{"title":"2019年流动古物计划报告","authors":"Laura Burnett, R. Webley","doi":"10.1080/00794236.2021.1972589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work of the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS) has been highlighted in this journal since 2005 and an introduction to the organisation can be found in previous reports. In 2019, 16,319 objects dating to the post-medieval and modern periods were recorded by the PAS in 13,454 records. This represented 20% of all objects recorded; a 9% increase in objects but a slight decrease in proportion from 2018, reflecting more recording in general. The major functional categories (calculated by object) were currency (coins and tokens) (42%), dress accessories (21%), arms and armour (6%), trade equipment (including jettons) (9%), vessels (4%), animal (including equestrian) equipment (3%), household fittings (4%), tools and utensils (2%), and entertainment and leisure (2%). In the report for 2015 we noted a change in guidance whereby the PAS was being more selective in recording material dateable after 1540, and the reasons for it. Of course, more recent artefacts of local importance continue to be recorded by the Finds Liaison Officers (FLOs), as do items of Treasure. From the above statistics it appears this change in guidance is not having a major impact on the quantities of post-medieval finds recorded, suggesting it just codified existing practice. As ever, many finds recorded in 2019 are both noteworthy and provide potential for further research, both into the objects and their context, and a few are highlighted and discussed here.","PeriodicalId":43560,"journal":{"name":"Post-Medieval Archaeology","volume":"55 1","pages":"293 - 304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Report of the Portable Antiquities Scheme 2019\",\"authors\":\"Laura Burnett, R. Webley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00794236.2021.1972589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The work of the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS) has been highlighted in this journal since 2005 and an introduction to the organisation can be found in previous reports. In 2019, 16,319 objects dating to the post-medieval and modern periods were recorded by the PAS in 13,454 records. This represented 20% of all objects recorded; a 9% increase in objects but a slight decrease in proportion from 2018, reflecting more recording in general. The major functional categories (calculated by object) were currency (coins and tokens) (42%), dress accessories (21%), arms and armour (6%), trade equipment (including jettons) (9%), vessels (4%), animal (including equestrian) equipment (3%), household fittings (4%), tools and utensils (2%), and entertainment and leisure (2%). In the report for 2015 we noted a change in guidance whereby the PAS was being more selective in recording material dateable after 1540, and the reasons for it. Of course, more recent artefacts of local importance continue to be recorded by the Finds Liaison Officers (FLOs), as do items of Treasure. From the above statistics it appears this change in guidance is not having a major impact on the quantities of post-medieval finds recorded, suggesting it just codified existing practice. As ever, many finds recorded in 2019 are both noteworthy and provide potential for further research, both into the objects and their context, and a few are highlighted and discussed here.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Post-Medieval Archaeology\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"293 - 304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Post-Medieval Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00794236.2021.1972589\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Post-Medieval Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00794236.2021.1972589","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The work of the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS) has been highlighted in this journal since 2005 and an introduction to the organisation can be found in previous reports. In 2019, 16,319 objects dating to the post-medieval and modern periods were recorded by the PAS in 13,454 records. This represented 20% of all objects recorded; a 9% increase in objects but a slight decrease in proportion from 2018, reflecting more recording in general. The major functional categories (calculated by object) were currency (coins and tokens) (42%), dress accessories (21%), arms and armour (6%), trade equipment (including jettons) (9%), vessels (4%), animal (including equestrian) equipment (3%), household fittings (4%), tools and utensils (2%), and entertainment and leisure (2%). In the report for 2015 we noted a change in guidance whereby the PAS was being more selective in recording material dateable after 1540, and the reasons for it. Of course, more recent artefacts of local importance continue to be recorded by the Finds Liaison Officers (FLOs), as do items of Treasure. From the above statistics it appears this change in guidance is not having a major impact on the quantities of post-medieval finds recorded, suggesting it just codified existing practice. As ever, many finds recorded in 2019 are both noteworthy and provide potential for further research, both into the objects and their context, and a few are highlighted and discussed here.