女性、工程和性别平等:巴西和美国的路径

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Denise Almeida de Andrade, Chiquita D. Howard-Bostic, M. Machado
{"title":"女性、工程和性别平等:巴西和美国的路径","authors":"Denise Almeida de Andrade, Chiquita D. Howard-Bostic, M. Machado","doi":"10.9732/2020.v121.842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The task of discussing gender equity in society remains challenging, and new systemic strate-gies are needed to increase women’s participation in leading professions. Two decades after the 21st century, inequality between men and women continues to produce detrimental effects that reproduce past discriminatory behaviors and actions. We argue that professional training, financial support, economic autonomy, and structural adjustments are essential for women to overcome barriers of gender equity. Likewise, realizing that countries have expressly indicated that technology, engineering, and innovation are essential to development, we intend to focus our attention to the male domination in the field of engineering. We will analyze women’s enrollment in engineering courses in Brazil to explain why men are a demographic majority in the profession. Given this international reality, we also plan to show how access to the knowledge areas of engineering and dispari-ties in the study of engineering is also relevant in the United States. This study finds that the knowledge gap begins with differential socialization and development of girls and boys, who are presented with stereotypes that permeate and influence their perceptions, profes sional choices, and performance in the workplace. Fewer girls than boys choose engineering as a field and after the 20 years of service, greater than 30% of women have not remained in the engineering field. Even when women are technically prepared, they may experience stereotype threat, which can adversely impact their performance in the field. The reports show a peculiarity of patterns of “tantrums” displayed by women. That is to say, when choosing this profession, women have been opposed to the expectations and desires of family members and society in general; they have been resistant to a gender ideology that has signaled (and still signals) professional fields that are suitable for women. This resistance via a “tantrum” was present in reports of older and younger women, suggesting the permanence of gender patterns and images linked to profession’ choices in the last thirty years in Brazil. More than 70% of the students who obtained the thousand highest marks in the National High School Exam (Enem) are boys. Howe-ver, girls are the majority among the candidates. Data tabulated by the ‘State’ also shows that the total number of young men do better in the four areas charged by the country’s most important assessment. The greatest difference is in Mathematics and Natural Sciences exams (CAFARDO; TOLEDO, 2018, [s.p.]).","PeriodicalId":53782,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Estudos Politicos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women, engineering and gender equality: Brazil and United States pathway\",\"authors\":\"Denise Almeida de Andrade, Chiquita D. Howard-Bostic, M. Machado\",\"doi\":\"10.9732/2020.v121.842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": The task of discussing gender equity in society remains challenging, and new systemic strate-gies are needed to increase women’s participation in leading professions. Two decades after the 21st century, inequality between men and women continues to produce detrimental effects that reproduce past discriminatory behaviors and actions. We argue that professional training, financial support, economic autonomy, and structural adjustments are essential for women to overcome barriers of gender equity. Likewise, realizing that countries have expressly indicated that technology, engineering, and innovation are essential to development, we intend to focus our attention to the male domination in the field of engineering. We will analyze women’s enrollment in engineering courses in Brazil to explain why men are a demographic majority in the profession. Given this international reality, we also plan to show how access to the knowledge areas of engineering and dispari-ties in the study of engineering is also relevant in the United States. This study finds that the knowledge gap begins with differential socialization and development of girls and boys, who are presented with stereotypes that permeate and influence their perceptions, profes sional choices, and performance in the workplace. Fewer girls than boys choose engineering as a field and after the 20 years of service, greater than 30% of women have not remained in the engineering field. Even when women are technically prepared, they may experience stereotype threat, which can adversely impact their performance in the field. The reports show a peculiarity of patterns of “tantrums” displayed by women. That is to say, when choosing this profession, women have been opposed to the expectations and desires of family members and society in general; they have been resistant to a gender ideology that has signaled (and still signals) professional fields that are suitable for women. This resistance via a “tantrum” was present in reports of older and younger women, suggesting the permanence of gender patterns and images linked to profession’ choices in the last thirty years in Brazil. More than 70% of the students who obtained the thousand highest marks in the National High School Exam (Enem) are boys. Howe-ver, girls are the majority among the candidates. Data tabulated by the ‘State’ also shows that the total number of young men do better in the four areas charged by the country’s most important assessment. The greatest difference is in Mathematics and Natural Sciences exams (CAFARDO; TOLEDO, 2018, [s.p.]).\",\"PeriodicalId\":53782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Estudos Politicos\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Estudos Politicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9732/2020.v121.842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Estudos Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9732/2020.v121.842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

:讨论社会性别平等的任务仍然具有挑战性,需要新的系统战略来增加妇女在主要职业中的参与。21世纪后二十年,男女不平等继续产生有害影响,重现过去的歧视性行为和行动。我们认为,专业培训、财政支持、经济自主和结构调整对女性克服性别平等障碍至关重要。同样,意识到各国已经明确表示,技术、工程和创新对发展至关重要,我们打算把注意力集中在男性在工程领域的统治上。我们将分析巴西女性在工程课程中的注册情况,以解释为什么男性在该职业中占多数。鉴于这一国际现实,我们还计划展示如何获得工程知识领域和工程研究中的不平等在美国也是相关的。本研究发现,知识差距始于女孩和男孩的不同社会化和发展,他们的刻板印象渗透并影响他们的观念、专业选择和工作场所的表现。选择工程专业的女生比男生少,而且在服役20年后,超过30%的女性没有继续留在工程领域。即使女性在技术上做好了准备,她们也可能会遇到刻板印象威胁,这可能会对她们在该领域的表现产生不利影响。报告显示了女性“发脾气”的特殊模式。也就是说,在选择这一职业时,女性一直反对家庭成员和整个社会的期望和愿望;她们一直抵制一种性别意识形态,这种意识形态已经表明(现在仍然表明)专业领域适合女性。这种通过“发脾气”的反抗在老年和年轻女性的报告中都有体现,这表明在过去30年里,巴西与职业选择相关的性别模式和形象是永久性的。在全国高中考试(Enem)中获得1000分最高分的学生中,超过70%是男孩。然而,在候选人中,女孩占多数。“国家”制表的数据还显示,青年男子的总数在该国最重要的评估所涉及的四个领域做得更好。最大的不同是在数学和自然科学考试(CAFARDO;托莱多,2018,[p.])。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Women, engineering and gender equality: Brazil and United States pathway
: The task of discussing gender equity in society remains challenging, and new systemic strate-gies are needed to increase women’s participation in leading professions. Two decades after the 21st century, inequality between men and women continues to produce detrimental effects that reproduce past discriminatory behaviors and actions. We argue that professional training, financial support, economic autonomy, and structural adjustments are essential for women to overcome barriers of gender equity. Likewise, realizing that countries have expressly indicated that technology, engineering, and innovation are essential to development, we intend to focus our attention to the male domination in the field of engineering. We will analyze women’s enrollment in engineering courses in Brazil to explain why men are a demographic majority in the profession. Given this international reality, we also plan to show how access to the knowledge areas of engineering and dispari-ties in the study of engineering is also relevant in the United States. This study finds that the knowledge gap begins with differential socialization and development of girls and boys, who are presented with stereotypes that permeate and influence their perceptions, profes sional choices, and performance in the workplace. Fewer girls than boys choose engineering as a field and after the 20 years of service, greater than 30% of women have not remained in the engineering field. Even when women are technically prepared, they may experience stereotype threat, which can adversely impact their performance in the field. The reports show a peculiarity of patterns of “tantrums” displayed by women. That is to say, when choosing this profession, women have been opposed to the expectations and desires of family members and society in general; they have been resistant to a gender ideology that has signaled (and still signals) professional fields that are suitable for women. This resistance via a “tantrum” was present in reports of older and younger women, suggesting the permanence of gender patterns and images linked to profession’ choices in the last thirty years in Brazil. More than 70% of the students who obtained the thousand highest marks in the National High School Exam (Enem) are boys. Howe-ver, girls are the majority among the candidates. Data tabulated by the ‘State’ also shows that the total number of young men do better in the four areas charged by the country’s most important assessment. The greatest difference is in Mathematics and Natural Sciences exams (CAFARDO; TOLEDO, 2018, [s.p.]).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
66.70%
发文量
16
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信