前言

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Nunno, M. Rauktis, Shalhevet Attar- Schwartz
{"title":"前言","authors":"M. Nunno, M. Rauktis, Shalhevet Attar- Schwartz","doi":"10.1080/0886571X.2020.1723207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This dedicated issue grew out of a symposium entitled Perceptions of safety in child welfare: Contrasting child and adult perspectives at the European Scientific Association on Residential & Family Care for Children and Adolescents (EuSARF) in Porto, Portugal, October-2018. The symposium organizers recognized that a child’s perception of safety and how that perception differs from an adult’s perspective has relevance to professional practice throughout the spectrum of child welfare interventions. Caseworkers assess safety and risk at the time of protective inquiries, removals from parental or foster homes, and placements in residential agencies. Safety assessments persist through a child’s care history to terminations from the child welfare system. Some literature indicates that adults may be guarding against their personal and age-related perceptions of risk and safety, rather than guarding children and youth against the age-appropriate persons, places, and interactions that children perceive (or should perceive) as unsafe. Tim Moore states it is “imperative to understand how children and young people (in care) understand safety, what they believe their safety needs are, and how their understanding influences what they do in situations when they are unsafe” (Moore & McArthur, 2016, p. 1). In some cases, we may be ill-equipping children with little or no teaching and guidance on how to cope with and overcome that fear. The symposium addressed five perspectives from researchers in Australia, Canada, and the United States who have examined children’s perceptions of safety while contrasting their attitudes with those adults who care for them. The implications are critical for children in out-of-home placements but are especially crucial for those children placed in therapeutic residential care since their perception of safety is a requirement for attachment and future developmental relationships. Due to their history of unstable attachment, many youths in out-of-home placements develop maladaptive belief systems for approaching relationships, making them less able to establish and maintain essential bonds with supportive adults. A symposium goal was to build a community of practice from the EUSARF symposium presenters and the audience who have a continued interest in examining children’s safety and its complex perceptual, developmental, situational, ethical, and methodological issues. The co-editors’ wish that this compendium will lead to a community of practice that prompts a vigorous research agenda, as well as practice changes.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0886571X.2020.1723207","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preface\",\"authors\":\"M. Nunno, M. Rauktis, Shalhevet Attar- Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0886571X.2020.1723207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This dedicated issue grew out of a symposium entitled Perceptions of safety in child welfare: Contrasting child and adult perspectives at the European Scientific Association on Residential & Family Care for Children and Adolescents (EuSARF) in Porto, Portugal, October-2018. The symposium organizers recognized that a child’s perception of safety and how that perception differs from an adult’s perspective has relevance to professional practice throughout the spectrum of child welfare interventions. Caseworkers assess safety and risk at the time of protective inquiries, removals from parental or foster homes, and placements in residential agencies. Safety assessments persist through a child’s care history to terminations from the child welfare system. Some literature indicates that adults may be guarding against their personal and age-related perceptions of risk and safety, rather than guarding children and youth against the age-appropriate persons, places, and interactions that children perceive (or should perceive) as unsafe. Tim Moore states it is “imperative to understand how children and young people (in care) understand safety, what they believe their safety needs are, and how their understanding influences what they do in situations when they are unsafe” (Moore & McArthur, 2016, p. 1). In some cases, we may be ill-equipping children with little or no teaching and guidance on how to cope with and overcome that fear. The symposium addressed five perspectives from researchers in Australia, Canada, and the United States who have examined children’s perceptions of safety while contrasting their attitudes with those adults who care for them. The implications are critical for children in out-of-home placements but are especially crucial for those children placed in therapeutic residential care since their perception of safety is a requirement for attachment and future developmental relationships. Due to their history of unstable attachment, many youths in out-of-home placements develop maladaptive belief systems for approaching relationships, making them less able to establish and maintain essential bonds with supportive adults. A symposium goal was to build a community of practice from the EUSARF symposium presenters and the audience who have a continued interest in examining children’s safety and its complex perceptual, developmental, situational, ethical, and methodological issues. The co-editors’ wish that this compendium will lead to a community of practice that prompts a vigorous research agenda, as well as practice changes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0886571X.2020.1723207\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2020.1723207\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2020.1723207","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一专题问题源于2018年10月在葡萄牙波尔图举行的欧洲儿童和青少年住宿和家庭护理科学协会(EuSARF)题为“儿童福利中的安全感:对比儿童和成人的观点”的研讨会。研讨会组织者认识到,儿童对安全的看法以及这种看法与成人的看法有何不同,与整个儿童福利干预范围的专业实践有关。在保护性询问、离开父母或寄养家庭以及安置在寄宿机构时,社会工作者评估安全和风险。安全评估贯穿儿童的照料历史,直至儿童福利系统的终止。一些文献表明,成年人可能会防范他们个人和年龄相关的风险和安全观念,而不是保护儿童和青少年防范儿童认为(或应该认为)不安全的适龄人士、场所和互动。蒂姆·摩尔(Tim Moore)指出,“必须了解儿童和年轻人(被照顾者)如何理解安全,他们认为自己的安全需求是什么,以及他们的理解如何影响他们在不安全的情况下所做的事情”(Moore & McArthur, 2016, p. 1)。在某些情况下,我们可能没有为孩子提供足够的教育和指导,很少或根本没有如何应对和克服这种恐惧。研讨会讨论了澳大利亚、加拿大和美国研究人员的五个观点,他们研究了儿童对安全的看法,并将他们的态度与照顾他们的成年人进行了对比。这对在户外安置的儿童至关重要,但对那些在治疗性住宿护理中的儿童尤为重要,因为他们的安全感是依恋和未来发展关系的必要条件。由于他们的不稳定依恋的历史,许多在家庭外安置的年轻人对接近关系产生了不适应的信念系统,使他们无法与支持他们的成年人建立和维持必要的联系。研讨会的目标是建立一个由EUSARF研讨会主持人和对研究儿童安全及其复杂的感知、发展、情境、伦理和方法问题持续感兴趣的听众组成的实践社区。共同编者的愿望是,这个纲要将导致一个实践社区,促进一个有力的研究议程,以及实践的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preface
This dedicated issue grew out of a symposium entitled Perceptions of safety in child welfare: Contrasting child and adult perspectives at the European Scientific Association on Residential & Family Care for Children and Adolescents (EuSARF) in Porto, Portugal, October-2018. The symposium organizers recognized that a child’s perception of safety and how that perception differs from an adult’s perspective has relevance to professional practice throughout the spectrum of child welfare interventions. Caseworkers assess safety and risk at the time of protective inquiries, removals from parental or foster homes, and placements in residential agencies. Safety assessments persist through a child’s care history to terminations from the child welfare system. Some literature indicates that adults may be guarding against their personal and age-related perceptions of risk and safety, rather than guarding children and youth against the age-appropriate persons, places, and interactions that children perceive (or should perceive) as unsafe. Tim Moore states it is “imperative to understand how children and young people (in care) understand safety, what they believe their safety needs are, and how their understanding influences what they do in situations when they are unsafe” (Moore & McArthur, 2016, p. 1). In some cases, we may be ill-equipping children with little or no teaching and guidance on how to cope with and overcome that fear. The symposium addressed five perspectives from researchers in Australia, Canada, and the United States who have examined children’s perceptions of safety while contrasting their attitudes with those adults who care for them. The implications are critical for children in out-of-home placements but are especially crucial for those children placed in therapeutic residential care since their perception of safety is a requirement for attachment and future developmental relationships. Due to their history of unstable attachment, many youths in out-of-home placements develop maladaptive belief systems for approaching relationships, making them less able to establish and maintain essential bonds with supportive adults. A symposium goal was to build a community of practice from the EUSARF symposium presenters and the audience who have a continued interest in examining children’s safety and its complex perceptual, developmental, situational, ethical, and methodological issues. The co-editors’ wish that this compendium will lead to a community of practice that prompts a vigorous research agenda, as well as practice changes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信