再生药物能改善动脉桥接神经缺损后周围神经的功能恢复吗?

G. Alexopoulos, L. Pavlidis, M. Tsagarakis, A. Delimpaltas, Antonios Tsimponis, A. Papalois, A. Batistatou, A. Papoudou-Bai, D. Barritault, E. Demiri, G. Spyropoulou
{"title":"再生药物能改善动脉桥接神经缺损后周围神经的功能恢复吗?","authors":"G. Alexopoulos, L. Pavlidis, M. Tsagarakis, A. Delimpaltas, Antonios Tsimponis, A. Papalois, A. Batistatou, A. Papoudou-Bai, D. Barritault, E. Demiri, G. Spyropoulou","doi":"10.1055/s-0039-1692453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to use artery grafts filled with CACIPLIQ20 and see if they promote nerve regeneration. Methods Sixty male Wistar rats were used. The rats were randomly divided into four experimental groups (n = 15): transected control group (negative control group [NCG]), sham-operated group (positive control group [SO]) artery graft group filled with saline (AG/NS), and CACIPLIQ20-treated group (AG/CACIPLIQ20). Fifteen rats were used as artery graft donors. In the SO group, the sciatic nerve was dissected from the surrounding tissues and left intact. In the NCG, AG/NS and AG/CACIPLIQ20) groups, a 10-mm gap was created in the left sciatic nerve. In the NCG group, the gap was not bridged with a graft. In the AG/NS group, the gap was bridged with a graft filled with saline. In the AG/CACIPLIQ20 group, the graft was filled with CACIPLIQ20. Walking track analysis was performed at 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks after surgery. At 16 weeks postoperatively, the rats were sacrificed, nerve sections were harvested for histopathology analysis, and the weight ratio of the gastrocnemius muscle was measured. Results There was no significant difference in myelin sheath thickness between the AG/NS and AG/CACIPLIQ20 groups. Muscle weight in the AG/CACIPLIQ20 group was higher but not statistically significant (p = 0.168) compared with the AG/NS group. Also, AG/CACIPLIQ20 mean was better than AG/NS mean, although there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.605). Conclusion There could be an indication that CACIPLIQ20 improves functional recovery of a transected peripheral nerve through a nerve gap bridged with an artery graft.","PeriodicalId":34024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Open","volume":"04 1","pages":"e47 - e53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0039-1692453","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can ReGeneraTing Agents Improve Functional Recovery of Transected Peripheral Nerve through a Nerve Gap Bridged with an Artery Graft?\",\"authors\":\"G. Alexopoulos, L. Pavlidis, M. Tsagarakis, A. Delimpaltas, Antonios Tsimponis, A. Papalois, A. Batistatou, A. Papoudou-Bai, D. Barritault, E. Demiri, G. Spyropoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0039-1692453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to use artery grafts filled with CACIPLIQ20 and see if they promote nerve regeneration. Methods Sixty male Wistar rats were used. The rats were randomly divided into four experimental groups (n = 15): transected control group (negative control group [NCG]), sham-operated group (positive control group [SO]) artery graft group filled with saline (AG/NS), and CACIPLIQ20-treated group (AG/CACIPLIQ20). Fifteen rats were used as artery graft donors. In the SO group, the sciatic nerve was dissected from the surrounding tissues and left intact. In the NCG, AG/NS and AG/CACIPLIQ20) groups, a 10-mm gap was created in the left sciatic nerve. In the NCG group, the gap was not bridged with a graft. In the AG/NS group, the gap was bridged with a graft filled with saline. In the AG/CACIPLIQ20 group, the graft was filled with CACIPLIQ20. Walking track analysis was performed at 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks after surgery. At 16 weeks postoperatively, the rats were sacrificed, nerve sections were harvested for histopathology analysis, and the weight ratio of the gastrocnemius muscle was measured. Results There was no significant difference in myelin sheath thickness between the AG/NS and AG/CACIPLIQ20 groups. Muscle weight in the AG/CACIPLIQ20 group was higher but not statistically significant (p = 0.168) compared with the AG/NS group. Also, AG/CACIPLIQ20 mean was better than AG/NS mean, although there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.605). Conclusion There could be an indication that CACIPLIQ20 improves functional recovery of a transected peripheral nerve through a nerve gap bridged with an artery graft.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Open\",\"volume\":\"04 1\",\"pages\":\"e47 - e53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0039-1692453\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1692453\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1692453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是使用填充CACIPLIQ20的动脉移植物,观察其是否促进神经再生。方法选用雄性Wistar大鼠60只。将大鼠随机分为4个实验组(n = 15):横切对照组(阴性对照组[NCG])、假手术组(阳性对照组[SO])、生理盐水灌注动脉移植组(AG/NS)、CACIPLIQ20治疗组(AG/CACIPLIQ20)。15只大鼠作为动脉移植供体。在SO组中,将坐骨神经从周围组织中剥离并保持完整。在NCG、AG/NS和AG/CACIPLIQ20组中,左侧坐骨神经形成10mm间隙。在NCG组中,缺口没有用移植物桥接。在AG/NS组,用填充生理盐水的移植物桥接间隙。在AG/CACIPLIQ20组,移植物充满CACIPLIQ20。在术后4、8、12和16周进行行走轨迹分析。术后16周处死大鼠,取神经切片进行组织病理学分析,测量腓肠肌重量比。结果AG/NS组和AG/CACIPLIQ20组大鼠髓鞘厚度差异无统计学意义。AG/CACIPLIQ20组肌肉质量高于AG/NS组,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.168)。AG/CACIPLIQ20平均值优于AG/NS平均值,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.605)。结论CACIPLIQ20可通过动脉桥接的神经间隙改善周围神经的功能恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can ReGeneraTing Agents Improve Functional Recovery of Transected Peripheral Nerve through a Nerve Gap Bridged with an Artery Graft?
Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to use artery grafts filled with CACIPLIQ20 and see if they promote nerve regeneration. Methods Sixty male Wistar rats were used. The rats were randomly divided into four experimental groups (n = 15): transected control group (negative control group [NCG]), sham-operated group (positive control group [SO]) artery graft group filled with saline (AG/NS), and CACIPLIQ20-treated group (AG/CACIPLIQ20). Fifteen rats were used as artery graft donors. In the SO group, the sciatic nerve was dissected from the surrounding tissues and left intact. In the NCG, AG/NS and AG/CACIPLIQ20) groups, a 10-mm gap was created in the left sciatic nerve. In the NCG group, the gap was not bridged with a graft. In the AG/NS group, the gap was bridged with a graft filled with saline. In the AG/CACIPLIQ20 group, the graft was filled with CACIPLIQ20. Walking track analysis was performed at 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks after surgery. At 16 weeks postoperatively, the rats were sacrificed, nerve sections were harvested for histopathology analysis, and the weight ratio of the gastrocnemius muscle was measured. Results There was no significant difference in myelin sheath thickness between the AG/NS and AG/CACIPLIQ20 groups. Muscle weight in the AG/CACIPLIQ20 group was higher but not statistically significant (p = 0.168) compared with the AG/NS group. Also, AG/CACIPLIQ20 mean was better than AG/NS mean, although there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.605). Conclusion There could be an indication that CACIPLIQ20 improves functional recovery of a transected peripheral nerve through a nerve gap bridged with an artery graft.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信