欧洲公司治理中的行为经济学——对轻推小题大做?

Q2 Social Sciences
Marina B. Madsen
{"title":"欧洲公司治理中的行为经济学——对轻推小题大做?","authors":"Marina B. Madsen","doi":"10.54648/eulr2021011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shareholder engagement from institutional investors remains a topic on the agenda of both legislators and in the public debate. The recent amendment of the SRD can be seen as a token of a pan-European ‘hardening of shareholder norms’. The arising question is if this hardening is sufficient to change the behaviour of institutional investors. Using insights from behavioural economics, the article discusses if the European Union and national Member States can apply nudging or other insights from behavioural economics to increase shareholder engagement and argues that in order to follow a behaviourally informed strategy, a distinct justification of both the applied means and the pursued purposes is required.\nCorporate governance, European Union, shareholder engagement, active ownership, institutional investors, behavioural economics, choice architecture, nudging, biases, libertarian paternalism","PeriodicalId":53431,"journal":{"name":"European Business Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behavioural Economics in European Corporate Governance – Much Ado about Nudging?\",\"authors\":\"Marina B. Madsen\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/eulr2021011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Shareholder engagement from institutional investors remains a topic on the agenda of both legislators and in the public debate. The recent amendment of the SRD can be seen as a token of a pan-European ‘hardening of shareholder norms’. The arising question is if this hardening is sufficient to change the behaviour of institutional investors. Using insights from behavioural economics, the article discusses if the European Union and national Member States can apply nudging or other insights from behavioural economics to increase shareholder engagement and argues that in order to follow a behaviourally informed strategy, a distinct justification of both the applied means and the pursued purposes is required.\\nCorporate governance, European Union, shareholder engagement, active ownership, institutional investors, behavioural economics, choice architecture, nudging, biases, libertarian paternalism\",\"PeriodicalId\":53431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Business Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Business Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2021011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Business Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2021011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

机构投资者的股东参与仍然是立法者和公众辩论议程上的一个话题。最近对SRD的修订可以被视为泛欧“强化股东规范”的标志。出现的问题是,这种强硬态度是否足以改变机构投资者的行为。本文利用行为经济学的见解,讨论了欧盟和成员国是否可以应用行为经济学的推动或其他见解来增加股东参与,并认为为了遵循行为知情的战略,需要对应用手段和追求的目的进行明确的论证。公司治理、欧盟、股东参与、主动所有权、机构投资者、行为经济学、选择架构、轻推、偏见、自由主义家长式作风
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Behavioural Economics in European Corporate Governance – Much Ado about Nudging?
Shareholder engagement from institutional investors remains a topic on the agenda of both legislators and in the public debate. The recent amendment of the SRD can be seen as a token of a pan-European ‘hardening of shareholder norms’. The arising question is if this hardening is sufficient to change the behaviour of institutional investors. Using insights from behavioural economics, the article discusses if the European Union and national Member States can apply nudging or other insights from behavioural economics to increase shareholder engagement and argues that in order to follow a behaviourally informed strategy, a distinct justification of both the applied means and the pursued purposes is required. Corporate governance, European Union, shareholder engagement, active ownership, institutional investors, behavioural economics, choice architecture, nudging, biases, libertarian paternalism
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Business Law Review
European Business Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The mission of the European Business Law Review is to provide a forum for analysis and discussion of business law, including European Union law and the laws of the Member States and other European countries, as well as legal frameworks and issues in international and comparative contexts. The Review moves freely over the boundaries that divide the law, and covers business law, broadly defined, in public or private law, domestic, European or international law. Our topics of interest include commercial, financial, corporate, private and regulatory laws with a broadly business dimension. The Review offers current, authoritative scholarship on a wide range of issues and developments, featuring contributors providing an international as well as a European perspective. The Review is an invaluable source of current scholarship, information, practical analysis, and expert guidance for all practising lawyers, advisers, and scholars dealing with European business law on a regular basis. The Review has over 25 years established the highest scholarly standards. It distinguishes itself as open-minded, embracing interests that appeal to the scholarly, practitioner and policy-making spheres. It practices strict routines of peer review. The Review imposes no word limit on submissions, subject to the appropriateness of the word length to the subject under discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信