论文中的领土和语言划分Kärnten/Koroška

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Roland W. Peball, Klaus Schoenberger
{"title":"论文中的领土和语言划分Kärnten/Koroška","authors":"Roland W. Peball, Klaus Schoenberger","doi":"10.3986/traditio2021500105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In southern Carinthia (Kärnten/Koroška), a conflict over the rights and oppression of the Slovenian-speaking minority has been smoldering for one hundred years, since the military border conflict of 1918/19 and the plebiscite agreed upon in the Treaty of St. Germain. The plebiscite was on the question of whether southern Carinthia should join the rump state of the former Habsburg monarchy, German-Austria, or the newly created SHS. In 1920, the majority of the resident population (both the German Carinthians and the Slovenian minority) decided in favor of Austria. In the following decades an unrelenting struggle for language and memory was waged by German-nationalist-minded representatives of the German Carinthian majority against the minority. This article analyzes the thematization of linguistic and territorial demarcations in the dispositif Kärnten/Koroška.","PeriodicalId":35228,"journal":{"name":"Traditiones","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Territorial and Linguistic Demarcations in the Dispositif Kärnten/Koroška\",\"authors\":\"Roland W. Peball, Klaus Schoenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.3986/traditio2021500105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In southern Carinthia (Kärnten/Koroška), a conflict over the rights and oppression of the Slovenian-speaking minority has been smoldering for one hundred years, since the military border conflict of 1918/19 and the plebiscite agreed upon in the Treaty of St. Germain. The plebiscite was on the question of whether southern Carinthia should join the rump state of the former Habsburg monarchy, German-Austria, or the newly created SHS. In 1920, the majority of the resident population (both the German Carinthians and the Slovenian minority) decided in favor of Austria. In the following decades an unrelenting struggle for language and memory was waged by German-nationalist-minded representatives of the German Carinthian majority against the minority. This article analyzes the thematization of linguistic and territorial demarcations in the dispositif Kärnten/Koroška.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traditiones\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traditiones\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3986/traditio2021500105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traditiones","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3986/traditio2021500105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在卡林西亚南部(Kaërnten/KorošKa),自1918/19年军事边界冲突和《圣日耳曼条约》商定的公民投票以来,关于斯洛文尼亚语少数民族权利和压迫的冲突已经持续了一百年。公民投票的问题是,南卡林西亚是否应该加入前哈布斯堡君主制的残余国家德意志奥地利,还是新成立的SHS。1920年,大多数居民(包括德国卡林西亚人和斯洛文尼亚少数民族)决定支持奥地利。在接下来的几十年里,具有民族主义思想的德国卡林派多数派代表与少数派进行了一场无情的语言和记忆斗争。本文分析了Kaërnten/KorošKa处置中语言和领土划分的主题化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Territorial and Linguistic Demarcations in the Dispositif Kärnten/Koroška
In southern Carinthia (Kärnten/Koroška), a conflict over the rights and oppression of the Slovenian-speaking minority has been smoldering for one hundred years, since the military border conflict of 1918/19 and the plebiscite agreed upon in the Treaty of St. Germain. The plebiscite was on the question of whether southern Carinthia should join the rump state of the former Habsburg monarchy, German-Austria, or the newly created SHS. In 1920, the majority of the resident population (both the German Carinthians and the Slovenian minority) decided in favor of Austria. In the following decades an unrelenting struggle for language and memory was waged by German-nationalist-minded representatives of the German Carinthian majority against the minority. This article analyzes the thematization of linguistic and territorial demarcations in the dispositif Kärnten/Koroška.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Traditiones
Traditiones Arts and Humanities-Music
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信