标记的独特功能:意义的延伸还是缩小?

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Salomão António Muressama Viagem
{"title":"标记的独特功能:意义的延伸还是缩小?","authors":"Salomão António Muressama Viagem","doi":"10.24840/2182-9845_2018-0003_0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EnglishOne of the unquestionable issues of trademark law is that relating to \"trademark functions\", which is studied both from a socio-economic perspective and from a legal point of view. Although the theme is not current, for Mozambique, an emerging country in the field of Industrial Property and of course in Trademark Law, its study is still necessary. Here, only the legal functions of trademarks, which have long been discussed, will be examined; three main functions have hitherto been identified, namely: distinctive function, guarantee function or quality, and attractive or advertising function. Among these functions, which has gathered consensus among the writers of matter, is the distinctive function. However, even in relation to this \"distinctive\" function, the authors differ in their understanding of their meaning. Some are of the reductive idea of the meaning of the distinctive function, others suggest a broad or at least dualistic meaning. In view of the European trademark doctrine and law and specific rules of the Industrial Property Code of Mozambique (once the Mozambican trademark doctrine is scarce), we will be careful to examine the two guidelines in order to ascertain what is closest to the current reality of brands. portuguesUma das incontornaveis materias do Direito de Marcas e a relativa as “funcoes das marcas”, estudadas quer na perspetiva socioeconomica quer na perspetiva juridica. Embora o tema nao seja atual, para Mocambique, pais emergente no dominio da Propriedade Industrial e naturalmente no Direito de Marcas, ainda se afigura necessario o seu estudo. Aqui, serao objecto de analise, apenas, as funcoes juridicas, sobre as quais ha muito que se tem discutido; tendo ate aqui sido identificadas tres principais funcoes, a saber: funcao distintiva, funcao de garantia ou de qualidade e funcao atrativa ou de publicidade. De entre estas funcoes a que tem reunido consensos entre os tratadistas da materia, e a funcao distintiva. Todavia, mesmo em relacao a esta funcao “distintiva”, os autores divergem no entendimento sobre o seu significado, facto que origina duas orientacoes doutrinarias e legais a saber: a redutora do significado da funcao distintiva e a alargadora ou dualista. Tendo em conta a doutrina e a lei europeia em materia de marcas e pontuais normas do Codigo da Propriedade Industrial de Mocambique (uma vez escassa a doutrina mocambicana sobre marcas) curaremos de examinar as duas orientacoes para aferir qual se mostra mais proxima da atual realidade das marcas.","PeriodicalId":40129,"journal":{"name":"RED-Revista Electronica de Direito","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Função distintiva da marca: alargamento ou redução do seu significado?\",\"authors\":\"Salomão António Muressama Viagem\",\"doi\":\"10.24840/2182-9845_2018-0003_0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"EnglishOne of the unquestionable issues of trademark law is that relating to \\\"trademark functions\\\", which is studied both from a socio-economic perspective and from a legal point of view. Although the theme is not current, for Mozambique, an emerging country in the field of Industrial Property and of course in Trademark Law, its study is still necessary. Here, only the legal functions of trademarks, which have long been discussed, will be examined; three main functions have hitherto been identified, namely: distinctive function, guarantee function or quality, and attractive or advertising function. Among these functions, which has gathered consensus among the writers of matter, is the distinctive function. However, even in relation to this \\\"distinctive\\\" function, the authors differ in their understanding of their meaning. Some are of the reductive idea of the meaning of the distinctive function, others suggest a broad or at least dualistic meaning. In view of the European trademark doctrine and law and specific rules of the Industrial Property Code of Mozambique (once the Mozambican trademark doctrine is scarce), we will be careful to examine the two guidelines in order to ascertain what is closest to the current reality of brands. portuguesUma das incontornaveis materias do Direito de Marcas e a relativa as “funcoes das marcas”, estudadas quer na perspetiva socioeconomica quer na perspetiva juridica. Embora o tema nao seja atual, para Mocambique, pais emergente no dominio da Propriedade Industrial e naturalmente no Direito de Marcas, ainda se afigura necessario o seu estudo. Aqui, serao objecto de analise, apenas, as funcoes juridicas, sobre as quais ha muito que se tem discutido; tendo ate aqui sido identificadas tres principais funcoes, a saber: funcao distintiva, funcao de garantia ou de qualidade e funcao atrativa ou de publicidade. De entre estas funcoes a que tem reunido consensos entre os tratadistas da materia, e a funcao distintiva. Todavia, mesmo em relacao a esta funcao “distintiva”, os autores divergem no entendimento sobre o seu significado, facto que origina duas orientacoes doutrinarias e legais a saber: a redutora do significado da funcao distintiva e a alargadora ou dualista. Tendo em conta a doutrina e a lei europeia em materia de marcas e pontuais normas do Codigo da Propriedade Industrial de Mocambique (uma vez escassa a doutrina mocambicana sobre marcas) curaremos de examinar as duas orientacoes para aferir qual se mostra mais proxima da atual realidade das marcas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RED-Revista Electronica de Direito\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RED-Revista Electronica de Direito\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24840/2182-9845_2018-0003_0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RED-Revista Electronica de Direito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24840/2182-9845_2018-0003_0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英语商标法中一个不容置疑的问题是与“商标功能”有关的问题,这一问题从社会经济和法律的角度进行了研究。虽然这一主题不是当前的主题,但对于莫桑比克这个在工业产权领域,当然也在商标法领域的新兴国家来说,其研究仍然是必要的。在这里,我们只讨论商标的法律功能,这是长期以来讨论的;迄今为止已确定了三种主要功能,即:特色功能,保证功能或质量,吸引功能或广告功能。在这些功能中,有一种独特的功能,已经在物质的作者中得到了共识。然而,即使在这种“独特”的功能方面,作者对其含义的理解也存在差异。有些是对独特功能的意义的还原观念,另一些则提出了一个广泛的或至少是二元的意义。鉴于欧洲商标理论和法律以及莫桑比克工业产权法典的具体规则(一旦莫桑比克商标理论稀缺),我们将仔细研究这两个指导方针,以确定最接近当前品牌现实的是什么。葡萄牙的“当代材料”与“市场功能”是相对的,“社会经济视角”与“司法视角”是相对的。从莫桑比克的角度来看,这是一项新的经济发展计划,是一项新的工业发展计划,是一项新的工业发展计划,也是一项新的经济发展计划。因此,分析的目的是明确的,就像司法功能一样,严肃的,就像在讨论的过程中一样;三种主要功能,一种是功能特色,一种是功能保证,一种是功能质量,一种是功能吸引,一种是功能宣传。从功能的角度来看,这是一个独特的项目,从共识的角度来看,这是一个独特的功能。今天,mesmo似乎是相对于一种“独特”的功能而言的,它是一种“自我分化”,一种“自我分化”,一种“自我分化”,一种“自我分化”,一种“自我分化”,一种“自我分化”,一种“自我分化”,一种“自我分化”,一种“自我分化”,一种“自我分化”。一般情况下,市场材料和莫桑比克工业专有技术的标准(例如,莫桑比克工业专有技术的标准)是一项具有审查性质的标准,因为它们是一项具有审查性质的标准,而不是一项具有审查性质的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Função distintiva da marca: alargamento ou redução do seu significado?
EnglishOne of the unquestionable issues of trademark law is that relating to "trademark functions", which is studied both from a socio-economic perspective and from a legal point of view. Although the theme is not current, for Mozambique, an emerging country in the field of Industrial Property and of course in Trademark Law, its study is still necessary. Here, only the legal functions of trademarks, which have long been discussed, will be examined; three main functions have hitherto been identified, namely: distinctive function, guarantee function or quality, and attractive or advertising function. Among these functions, which has gathered consensus among the writers of matter, is the distinctive function. However, even in relation to this "distinctive" function, the authors differ in their understanding of their meaning. Some are of the reductive idea of the meaning of the distinctive function, others suggest a broad or at least dualistic meaning. In view of the European trademark doctrine and law and specific rules of the Industrial Property Code of Mozambique (once the Mozambican trademark doctrine is scarce), we will be careful to examine the two guidelines in order to ascertain what is closest to the current reality of brands. portuguesUma das incontornaveis materias do Direito de Marcas e a relativa as “funcoes das marcas”, estudadas quer na perspetiva socioeconomica quer na perspetiva juridica. Embora o tema nao seja atual, para Mocambique, pais emergente no dominio da Propriedade Industrial e naturalmente no Direito de Marcas, ainda se afigura necessario o seu estudo. Aqui, serao objecto de analise, apenas, as funcoes juridicas, sobre as quais ha muito que se tem discutido; tendo ate aqui sido identificadas tres principais funcoes, a saber: funcao distintiva, funcao de garantia ou de qualidade e funcao atrativa ou de publicidade. De entre estas funcoes a que tem reunido consensos entre os tratadistas da materia, e a funcao distintiva. Todavia, mesmo em relacao a esta funcao “distintiva”, os autores divergem no entendimento sobre o seu significado, facto que origina duas orientacoes doutrinarias e legais a saber: a redutora do significado da funcao distintiva e a alargadora ou dualista. Tendo em conta a doutrina e a lei europeia em materia de marcas e pontuais normas do Codigo da Propriedade Industrial de Mocambique (uma vez escassa a doutrina mocambicana sobre marcas) curaremos de examinar as duas orientacoes para aferir qual se mostra mais proxima da atual realidade das marcas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信