上腰椎间盘突出症的手术技术与临床疗效

A. F. Toubar, M. E. Sawy
{"title":"上腰椎间盘突出症的手术技术与临床疗效","authors":"A. F. Toubar, M. E. Sawy","doi":"10.21608/ESJ.2019.7149.1086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Data: Upper lumbar disc herniation involving D12/L1, L1/L2, and L2/L3 levels is less prevalent than lower lumbar discs. In terms of clinical characteristics and surgical managements, they are different from those at the lower levels of the lumbar spine. Spinal canals are narrower than those of the lower levels, which may compromise multiple spinal nerve roots or conus medullaris with higher complication rate with surgical intervention. Purpose: To investigate the clinical features and surgical outcomes of patients operated on for upper lumbar disc herniations. Study Design: Retrospective clinical cohort study. Patients and Methods: This study included 20 patients diagnosed with herniated disc at upper levels (T12-L1, L1-L2, and L2-L3). Patients were operated on during the period between June 2015 to March 2017. All patients were operated on via transfacet approach with pedicle screw fixation. Postoperative data including clinical and neurological outcomes and radiographic imaging have been collected. Postoperative follow-up evaluation included immediate postoperative medical records and a postoperative visit to the outpatient clinic until 18 months postoperatively. Patients’ outcomes were assessed using Visual Analogue Scale of radicular and back pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) as functional score. Results: Over a mean follow-up period of 13±2.5 months, there was significant improvement in radicular pain (P = 0.0026) and back pain (P = 0.049) and myelopathy and statistically significant improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (P = 0.0032) compared to the preoperative value. No postoperative complications were detected in this series. Conclusion: This approach offers a safe technique for decompression and stabilization at lower thoracic and upper lumbar region. (2019ESJ178)","PeriodicalId":11610,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Herniated Disc at the Upper Lumbar Region: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"A. F. Toubar, M. E. Sawy\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ESJ.2019.7149.1086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Data: Upper lumbar disc herniation involving D12/L1, L1/L2, and L2/L3 levels is less prevalent than lower lumbar discs. In terms of clinical characteristics and surgical managements, they are different from those at the lower levels of the lumbar spine. Spinal canals are narrower than those of the lower levels, which may compromise multiple spinal nerve roots or conus medullaris with higher complication rate with surgical intervention. Purpose: To investigate the clinical features and surgical outcomes of patients operated on for upper lumbar disc herniations. Study Design: Retrospective clinical cohort study. Patients and Methods: This study included 20 patients diagnosed with herniated disc at upper levels (T12-L1, L1-L2, and L2-L3). Patients were operated on during the period between June 2015 to March 2017. All patients were operated on via transfacet approach with pedicle screw fixation. Postoperative data including clinical and neurological outcomes and radiographic imaging have been collected. Postoperative follow-up evaluation included immediate postoperative medical records and a postoperative visit to the outpatient clinic until 18 months postoperatively. Patients’ outcomes were assessed using Visual Analogue Scale of radicular and back pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) as functional score. Results: Over a mean follow-up period of 13±2.5 months, there was significant improvement in radicular pain (P = 0.0026) and back pain (P = 0.049) and myelopathy and statistically significant improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (P = 0.0032) compared to the preoperative value. No postoperative complications were detected in this series. Conclusion: This approach offers a safe technique for decompression and stabilization at lower thoracic and upper lumbar region. (2019ESJ178)\",\"PeriodicalId\":11610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ESJ.2019.7149.1086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ESJ.2019.7149.1086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景资料:累及D12/L1、L1/L2和L2/L3水平的上腰椎间盘突出比累及下腰椎间盘少见。在临床特征和手术处理方面,它们与腰椎下节段不同。椎管较低水平狭窄,可能累及多根脊神经根或髓圆锥,手术干预并发症发生率较高。目的:探讨手术治疗上腰椎间盘突出症的临床特点和手术效果。研究设计:回顾性临床队列研究。患者和方法:本研究包括20例诊断为上节段(T12-L1、L1-L2和L2-L3)椎间盘突出的患者。患者于2015年6月至2017年3月期间接受手术。所有患者均经椎突入路行椎弓根螺钉固定。收集了包括临床和神经预后以及放射影像在内的术后数据。术后随访评估包括术后即时医疗记录和术后18个月门诊就诊。采用神经根和背部疼痛视觉模拟量表和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)作为功能评分来评估患者的预后。结果:平均随访13±2.5个月,患者神经根痛(P = 0.0026)、背痛(P = 0.049)、脊髓病均较术前有显著改善,Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)较术前有显著改善(P = 0.0032)。本研究未发现术后并发症。结论:该入路为下胸椎和上腰椎区减压和稳定提供了安全的技术。(2019 esj178)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Herniated Disc at the Upper Lumbar Region: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes
Background Data: Upper lumbar disc herniation involving D12/L1, L1/L2, and L2/L3 levels is less prevalent than lower lumbar discs. In terms of clinical characteristics and surgical managements, they are different from those at the lower levels of the lumbar spine. Spinal canals are narrower than those of the lower levels, which may compromise multiple spinal nerve roots or conus medullaris with higher complication rate with surgical intervention. Purpose: To investigate the clinical features and surgical outcomes of patients operated on for upper lumbar disc herniations. Study Design: Retrospective clinical cohort study. Patients and Methods: This study included 20 patients diagnosed with herniated disc at upper levels (T12-L1, L1-L2, and L2-L3). Patients were operated on during the period between June 2015 to March 2017. All patients were operated on via transfacet approach with pedicle screw fixation. Postoperative data including clinical and neurological outcomes and radiographic imaging have been collected. Postoperative follow-up evaluation included immediate postoperative medical records and a postoperative visit to the outpatient clinic until 18 months postoperatively. Patients’ outcomes were assessed using Visual Analogue Scale of radicular and back pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) as functional score. Results: Over a mean follow-up period of 13±2.5 months, there was significant improvement in radicular pain (P = 0.0026) and back pain (P = 0.049) and myelopathy and statistically significant improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (P = 0.0032) compared to the preoperative value. No postoperative complications were detected in this series. Conclusion: This approach offers a safe technique for decompression and stabilization at lower thoracic and upper lumbar region. (2019ESJ178)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信