儿童癌症幸存者家庭成员的创伤后成长——一项最新的系统综述

Berglind Halldórsdóttir, G. Michel, Julia Baenziger
{"title":"儿童癌症幸存者家庭成员的创伤后成长——一项最新的系统综述","authors":"Berglind Halldórsdóttir, G. Michel, Julia Baenziger","doi":"10.1097/OR9.0000000000000087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Childhood cancer affects not only the patients, but their entire family. We systematically reviewed recent evidence of post-traumatic growth (PTG) among family members of childhood cancer survivors (CCS). Methods: We updated a systematic review of PTG among family members of CCS (including new evidence from March 2010 to December 2021). We screened 4 databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and SCOPUS). Key study information and results were extracted for the quality appraisal. We narratively synthesized the evidence for reported levels and domains of PTG in caregivers (aim 1) and siblings (aim 2) and associated sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics (aim 3) in families of CCS. Results: Of the 646 identified articles, 16 met eligibility criteria. Eleven studies used quantitative (all cross-sectional), 3 qualitative, and 2 mixed methods. Participants included parents and other primary caregivers (11 studies), grandparents (1 study), and siblings (5 studies). Most caregivers reported high levels of PTG, most often involving personal growth and stronger/closer family relationships. Siblings reported low-to-moderate PTG, with an emphasis on appreciating life and becoming more independent and mature. While sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were not associated with PTG, psychosocial factors such as personal resources, including social support and coping strategies, were associated with PTG outcomes. Conclusion: In the past decade, few studies have assessed PTG among families of CCS despite the call to focus on families in a previous review. We found that social support and proactive coping strategies may be the most helpful in promoting PTG.","PeriodicalId":73915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-traumatic growth in family members of childhood cancer survivors—an updated systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Berglind Halldórsdóttir, G. Michel, Julia Baenziger\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OR9.0000000000000087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: Childhood cancer affects not only the patients, but their entire family. We systematically reviewed recent evidence of post-traumatic growth (PTG) among family members of childhood cancer survivors (CCS). Methods: We updated a systematic review of PTG among family members of CCS (including new evidence from March 2010 to December 2021). We screened 4 databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and SCOPUS). Key study information and results were extracted for the quality appraisal. We narratively synthesized the evidence for reported levels and domains of PTG in caregivers (aim 1) and siblings (aim 2) and associated sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics (aim 3) in families of CCS. Results: Of the 646 identified articles, 16 met eligibility criteria. Eleven studies used quantitative (all cross-sectional), 3 qualitative, and 2 mixed methods. Participants included parents and other primary caregivers (11 studies), grandparents (1 study), and siblings (5 studies). Most caregivers reported high levels of PTG, most often involving personal growth and stronger/closer family relationships. Siblings reported low-to-moderate PTG, with an emphasis on appreciating life and becoming more independent and mature. While sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were not associated with PTG, psychosocial factors such as personal resources, including social support and coping strategies, were associated with PTG outcomes. Conclusion: In the past decade, few studies have assessed PTG among families of CCS despite the call to focus on families in a previous review. We found that social support and proactive coping strategies may be the most helpful in promoting PTG.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OR9.0000000000000087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OR9.0000000000000087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:儿童癌症不仅影响患者,而且影响整个家庭。我们系统地回顾了儿童癌症幸存者(CCS)家庭成员创伤后生长(PTG)的最新证据。方法:我们更新了一项关于CCS家庭成员PTG的系统综述(包括2010年3月至2021年12月的新证据)。我们筛选了4个数据库(PubMed、PsycINFO、CINAHL和SCOPUS)。提取关键研究信息和结果进行质量评价。我们叙述性地综合了CCS家庭中照料者(目标1)和兄弟姐妹(目标2)中PTG水平和领域的报告证据,以及相关的社会人口统计学和心理社会特征(目标3)。结果:646篇文献中,16篇符合入选标准。11项研究采用定量方法(均为横断面),3项采用定性方法,2项采用混合方法。参与者包括父母和其他主要照顾者(11项研究)、祖父母(1项研究)和兄弟姐妹(5项研究)。大多数照顾者报告高水平的PTG,最常涉及个人成长和更强/更紧密的家庭关系。兄弟姐妹报告的PTG处于低至中等水平,强调欣赏生活,变得更加独立和成熟。虽然社会人口学和临床特征与PTG无关,但心理社会因素,如个人资源,包括社会支持和应对策略,与PTG结果相关。结论:在过去的十年中,很少有研究评估CCS家庭中的PTG,尽管在之前的综述中呼吁关注家庭。我们发现社会支持和积极应对策略可能对促进PTG最有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-traumatic growth in family members of childhood cancer survivors—an updated systematic review
Abstract Background: Childhood cancer affects not only the patients, but their entire family. We systematically reviewed recent evidence of post-traumatic growth (PTG) among family members of childhood cancer survivors (CCS). Methods: We updated a systematic review of PTG among family members of CCS (including new evidence from March 2010 to December 2021). We screened 4 databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and SCOPUS). Key study information and results were extracted for the quality appraisal. We narratively synthesized the evidence for reported levels and domains of PTG in caregivers (aim 1) and siblings (aim 2) and associated sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics (aim 3) in families of CCS. Results: Of the 646 identified articles, 16 met eligibility criteria. Eleven studies used quantitative (all cross-sectional), 3 qualitative, and 2 mixed methods. Participants included parents and other primary caregivers (11 studies), grandparents (1 study), and siblings (5 studies). Most caregivers reported high levels of PTG, most often involving personal growth and stronger/closer family relationships. Siblings reported low-to-moderate PTG, with an emphasis on appreciating life and becoming more independent and mature. While sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were not associated with PTG, psychosocial factors such as personal resources, including social support and coping strategies, were associated with PTG outcomes. Conclusion: In the past decade, few studies have assessed PTG among families of CCS despite the call to focus on families in a previous review. We found that social support and proactive coping strategies may be the most helpful in promoting PTG.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信