Key风险指标重新加载

MAB Pub Date : 2022-07-28 DOI:10.5117/mab.96.80730
Gerrit Jan van den Brink, M. Leipoldt
{"title":"Key风险指标重新加载","authors":"Gerrit Jan van den Brink, M. Leipoldt","doi":"10.5117/mab.96.80730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although Key Risk Indicators have been a staple for Operational Risk Management reports in financial institutions for years now, they are rarely drivers for action and their relevance is waning. The authors argue that, for Key Risk Indicators to become more relevant, they should be recast as predominantly business (first line of defence) driven and made practical rather than theoretical. After describing the current state of Key Risk Indicators and the future for such indicators in case no action is taken, an ideal situation is outlined and five recommendations are presented that serve as practical steps towards that ideal state.","PeriodicalId":33800,"journal":{"name":"MAB","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key Risk Indicators reloaded\",\"authors\":\"Gerrit Jan van den Brink, M. Leipoldt\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/mab.96.80730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although Key Risk Indicators have been a staple for Operational Risk Management reports in financial institutions for years now, they are rarely drivers for action and their relevance is waning. The authors argue that, for Key Risk Indicators to become more relevant, they should be recast as predominantly business (first line of defence) driven and made practical rather than theoretical. After describing the current state of Key Risk Indicators and the future for such indicators in case no action is taken, an ideal situation is outlined and five recommendations are presented that serve as practical steps towards that ideal state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MAB\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MAB\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/mab.96.80730\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MAB","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/mab.96.80730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管关键风险指标多年来一直是金融机构操作风险管理报告的主要内容,但它们很少成为行动的驱动因素,而且它们的相关性正在减弱。作者认为,为了使关键风险指标变得更加相关,它们应该被重新定义为主要由业务(第一道防线)驱动,并使其具有实用性而不是理论性。在描述了关键风险指标的现状和在不采取行动的情况下这些指标的未来之后,概述了理想的情况,并提出了五项建议,作为实现理想状态的实际步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Key Risk Indicators reloaded
Although Key Risk Indicators have been a staple for Operational Risk Management reports in financial institutions for years now, they are rarely drivers for action and their relevance is waning. The authors argue that, for Key Risk Indicators to become more relevant, they should be recast as predominantly business (first line of defence) driven and made practical rather than theoretical. After describing the current state of Key Risk Indicators and the future for such indicators in case no action is taken, an ideal situation is outlined and five recommendations are presented that serve as practical steps towards that ideal state.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MAB
MAB
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信