Yang Wang, Zhang Xu, Yujun Xu, Hua Gao, Li Hou, Rongrong Ji, Yan Zhang, Yanyan Zhao, Xiaokun Zhang, W. Li
{"title":"临床研究项目研究设计与分析的方法论质量评价","authors":"Yang Wang, Zhang Xu, Yujun Xu, Hua Gao, Li Hou, Rongrong Ji, Yan Zhang, Yanyan Zhao, Xiaokun Zhang, W. Li","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nClinical research is a critical procedure for the development of medicine. Reliability of the clinical research finding is determined by the quality of study design and analysis courses. It will also further impact the guideline development and clinical practice. This study was focus on the evaluation of clinical research quality during its whole process. \n \n \nMethods \nSubjects of this study were the clinical summary reports from a government funded project which were submitted in 2016. Standardized data collecting form had been used to capture the key features regarding to the quality of study design and data analysis. After the review of data accuracy, descriptive analysis had been carried to interpret the observed findings both for design and analysis aspects. \n \n \nResults \nThere were 67 project summary reports included in our analysis. The top three investigated therapeutic areas were oncology, cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases and orthopedics (19.4%, 11.9% and 11.9%). Most of studies fulfilled the evaluation criteria according to their original plan. 94% studies were strictly compliance with the original protocol with no interim amendment. Meanwhile, the report on sample size determination and appropriate use of multi-variable analysis should be improved. \n \n \nConclusions \nUsually, clinical research program can fulfill the evaluate goal according to funding requirements. But the methodology quality should be paid more attention. It is highly suggested to cooperate with the professional statistical team and do continuous improvement effort to enhance the validity of study findings. \n \n \nKey words: \nClinical research; Study design; Statistical analysis; Methodology quality","PeriodicalId":59555,"journal":{"name":"中华医学科研管理杂志","volume":"32 1","pages":"229-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodology quality assessment on study design and analysis of clinical research projects\",\"authors\":\"Yang Wang, Zhang Xu, Yujun Xu, Hua Gao, Li Hou, Rongrong Ji, Yan Zhang, Yanyan Zhao, Xiaokun Zhang, W. Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.03.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nClinical research is a critical procedure for the development of medicine. Reliability of the clinical research finding is determined by the quality of study design and analysis courses. It will also further impact the guideline development and clinical practice. This study was focus on the evaluation of clinical research quality during its whole process. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nSubjects of this study were the clinical summary reports from a government funded project which were submitted in 2016. Standardized data collecting form had been used to capture the key features regarding to the quality of study design and data analysis. After the review of data accuracy, descriptive analysis had been carried to interpret the observed findings both for design and analysis aspects. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThere were 67 project summary reports included in our analysis. The top three investigated therapeutic areas were oncology, cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases and orthopedics (19.4%, 11.9% and 11.9%). Most of studies fulfilled the evaluation criteria according to their original plan. 94% studies were strictly compliance with the original protocol with no interim amendment. Meanwhile, the report on sample size determination and appropriate use of multi-variable analysis should be improved. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nUsually, clinical research program can fulfill the evaluate goal according to funding requirements. But the methodology quality should be paid more attention. It is highly suggested to cooperate with the professional statistical team and do continuous improvement effort to enhance the validity of study findings. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nClinical research; Study design; Statistical analysis; Methodology quality\",\"PeriodicalId\":59555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华医学科研管理杂志\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"229-232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华医学科研管理杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.03.016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学科研管理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.03.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Methodology quality assessment on study design and analysis of clinical research projects
Objective
Clinical research is a critical procedure for the development of medicine. Reliability of the clinical research finding is determined by the quality of study design and analysis courses. It will also further impact the guideline development and clinical practice. This study was focus on the evaluation of clinical research quality during its whole process.
Methods
Subjects of this study were the clinical summary reports from a government funded project which were submitted in 2016. Standardized data collecting form had been used to capture the key features regarding to the quality of study design and data analysis. After the review of data accuracy, descriptive analysis had been carried to interpret the observed findings both for design and analysis aspects.
Results
There were 67 project summary reports included in our analysis. The top three investigated therapeutic areas were oncology, cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases and orthopedics (19.4%, 11.9% and 11.9%). Most of studies fulfilled the evaluation criteria according to their original plan. 94% studies were strictly compliance with the original protocol with no interim amendment. Meanwhile, the report on sample size determination and appropriate use of multi-variable analysis should be improved.
Conclusions
Usually, clinical research program can fulfill the evaluate goal according to funding requirements. But the methodology quality should be paid more attention. It is highly suggested to cooperate with the professional statistical team and do continuous improvement effort to enhance the validity of study findings.
Key words:
Clinical research; Study design; Statistical analysis; Methodology quality