米多林预防三级转诊医院高危患者透析内低血压的回顾性研究

S. alhabardi, Maryam Aldhaefi, Mohammed Alessa, M. Alammari, Yousef A. Al-Rajhi, Rami Bustami
{"title":"米多林预防三级转诊医院高危患者透析内低血压的回顾性研究","authors":"S. alhabardi, Maryam Aldhaefi, Mohammed Alessa, M. Alammari, Yousef A. Al-Rajhi, Rami Bustami","doi":"10.21203/rs.2.17325/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background:\nIntradialytic hypotension (IDH) is the most common complication during hemodialysis procedure. Midodrine, an oral α-1 adrenergic agonist, is commonly used to prevent IDH. However, limited data is available to demonstrate midodrine effectiveness in prevention of IDH in high-risk hemodialysis patients.\nObjective:\nTo describe the clinical outcomes of using midodrine in patients receiving hemodialysis concerning the incidence of IDH. Also, we aimed to explore the appropriate dose for midodrine use to prevent IDH.\nMethodology\nA retrospective cohort of adult with end-stage-renal failure.\nExposure: Midodrine.\nOutcomes measure: IDH was defined as a decline in systolic blood pressure (SBP) by ≥20 mmHg or a decline in main arterial pressure (MAP) by ≥10 mmHg during hemodialysis session. Recurrent IDH was defined as three or more episodes of IDH throughout a year of starting midodrine.\nAnalysis: A descriptive analysis of the frequency of IDH and recurrent IDH. We also, compared the risk of recurrent IDH across various doses of midodrine use.\nResult:\nFrom a total of 68-screened patients’ charts, 45 patients were included in the final analysis. 41.8% (n=28) of the study population had an IDH that required additional interventions to restore the SBP and MAP. IDH occurred in 68% (n=19, P=0.03) of patients with hypoalbuminemia. Recurrent IDH occurred in 36% (n=16) of the patients over their hemodialysis procedure. Incidence of treatment failure (57%, p= 0.02) and recurrent IDH (36%, p=0.04) were statistically significant in patients who received midodrine three time per week (57%) in comparison to those who received more than three days per week\nConclusion:\nThis exploratory study shows that a considerable proportion of patients receiving midodrine did not develop IDH or recurrent IDH. A long-term follow-up study with larger number of patients in comparison to the control group would be useful to evaluate the magnitude of efficacy of midodrine in hemodialysis patients with high risk for IDH. Moreover, a future prospective trial that focus on an important clinical outcomes such as cardiovascular events and mortality with midodrin is warranted.","PeriodicalId":91747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hypertension and management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midodrine for Prevention of Intradialytic Hypotension in High Risk Patients at a Tertiary Referral Hospital: A Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"S. alhabardi, Maryam Aldhaefi, Mohammed Alessa, M. Alammari, Yousef A. Al-Rajhi, Rami Bustami\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.2.17325/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Background:\\nIntradialytic hypotension (IDH) is the most common complication during hemodialysis procedure. Midodrine, an oral α-1 adrenergic agonist, is commonly used to prevent IDH. However, limited data is available to demonstrate midodrine effectiveness in prevention of IDH in high-risk hemodialysis patients.\\nObjective:\\nTo describe the clinical outcomes of using midodrine in patients receiving hemodialysis concerning the incidence of IDH. Also, we aimed to explore the appropriate dose for midodrine use to prevent IDH.\\nMethodology\\nA retrospective cohort of adult with end-stage-renal failure.\\nExposure: Midodrine.\\nOutcomes measure: IDH was defined as a decline in systolic blood pressure (SBP) by ≥20 mmHg or a decline in main arterial pressure (MAP) by ≥10 mmHg during hemodialysis session. Recurrent IDH was defined as three or more episodes of IDH throughout a year of starting midodrine.\\nAnalysis: A descriptive analysis of the frequency of IDH and recurrent IDH. We also, compared the risk of recurrent IDH across various doses of midodrine use.\\nResult:\\nFrom a total of 68-screened patients’ charts, 45 patients were included in the final analysis. 41.8% (n=28) of the study population had an IDH that required additional interventions to restore the SBP and MAP. IDH occurred in 68% (n=19, P=0.03) of patients with hypoalbuminemia. Recurrent IDH occurred in 36% (n=16) of the patients over their hemodialysis procedure. Incidence of treatment failure (57%, p= 0.02) and recurrent IDH (36%, p=0.04) were statistically significant in patients who received midodrine three time per week (57%) in comparison to those who received more than three days per week\\nConclusion:\\nThis exploratory study shows that a considerable proportion of patients receiving midodrine did not develop IDH or recurrent IDH. A long-term follow-up study with larger number of patients in comparison to the control group would be useful to evaluate the magnitude of efficacy of midodrine in hemodialysis patients with high risk for IDH. Moreover, a future prospective trial that focus on an important clinical outcomes such as cardiovascular events and mortality with midodrin is warranted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hypertension and management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hypertension and management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.17325/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hypertension and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.17325/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:透析中低血压(IDH)是血液透析过程中最常见的并发症。米多林是一种口服α-1肾上腺素能激动剂,常用于预防IDH。然而,有限的数据可以证明米多林在高危血液透析患者预防IDH方面的有效性。目的:描述在血液透析患者中使用米多林治疗IDH的临床结果。此外,我们的目的是探索米多林预防IDH.的适当剂量。方法:一个对晚期肾功能衰竭成年人的回顾性队列研究。暴露:米多林。结果测量:IDH定义为血液透析期间收缩压(SBP)下降≥20mmHg或主动脉压(MAP)下降≥10mmHg。复发性IDH被定义为在开始midodrine的一年中出现三次或三次以上IDH。分析:IDH和复发IDH频率的描述性分析。我们还比较了不同剂量米多林使用后复发IDH的风险。结果:从总共68个筛选的患者图表中,45个患者被纳入最终分析。41.8%(n=28)的研究人群患有IDH,需要额外干预来恢复SBP和MAP。68%(n=19,P=0.03)的低白蛋白血症患者发生IDH。36%(n=16)的患者在血液透析过程中出现复发性IDH。与每周接受三天以上的患者相比,每周接受三次米多林的患者治疗失败(57%,p=0.02)和复发性IDH(36%,p=0.04)的发生率具有统计学意义。与对照组相比,对更多患者进行长期随访研究将有助于评估米多林在IDH高危血液透析患者中的疗效。此外,未来有必要进行一项前瞻性试验,重点关注米多林的心血管事件和死亡率等重要临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Midodrine for Prevention of Intradialytic Hypotension in High Risk Patients at a Tertiary Referral Hospital: A Retrospective Study
Background: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is the most common complication during hemodialysis procedure. Midodrine, an oral α-1 adrenergic agonist, is commonly used to prevent IDH. However, limited data is available to demonstrate midodrine effectiveness in prevention of IDH in high-risk hemodialysis patients. Objective: To describe the clinical outcomes of using midodrine in patients receiving hemodialysis concerning the incidence of IDH. Also, we aimed to explore the appropriate dose for midodrine use to prevent IDH. Methodology A retrospective cohort of adult with end-stage-renal failure. Exposure: Midodrine. Outcomes measure: IDH was defined as a decline in systolic blood pressure (SBP) by ≥20 mmHg or a decline in main arterial pressure (MAP) by ≥10 mmHg during hemodialysis session. Recurrent IDH was defined as three or more episodes of IDH throughout a year of starting midodrine. Analysis: A descriptive analysis of the frequency of IDH and recurrent IDH. We also, compared the risk of recurrent IDH across various doses of midodrine use. Result: From a total of 68-screened patients’ charts, 45 patients were included in the final analysis. 41.8% (n=28) of the study population had an IDH that required additional interventions to restore the SBP and MAP. IDH occurred in 68% (n=19, P=0.03) of patients with hypoalbuminemia. Recurrent IDH occurred in 36% (n=16) of the patients over their hemodialysis procedure. Incidence of treatment failure (57%, p= 0.02) and recurrent IDH (36%, p=0.04) were statistically significant in patients who received midodrine three time per week (57%) in comparison to those who received more than three days per week Conclusion: This exploratory study shows that a considerable proportion of patients receiving midodrine did not develop IDH or recurrent IDH. A long-term follow-up study with larger number of patients in comparison to the control group would be useful to evaluate the magnitude of efficacy of midodrine in hemodialysis patients with high risk for IDH. Moreover, a future prospective trial that focus on an important clinical outcomes such as cardiovascular events and mortality with midodrin is warranted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信