对反种族主义工程的建议:告知机构议程以提高黑人工程学生的经验

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Brooke Coley, Debalina Maitra, Trevonte McClain
{"title":"对反种族主义工程的建议:告知机构议程以提高黑人工程学生的经验","authors":"Brooke Coley, Debalina Maitra, Trevonte McClain","doi":"10.1177/14782103231184754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This qualitative study collected recommendations provided by Black doctoral students in engineering to explicitly inform the institutional efforts necessary to enhance their academic experiences. This process has informed what needs to be done to support Black students through their direct accounts that provided in-depth understanding of the impactful yet missing components in their engineering pursuits, and especially, at the Ph.D. level. Situated in the theories of racialized organizations, this community-based participatory action research project conducted semi-structured interviews with n = 24 Black doctoral students enrolled in engineering programs across the United States (and one abroad). Four recommendations themes emerged from our analysis: (1) a vital need for greater representation of Black scholars across roles in engineering communities; (2) capacity for awareness, acknowledgment, and accountability of/for the lived experience of Black scholars in engineering; (3) more intentional institutional efforts to support Black scholar communities and connection; and (4) a need for re-envisioning institutional policies and practices impacting Black scholars. This paper will address that which Black students identify as missing in engineering academic environments that, if addressed, could stand to drastically improve the lived experience of Black engineering students. Institutions must be proactive in their accountability for the wellness and success for all students and can start by taking heed to the recommendations of Black doctoral students, specifically.","PeriodicalId":46984,"journal":{"name":"Policy Futures in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations toward an antiracist engineering: Informing an institutional agenda to enhance Black engineering student experiences\",\"authors\":\"Brooke Coley, Debalina Maitra, Trevonte McClain\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14782103231184754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This qualitative study collected recommendations provided by Black doctoral students in engineering to explicitly inform the institutional efforts necessary to enhance their academic experiences. This process has informed what needs to be done to support Black students through their direct accounts that provided in-depth understanding of the impactful yet missing components in their engineering pursuits, and especially, at the Ph.D. level. Situated in the theories of racialized organizations, this community-based participatory action research project conducted semi-structured interviews with n = 24 Black doctoral students enrolled in engineering programs across the United States (and one abroad). Four recommendations themes emerged from our analysis: (1) a vital need for greater representation of Black scholars across roles in engineering communities; (2) capacity for awareness, acknowledgment, and accountability of/for the lived experience of Black scholars in engineering; (3) more intentional institutional efforts to support Black scholar communities and connection; and (4) a need for re-envisioning institutional policies and practices impacting Black scholars. This paper will address that which Black students identify as missing in engineering academic environments that, if addressed, could stand to drastically improve the lived experience of Black engineering students. Institutions must be proactive in their accountability for the wellness and success for all students and can start by taking heed to the recommendations of Black doctoral students, specifically.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy Futures in Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy Futures in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103231184754\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Futures in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103231184754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项定性研究收集了黑人工程博士生提供的建议,明确告知了提高他们学术经验所需的机构努力。这一过程为黑人学生提供了需要做些什么来支持他们的直接账户,这些账户深入了解了他们在工程追求中,尤其是在博士阶段,有影响力但缺失的组成部分。这个基于社区的参与性行动研究项目以种族化组织的理论为基础,对美国各地(以及一名国外)注册的24名黑人博士生进行了半结构化采访。我们的分析提出了四个建议主题:(1)迫切需要黑人学者在工程社区中发挥更大的代表性;(2) 对黑人学者在工程领域的生活经历的认识、认可和问责能力;(3) 更有针对性的机构努力,支持黑人学者社区和联系;以及(4)需要重新设想影响黑人学者的制度政策和做法。这篇论文将解决黑人学生在工程学术环境中认为缺失的问题,如果解决这些问题,将大大改善黑人工程学生的生活体验。各院校必须积极主动地为所有学生的健康和成功负责,并可以从听取黑人博士生的建议开始,特别是。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recommendations toward an antiracist engineering: Informing an institutional agenda to enhance Black engineering student experiences
This qualitative study collected recommendations provided by Black doctoral students in engineering to explicitly inform the institutional efforts necessary to enhance their academic experiences. This process has informed what needs to be done to support Black students through their direct accounts that provided in-depth understanding of the impactful yet missing components in their engineering pursuits, and especially, at the Ph.D. level. Situated in the theories of racialized organizations, this community-based participatory action research project conducted semi-structured interviews with n = 24 Black doctoral students enrolled in engineering programs across the United States (and one abroad). Four recommendations themes emerged from our analysis: (1) a vital need for greater representation of Black scholars across roles in engineering communities; (2) capacity for awareness, acknowledgment, and accountability of/for the lived experience of Black scholars in engineering; (3) more intentional institutional efforts to support Black scholar communities and connection; and (4) a need for re-envisioning institutional policies and practices impacting Black scholars. This paper will address that which Black students identify as missing in engineering academic environments that, if addressed, could stand to drastically improve the lived experience of Black engineering students. Institutions must be proactive in their accountability for the wellness and success for all students and can start by taking heed to the recommendations of Black doctoral students, specifically.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policy Futures in Education
Policy Futures in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信