青少年谎言可接受性个体差异的预测因素:探讨社会可取性、冷酷无情特质和躯体化的影响

IF 0.8 4区心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.24193/jebp.2020.2.11

Iulia Butean, Ionuț Mone, Laura Visu-Petra, A. Opre

{"title":"青少年谎言可接受性个体差异的预测因素:探讨社会可取性、冷酷无情特质和躯体化的影响","authors":"Iulia Butean, Ionuț Mone, Laura Visu-Petra, A. Opre","doi":"10.24193/jebp.2020.2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Lie acceptability is defined as an attitude toward lying that can vary along a continuum, from considering that lying is completely unacceptable, to a most lenient view upon deception. The present research focused on identifying factors associated with individual differences in lie acceptability in a sample of Romanian adolescents (N =167, 14-19 years). We investigated associations between variables with a preliminary documented theoretical and/or empirical association with lie acceptability (callous-unemotional traits or social desirability), along with exploratory age-specific measures of somatization. Our results revealed that male adolescents who displayed high callousness, uncaring, or somatization tended to view lying as more acceptable. Social desirability did not predict lie acceptability above and beyond these individual predictors. The implications of these findings for attempts to reduce problematic deceptive behavior in adolescence are discussed.\"","PeriodicalId":43042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies","volume":"20 1","pages":"51-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of Individual Differences in Lie Acceptability in Adolescence: Exploring the Influence of Social Desirability, Callous Unemotional Traits and Somatization\",\"authors\":\"Iulia Butean, Ionuț Mone, Laura Visu-Petra, A. Opre\",\"doi\":\"10.24193/jebp.2020.2.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"Lie acceptability is defined as an attitude toward lying that can vary along a continuum, from considering that lying is completely unacceptable, to a most lenient view upon deception. The present research focused on identifying factors associated with individual differences in lie acceptability in a sample of Romanian adolescents (N =167, 14-19 years). We investigated associations between variables with a preliminary documented theoretical and/or empirical association with lie acceptability (callous-unemotional traits or social desirability), along with exploratory age-specific measures of somatization. Our results revealed that male adolescents who displayed high callousness, uncaring, or somatization tended to view lying as more acceptable. Social desirability did not predict lie acceptability above and beyond these individual predictors. The implications of these findings for attempts to reduce problematic deceptive behavior in adolescence are discussed.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":43042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"51-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24193/jebp.2020.2.11\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/jebp.2020.2.11","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

摘要

“谎言的可接受性被定义为对谎言的态度，这种态度可以沿着一个连续体变化，从认为谎言是完全不可接受的，到对欺骗的最宽容的看法。”目前的研究重点是确定罗马尼亚青少年样本中与谎言可接受性个体差异相关的因素(N =167, 14-19岁)。我们调查了与谎言可接受性(冷酷无情的特征或社会可取性)的初步理论和/或经验相关的变量之间的关联，以及探索性的年龄特异性躯体化测量。我们的研究结果显示，表现出高度麻木、冷漠或躯体化的男性青少年更容易接受说谎。社会期望并不能预测谎言的可接受性。我们还讨论了这些发现对减少青少年有问题的欺骗行为的影响。”

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Predictors of Individual Differences in Lie Acceptability in Adolescence: Exploring the Influence of Social Desirability, Callous Unemotional Traits and Somatization

"Lie acceptability is defined as an attitude toward lying that can vary along a continuum, from considering that lying is completely unacceptable, to a most lenient view upon deception. The present research focused on identifying factors associated with individual differences in lie acceptability in a sample of Romanian adolescents (N =167, 14-19 years). We investigated associations between variables with a preliminary documented theoretical and/or empirical association with lie acceptability (callous-unemotional traits or social desirability), along with exploratory age-specific measures of somatization. Our results revealed that male adolescents who displayed high callousness, uncaring, or somatization tended to view lying as more acceptable. Social desirability did not predict lie acceptability above and beyond these individual predictors. The implications of these findings for attempts to reduce problematic deceptive behavior in adolescence are discussed."

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The journal is devoted to the advancement of the clinical theory and practice of evidence-based psychotherapies (EBP) (e.g., evidence-based psychological assessments, evidence-based psychological treatments). The journal publishes original papers dealing with EBP and psychology, psychiatry, the medical and mental specialties, and allied areas of science.