFRA21-1, CA125, and NSE showed no significant changes (P > 0.05); when the concentration of CEA was 40–80 ng/mL, the sensitivity of CEA significantly decreased (P < 0.01), but the sensitivities of the three markers CYFRA21-1, CA125, and NSE showed no significant changes (P > 0.05); when the concentration of CEA was 80–200 ng/mL, the sensitivities of all four markers showed no significant changes (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the double-antibody sandwich ELISA, fluorescence flow cytometry has certain advantages, including high sensitivity, good precision, short detection time, low sample usage, and low medical cost; thus, it is worthy of clinical promotion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信