关系精神分析核心能力综述:实践学习与研究指南

IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
John V. O’leary
{"title":"关系精神分析核心能力综述:实践学习与研究指南","authors":"John V. O’leary","doi":"10.1080/00107530.2022.2158660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Here we have a book that strives and mostly succeeds, to capture the scope and the marrow of Relational Psychoanalysis in all of its media: practice, theory and research. A book with the title Core Competencies of Relational Psychoanalysis; A Guide to Practice, Study, and Research can seem both awe inspiring and confusing at the same time. To develop a broad and deep, comprehensive evaluation of any theory or mode of thought and praxis and to then further break that theory down into essential components, would be an overwhelming task. This undertaking for Relational Psychoanalysis presents special challenges, indeed. Relational thought was born in reaction to the perceived authoritarianism of other models of psychological and analytic thought. One must avoid reducing the definitions of postmodernism to a critique of metanarratives since then it will be almost impossible to compare the truthfulness of one story-line or theory with another. The least that a psychoanalyst might expect from a text-like work is an adherence to objectivity and a desire for all the so-called “facts” in a vivid and hierarchical manner. The pervasive multiplicity of Relational Theory seems a further obstacle to classification. Multiplicity pervades the relational world. It is found in multiple theories of motivation; the notion of multiple selves; multiple perspectives; the critique on binary thinking especially","PeriodicalId":46058,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Psychoanalysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of Core Competencies of Relational Psychoanalysis: A Guide to Practice Study and Research\",\"authors\":\"John V. O’leary\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00107530.2022.2158660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Here we have a book that strives and mostly succeeds, to capture the scope and the marrow of Relational Psychoanalysis in all of its media: practice, theory and research. A book with the title Core Competencies of Relational Psychoanalysis; A Guide to Practice, Study, and Research can seem both awe inspiring and confusing at the same time. To develop a broad and deep, comprehensive evaluation of any theory or mode of thought and praxis and to then further break that theory down into essential components, would be an overwhelming task. This undertaking for Relational Psychoanalysis presents special challenges, indeed. Relational thought was born in reaction to the perceived authoritarianism of other models of psychological and analytic thought. One must avoid reducing the definitions of postmodernism to a critique of metanarratives since then it will be almost impossible to compare the truthfulness of one story-line or theory with another. The least that a psychoanalyst might expect from a text-like work is an adherence to objectivity and a desire for all the so-called “facts” in a vivid and hierarchical manner. The pervasive multiplicity of Relational Theory seems a further obstacle to classification. Multiplicity pervades the relational world. It is found in multiple theories of motivation; the notion of multiple selves; multiple perspectives; the critique on binary thinking especially\",\"PeriodicalId\":46058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Psychoanalysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Psychoanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2022.2158660\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2022.2158660","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这里,我们有一本书,它努力并取得了很大的成功,以捕捉关系心理分析在所有媒体中的范围和精髓:实践、理论和研究。一本名为《关系心理分析的核心能力》的书;《实践、学习和研究指南》既令人敬畏,又令人困惑。对任何理论、思维模式和实践进行广泛而深入的全面评估,然后将该理论进一步分解为基本组成部分,将是一项艰巨的任务。关系心理分析的这项工作确实带来了特殊的挑战。关系思维是对其他心理学和分析思维模式的威权主义的反应而产生的。人们必须避免将后现代主义的定义简化为对元叙事的批判,因为从那时起,几乎不可能将一个故事线或理论的真实性与另一个进行比较。精神分析学家对类似文本的作品最起码的期望是坚持客观性,并以生动和分级的方式渴望所有所谓的“事实”。关系理论的普遍多样性似乎是分类的进一步障碍。多元性充斥着关系世界。它存在于多种动机理论中;多重自我的概念;多元视角;尤其是对二元思维的批判
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A review of Core Competencies of Relational Psychoanalysis: A Guide to Practice Study and Research
Here we have a book that strives and mostly succeeds, to capture the scope and the marrow of Relational Psychoanalysis in all of its media: practice, theory and research. A book with the title Core Competencies of Relational Psychoanalysis; A Guide to Practice, Study, and Research can seem both awe inspiring and confusing at the same time. To develop a broad and deep, comprehensive evaluation of any theory or mode of thought and praxis and to then further break that theory down into essential components, would be an overwhelming task. This undertaking for Relational Psychoanalysis presents special challenges, indeed. Relational thought was born in reaction to the perceived authoritarianism of other models of psychological and analytic thought. One must avoid reducing the definitions of postmodernism to a critique of metanarratives since then it will be almost impossible to compare the truthfulness of one story-line or theory with another. The least that a psychoanalyst might expect from a text-like work is an adherence to objectivity and a desire for all the so-called “facts” in a vivid and hierarchical manner. The pervasive multiplicity of Relational Theory seems a further obstacle to classification. Multiplicity pervades the relational world. It is found in multiple theories of motivation; the notion of multiple selves; multiple perspectives; the critique on binary thinking especially
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信