{"title":"ABO相容性对单倍体造血干细胞移植的影响","authors":"R. Sawant, S. Sen, Deepali Naker","doi":"10.4103/ijot.ijot_134_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for hematologic malignancies. Nowadays, usually, haploidentical stem cell transplant is performed across the ABO blood group barrier; however, the effect of ABO incompatibility on haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is still uncertain. Methodology: Retrospective analysis of data of patients who underwent haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation at our hospital was performed. The patient cohort was classified in to two arms: ABO compatible and ABO-incompatible haploidentical stem cell transplantation. ABO-incompatible was further categorized as major mismatch, minor mismatch and bidirectional mismatch. The average follow-up period was 6 months posttransplant for which the following parameters were studied: (a) engraftment kinetics for white blood cell (WBC) and platelets, (b) graft rejection, (c) overall graft survival, (d) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and (e) clinical variation in outcome for patients receiving peripheral blood stem cell/bone marrow harvest (BMH) as the source of stem cells. Results: The median age of recipients for both ABO compatible and ABO incompatible was 24 years and most of them were parent-offspring transplants. A total of 39 patients underwent haploidentical stem cell transplantation during the study period. Our cohort consisted of 23 ABO-compatible patients and 17 ABO incompatible patients. Out of these 17, 6 were major mismatch, 11 were minor mismatch and none were bidirectional mismatch. Of these 39 patients, 82% (32/39) engrafted within the normal expected time frame. The average days to WBC and platelet engraftment in these subgroups were noted to be as follows: Major – 12 and 18 days, compatible – 9 and 17 days, and minor – 10 and 17 days, respectively. Graft failure was observed in 20% (8/39) of patients, of which 4 patients had undergone ABO-compatible transplants while 4 patients had undergone minor ABO incompatible transplants. In this study, we observed that major ABO incompatibility had severe risk of GVHD (17%) compared to compatible (39%) and minor (27%) blood group mismatch. The overall survival rate in 6 months was equal (70%) in both arms. 5/39 patients, i.e., 12% received BMH as the source of stem cells, of these 80% are alive. Conclusion: Haploidentical transplants done in patients with ABO-incompatible donors had outcomes comparable to the ABO-compatible group. The risk of severe GVHD did not increased in the ABO mismatch group. Recipient of BMH had a marginally better graft survival.","PeriodicalId":37455,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Transplantation","volume":"17 1","pages":"181 - 184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of ABO compatibility on haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplant\",\"authors\":\"R. Sawant, S. Sen, Deepali Naker\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijot.ijot_134_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for hematologic malignancies. Nowadays, usually, haploidentical stem cell transplant is performed across the ABO blood group barrier; however, the effect of ABO incompatibility on haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is still uncertain. Methodology: Retrospective analysis of data of patients who underwent haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation at our hospital was performed. The patient cohort was classified in to two arms: ABO compatible and ABO-incompatible haploidentical stem cell transplantation. ABO-incompatible was further categorized as major mismatch, minor mismatch and bidirectional mismatch. The average follow-up period was 6 months posttransplant for which the following parameters were studied: (a) engraftment kinetics for white blood cell (WBC) and platelets, (b) graft rejection, (c) overall graft survival, (d) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and (e) clinical variation in outcome for patients receiving peripheral blood stem cell/bone marrow harvest (BMH) as the source of stem cells. Results: The median age of recipients for both ABO compatible and ABO incompatible was 24 years and most of them were parent-offspring transplants. A total of 39 patients underwent haploidentical stem cell transplantation during the study period. Our cohort consisted of 23 ABO-compatible patients and 17 ABO incompatible patients. Out of these 17, 6 were major mismatch, 11 were minor mismatch and none were bidirectional mismatch. Of these 39 patients, 82% (32/39) engrafted within the normal expected time frame. The average days to WBC and platelet engraftment in these subgroups were noted to be as follows: Major – 12 and 18 days, compatible – 9 and 17 days, and minor – 10 and 17 days, respectively. Graft failure was observed in 20% (8/39) of patients, of which 4 patients had undergone ABO-compatible transplants while 4 patients had undergone minor ABO incompatible transplants. In this study, we observed that major ABO incompatibility had severe risk of GVHD (17%) compared to compatible (39%) and minor (27%) blood group mismatch. The overall survival rate in 6 months was equal (70%) in both arms. 5/39 patients, i.e., 12% received BMH as the source of stem cells, of these 80% are alive. Conclusion: Haploidentical transplants done in patients with ABO-incompatible donors had outcomes comparable to the ABO-compatible group. The risk of severe GVHD did not increased in the ABO mismatch group. Recipient of BMH had a marginally better graft survival.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"181 - 184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijot.ijot_134_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijot.ijot_134_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of ABO compatibility on haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplant
Introduction: Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for hematologic malignancies. Nowadays, usually, haploidentical stem cell transplant is performed across the ABO blood group barrier; however, the effect of ABO incompatibility on haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is still uncertain. Methodology: Retrospective analysis of data of patients who underwent haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation at our hospital was performed. The patient cohort was classified in to two arms: ABO compatible and ABO-incompatible haploidentical stem cell transplantation. ABO-incompatible was further categorized as major mismatch, minor mismatch and bidirectional mismatch. The average follow-up period was 6 months posttransplant for which the following parameters were studied: (a) engraftment kinetics for white blood cell (WBC) and platelets, (b) graft rejection, (c) overall graft survival, (d) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and (e) clinical variation in outcome for patients receiving peripheral blood stem cell/bone marrow harvest (BMH) as the source of stem cells. Results: The median age of recipients for both ABO compatible and ABO incompatible was 24 years and most of them were parent-offspring transplants. A total of 39 patients underwent haploidentical stem cell transplantation during the study period. Our cohort consisted of 23 ABO-compatible patients and 17 ABO incompatible patients. Out of these 17, 6 were major mismatch, 11 were minor mismatch and none were bidirectional mismatch. Of these 39 patients, 82% (32/39) engrafted within the normal expected time frame. The average days to WBC and platelet engraftment in these subgroups were noted to be as follows: Major – 12 and 18 days, compatible – 9 and 17 days, and minor – 10 and 17 days, respectively. Graft failure was observed in 20% (8/39) of patients, of which 4 patients had undergone ABO-compatible transplants while 4 patients had undergone minor ABO incompatible transplants. In this study, we observed that major ABO incompatibility had severe risk of GVHD (17%) compared to compatible (39%) and minor (27%) blood group mismatch. The overall survival rate in 6 months was equal (70%) in both arms. 5/39 patients, i.e., 12% received BMH as the source of stem cells, of these 80% are alive. Conclusion: Haploidentical transplants done in patients with ABO-incompatible donors had outcomes comparable to the ABO-compatible group. The risk of severe GVHD did not increased in the ABO mismatch group. Recipient of BMH had a marginally better graft survival.
期刊介绍:
Indian Journal of Transplantation, an official publication of Indian Society of Organ Transplantation (ISOT), is a peer-reviewed print + online quarterly national journal. The journal''s full text is available online at http://www.ijtonline.in. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. It has many articles which include original articIes, review articles, case reports etc and is very popular among the nephrologists, urologists and transplant surgeons alike. It has a very wide circulation among all the nephrologists, urologists, transplant surgeons and physicians iinvolved in kidney, heart, liver, lungs and pancreas transplantation.