巴西土著、歌伦波拉和环境政策和机构的威胁、削弱和破坏

Anderlany Aragão dos Santos, Marcela Menezes, Acácio Zuniga Leite, Sérgio Sauer
{"title":"巴西土著、歌伦波拉和环境政策和机构的威胁、削弱和破坏","authors":"Anderlany Aragão dos Santos, Marcela Menezes, Acácio Zuniga Leite, Sérgio Sauer","doi":"10.36920/esa-v29n3-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Focusing on neo-extractivism, this article analyzes the institutional weakening and dismantling of indigenous, quilombola and environmental policies. The reduction of budgets, weakening of management and removal of responsibilities (or deviation from function) of Funai, Fundacao Palmares, Incra and ICMBio in the recent period were subjected to analysis. Studies show that public agencies faced managerial instability, deepening institutional dismantling and loss of operational capacity, especially with the reduction of budgets and restrictions. The indigenous agency had to work with only a third of its normal workforce, due to a restriction of 90% of the budget, while the agency responsible for recognizing quilombola communities had its budget reduced by 58% in 2019 the lowest budget of the decade. The budget allocated to the demarcation and entitling of quilombola lands was reduced by 89% between 2014 and 2019. The ICMBio suffered less budget reduction, but experienced a process of militarization and the emptying of its powers. The study concludes that neo-extractive development, despite an initial period of social policies, income distribution and poverty reduction, is now, in the context of a 'return' of the ultra-neoliberal logic combined now with fundamentalist denial, threatening rights guaranteed in the Federal Constitution, such as the right to land and to an ecologically balanced environment.","PeriodicalId":33381,"journal":{"name":"Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ameaças, fragilização e desmonte de políticas e instituições indigenistas, quilombolas e ambientais no Brasil\",\"authors\":\"Anderlany Aragão dos Santos, Marcela Menezes, Acácio Zuniga Leite, Sérgio Sauer\",\"doi\":\"10.36920/esa-v29n3-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Focusing on neo-extractivism, this article analyzes the institutional weakening and dismantling of indigenous, quilombola and environmental policies. The reduction of budgets, weakening of management and removal of responsibilities (or deviation from function) of Funai, Fundacao Palmares, Incra and ICMBio in the recent period were subjected to analysis. Studies show that public agencies faced managerial instability, deepening institutional dismantling and loss of operational capacity, especially with the reduction of budgets and restrictions. The indigenous agency had to work with only a third of its normal workforce, due to a restriction of 90% of the budget, while the agency responsible for recognizing quilombola communities had its budget reduced by 58% in 2019 the lowest budget of the decade. The budget allocated to the demarcation and entitling of quilombola lands was reduced by 89% between 2014 and 2019. The ICMBio suffered less budget reduction, but experienced a process of militarization and the emptying of its powers. The study concludes that neo-extractive development, despite an initial period of social policies, income distribution and poverty reduction, is now, in the context of a 'return' of the ultra-neoliberal logic combined now with fundamentalist denial, threatening rights guaranteed in the Federal Constitution, such as the right to land and to an ecologically balanced environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36920/esa-v29n3-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36920/esa-v29n3-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文以新榨取主义为焦点,分析了土著政策、quilombola政策和环境政策的制度性弱化和瓦解。分析了最近期间Funai、Fundacao Palmares、Incra和ICMBio的预算减少、管理弱化和责任解除(或偏离职能)。研究表明,公共机构面临管理不稳定、机构解体加深和业务能力丧失的问题,特别是随着预算和限制的减少。由于90%的预算限制,土著机构只能使用正常劳动力的三分之一进行工作,而负责承认“歌隆波拉”社区的机构在2019年的预算减少了58%,这是十年来的最低预算。在2014年至2019年期间,分配给quilombola土地划界和授权的预算减少了89%。ICMBio的预算削减幅度较小,但经历了军事化和权力清空的过程。该研究的结论是,新采掘发展,尽管最初的社会政策,收入分配和减贫,现在,在极端新自由主义逻辑与原教旨主义否认相结合的“回归”背景下,威胁到联邦宪法保障的权利,如土地权和生态平衡环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ameaças, fragilização e desmonte de políticas e instituições indigenistas, quilombolas e ambientais no Brasil
Focusing on neo-extractivism, this article analyzes the institutional weakening and dismantling of indigenous, quilombola and environmental policies. The reduction of budgets, weakening of management and removal of responsibilities (or deviation from function) of Funai, Fundacao Palmares, Incra and ICMBio in the recent period were subjected to analysis. Studies show that public agencies faced managerial instability, deepening institutional dismantling and loss of operational capacity, especially with the reduction of budgets and restrictions. The indigenous agency had to work with only a third of its normal workforce, due to a restriction of 90% of the budget, while the agency responsible for recognizing quilombola communities had its budget reduced by 58% in 2019 the lowest budget of the decade. The budget allocated to the demarcation and entitling of quilombola lands was reduced by 89% between 2014 and 2019. The ICMBio suffered less budget reduction, but experienced a process of militarization and the emptying of its powers. The study concludes that neo-extractive development, despite an initial period of social policies, income distribution and poverty reduction, is now, in the context of a 'return' of the ultra-neoliberal logic combined now with fundamentalist denial, threatening rights guaranteed in the Federal Constitution, such as the right to land and to an ecologically balanced environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信