消失的法案:全球社会主义女权主义是跨国女权主义的“失踪的另一半”——对特洛斯塔诺娃、塔帕尔·比约克特和库巴克的回应(2019)

IF 0.9 2区 社会学 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES
C. Bonfiglioli, Kristen R. Ghodsee
{"title":"消失的法案:全球社会主义女权主义是跨国女权主义的“失踪的另一半”——对特洛斯塔诺娃、塔帕尔·比约克特和库巴克的回应(2019)","authors":"C. Bonfiglioli, Kristen R. Ghodsee","doi":"10.1177/0141778920941871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a historian and an ethnographer who have laboured for over a decade to rescue the complex but little-known history of socialist feminist activism in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe, we are delighted to see Madina Tlostanova, Suruchi Thapar-Björkert and Redi Koobak’s contribution on ‘The postsocialist “missing other” of transnational feminism?’ (2019) in the pages of Feminist Review. While we wholeheartedly agree that there is a (post)socialist ‘missing other’ from the intellectual spaces occupied by transnational feminism, we do not believe that this is only due to an epistemic exclusion borne of a ‘strict, Western-centric frame that continues to represent itself as universal and delocalised’ (ibid., p. 82). Rather, it is also the result of the deliberate erasure of the history of an earlier internationalist form of women’s activism that once linked the subaltern subjects of the Global South with their comrades in the former state socialist countries of Eastern Europe. It is our view that the continued equation between Western and socialist colonialities—and the assumption of a long-lasting missed encounter between (post)colonial and (post)socialist subjects—silences the existence of past socialist anti-colonial networks.","PeriodicalId":47487,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Review","volume":"126 1","pages":"168 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0141778920941871","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vanishing Act: Global Socialist Feminism as the ‘Missing Other’ of Transnational Feminism – a Response to Tlostanova, Thapar-Björkert and Koobak (2019)\",\"authors\":\"C. Bonfiglioli, Kristen R. Ghodsee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0141778920941871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a historian and an ethnographer who have laboured for over a decade to rescue the complex but little-known history of socialist feminist activism in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe, we are delighted to see Madina Tlostanova, Suruchi Thapar-Björkert and Redi Koobak’s contribution on ‘The postsocialist “missing other” of transnational feminism?’ (2019) in the pages of Feminist Review. While we wholeheartedly agree that there is a (post)socialist ‘missing other’ from the intellectual spaces occupied by transnational feminism, we do not believe that this is only due to an epistemic exclusion borne of a ‘strict, Western-centric frame that continues to represent itself as universal and delocalised’ (ibid., p. 82). Rather, it is also the result of the deliberate erasure of the history of an earlier internationalist form of women’s activism that once linked the subaltern subjects of the Global South with their comrades in the former state socialist countries of Eastern Europe. It is our view that the continued equation between Western and socialist colonialities—and the assumption of a long-lasting missed encounter between (post)colonial and (post)socialist subjects—silences the existence of past socialist anti-colonial networks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist Review\",\"volume\":\"126 1\",\"pages\":\"168 - 172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0141778920941871\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0141778920941871\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0141778920941871","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

作为一名历史学家和民族志学家,十多年来一直致力于拯救东欧和东南欧复杂但鲜为人知的社会主义女权主义激进主义历史,我们很高兴看到Madina Tlostanova、Suruchi Thapar Björkert和Redi Koobak在“跨国女权主义的后社会主义者“失踪的另一个”?”(2019)发表在《女权主义评论》上。虽然我们完全同意,在跨国女权主义占据的知识空间中,存在一个(后)社会主义者“缺失的另一个”,但我们不认为这只是由于“严格的、以西方为中心的框架所产生的认识排斥,该框架继续将自己表现为普遍的和非殖民化的”(同上,第82页)。相反,这也是故意抹去早期国际主义形式的妇女激进主义历史的结果,这种激进主义曾经将全球南方的下层臣民与他们在东欧前国家社会主义国家的同志联系在一起。我们认为,西方殖民主义和社会主义殖民主义之间的持续等式,以及(后)殖民主义和(后)社会主义主体之间长期错过的相遇的假设,掩盖了过去社会主义反殖民网络的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vanishing Act: Global Socialist Feminism as the ‘Missing Other’ of Transnational Feminism – a Response to Tlostanova, Thapar-Björkert and Koobak (2019)
As a historian and an ethnographer who have laboured for over a decade to rescue the complex but little-known history of socialist feminist activism in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe, we are delighted to see Madina Tlostanova, Suruchi Thapar-Björkert and Redi Koobak’s contribution on ‘The postsocialist “missing other” of transnational feminism?’ (2019) in the pages of Feminist Review. While we wholeheartedly agree that there is a (post)socialist ‘missing other’ from the intellectual spaces occupied by transnational feminism, we do not believe that this is only due to an epistemic exclusion borne of a ‘strict, Western-centric frame that continues to represent itself as universal and delocalised’ (ibid., p. 82). Rather, it is also the result of the deliberate erasure of the history of an earlier internationalist form of women’s activism that once linked the subaltern subjects of the Global South with their comrades in the former state socialist countries of Eastern Europe. It is our view that the continued equation between Western and socialist colonialities—and the assumption of a long-lasting missed encounter between (post)colonial and (post)socialist subjects—silences the existence of past socialist anti-colonial networks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Review
Feminist Review WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Feminist Review is a peer reviewed, interdisciplinary journal setting new agendas for the analysis of the social world. Currently based in London with an international scope, FR invites critical reflection on the relationship between materiality and representation, theory and practice, subjectivity and communities, contemporary and historical formations. The FR Collective is committed to exploring gender in its multiple forms and interrelationships. As well as academic articles we publish experimental pieces, visual and textual media and political interventions, including, for example, interviews, short stories, poems and photographic essays.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信