组织恶与管理责任与管理实践

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY
Marie-France Lebouc
{"title":"组织恶与管理责任与管理实践","authors":"Marie-France Lebouc","doi":"10.1386/ejpc_00034_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How is it that ordinary people decide to take part in genocides? Philosophers and psychologists have attempted to provide explanations of how genocidal organizations (i.e. set-up to conduct executions) bear on the moral judgement of genocide participants. Here, I resituate those findings within the field of human resource (HR) management. I highlight how basic principles of management and HR management (selection of personnel, division of labour, reinforcement methods and others) can lead ordinary individuals to judge their participation in a genocide as acceptable. Although initially only designed to increase motivation and productivity, these techniques also affect individuals’ awareness of ethical issues. Consequently, participants shift their judgements in favour of the genocidal organization, forgetting the victims. Management studies have seldom addressed the topic of genocide, despite clues in the literature that genocides are organizational in nature. By combining the three fields of management, business ethics and genocide studies within an approach based on transdisciplinary analysis, I hope to show that genocides constitute a legitimate subject for management studies.","PeriodicalId":40280,"journal":{"name":"Empedocles-European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizational evil and the responsibility of management and managerial practices\",\"authors\":\"Marie-France Lebouc\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/ejpc_00034_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How is it that ordinary people decide to take part in genocides? Philosophers and psychologists have attempted to provide explanations of how genocidal organizations (i.e. set-up to conduct executions) bear on the moral judgement of genocide participants. Here, I resituate those findings within the field of human resource (HR) management. I highlight how basic principles of management and HR management (selection of personnel, division of labour, reinforcement methods and others) can lead ordinary individuals to judge their participation in a genocide as acceptable. Although initially only designed to increase motivation and productivity, these techniques also affect individuals’ awareness of ethical issues. Consequently, participants shift their judgements in favour of the genocidal organization, forgetting the victims. Management studies have seldom addressed the topic of genocide, despite clues in the literature that genocides are organizational in nature. By combining the three fields of management, business ethics and genocide studies within an approach based on transdisciplinary analysis, I hope to show that genocides constitute a legitimate subject for management studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Empedocles-European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Empedocles-European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc_00034_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empedocles-European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc_00034_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

普通人是如何决定参与种族灭绝的?哲学家和心理学家试图解释种族灭绝组织(即执行死刑的组织)如何影响种族灭绝参与者的道德判断。在这里,我将这些发现应用于人力资源(HR)管理领域。我强调管理和人力资源管理的基本原则(人员选择、劳动分工、强化方法和其他)如何能使普通人判断他们参与种族灭绝是可以接受的。虽然最初只是为了提高积极性和生产力,但这些技术也会影响个人对道德问题的认识。因此,参与者将他们的判断转向支持种族灭绝组织,而忘记了受害者。管理研究很少涉及种族灭绝的话题,尽管文献中有线索表明种族灭绝本质上是有组织的。通过将管理学、商业伦理和种族灭绝研究这三个领域结合起来,采用一种基于跨学科分析的方法,我希望表明,种族灭绝是管理学研究的一个合理主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organizational evil and the responsibility of management and managerial practices
How is it that ordinary people decide to take part in genocides? Philosophers and psychologists have attempted to provide explanations of how genocidal organizations (i.e. set-up to conduct executions) bear on the moral judgement of genocide participants. Here, I resituate those findings within the field of human resource (HR) management. I highlight how basic principles of management and HR management (selection of personnel, division of labour, reinforcement methods and others) can lead ordinary individuals to judge their participation in a genocide as acceptable. Although initially only designed to increase motivation and productivity, these techniques also affect individuals’ awareness of ethical issues. Consequently, participants shift their judgements in favour of the genocidal organization, forgetting the victims. Management studies have seldom addressed the topic of genocide, despite clues in the literature that genocides are organizational in nature. By combining the three fields of management, business ethics and genocide studies within an approach based on transdisciplinary analysis, I hope to show that genocides constitute a legitimate subject for management studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信