上演拿骚-迪茨身份:17世纪弗里斯兰拿骚宫廷的丧葬文化和管理继承

Q3 Arts and Humanities
L.H.B. Nissen
{"title":"上演拿骚-迪茨身份:17世纪弗里斯兰拿骚宫廷的丧葬文化和管理继承","authors":"L.H.B. Nissen","doi":"10.1080/14629712.2020.1728931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The time after the death of a prince was crucial for a dynasty to safeguard titles, possessions and other privileges for future generations. Whereas official agreements arranged the deceased’s succession on paper, funerary culture provided dynasties with opportunities to legitimise and consolidate their position. This article focuses on the funeral of Ernest Casimir, Count of Nassau-Dietz (1573–1632) and stadtholder of Friesland, Groningen, and Drenthe. It unravels the main themes in the dynastic identity of the Nassau-Dietz family and examines how this identity helped the dynasty protect its hold on the non-hereditary office of stadtholder. Furthermore, it aims to demonstrate that the direct relatives of the deceased were not the only stakeholders in the process of identity construction after Ernest Casimir’s death; local political elites were closely involved as well.","PeriodicalId":37034,"journal":{"name":"Court Historian","volume":"25 1","pages":"15 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14629712.2020.1728931","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Staging the Nassau-Dietz Identity: Funerary Culture and Managing Succession at the Frisian Nassau Court in the Seventeenth Century\",\"authors\":\"L.H.B. Nissen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14629712.2020.1728931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The time after the death of a prince was crucial for a dynasty to safeguard titles, possessions and other privileges for future generations. Whereas official agreements arranged the deceased’s succession on paper, funerary culture provided dynasties with opportunities to legitimise and consolidate their position. This article focuses on the funeral of Ernest Casimir, Count of Nassau-Dietz (1573–1632) and stadtholder of Friesland, Groningen, and Drenthe. It unravels the main themes in the dynastic identity of the Nassau-Dietz family and examines how this identity helped the dynasty protect its hold on the non-hereditary office of stadtholder. Furthermore, it aims to demonstrate that the direct relatives of the deceased were not the only stakeholders in the process of identity construction after Ernest Casimir’s death; local political elites were closely involved as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Court Historian\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"15 - 30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14629712.2020.1728931\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Court Historian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14629712.2020.1728931\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Court Historian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14629712.2020.1728931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

王子死后的这段时间是王朝为后代保护头衔、财产和其他特权的关键时期。虽然官方协议将死者的继承安排在纸上,但丧葬文化为王朝提供了合法化和巩固其地位的机会。本文主要讲述拿骚-迪茨伯爵(1573-1632)、弗里斯兰、格罗宁根和德伦特总督欧内斯特·卡西米尔的葬礼。它揭示了拿骚-迪茨家族王朝身份的主要主题,并研究了这种身份如何帮助王朝保护其对非世袭的执政职位的控制。此外,本文旨在证明死者的直系亲属并不是欧内斯特·卡西米尔死后身份建构过程中的唯一利益相关者;当地的政治精英也密切参与其中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Staging the Nassau-Dietz Identity: Funerary Culture and Managing Succession at the Frisian Nassau Court in the Seventeenth Century
The time after the death of a prince was crucial for a dynasty to safeguard titles, possessions and other privileges for future generations. Whereas official agreements arranged the deceased’s succession on paper, funerary culture provided dynasties with opportunities to legitimise and consolidate their position. This article focuses on the funeral of Ernest Casimir, Count of Nassau-Dietz (1573–1632) and stadtholder of Friesland, Groningen, and Drenthe. It unravels the main themes in the dynastic identity of the Nassau-Dietz family and examines how this identity helped the dynasty protect its hold on the non-hereditary office of stadtholder. Furthermore, it aims to demonstrate that the direct relatives of the deceased were not the only stakeholders in the process of identity construction after Ernest Casimir’s death; local political elites were closely involved as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Court Historian
Court Historian Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信