{"title":"保罗·里科与哲学人类学问题。与海德格尔关于康德在《易犯错误的人》中占有的辩论","authors":"Tomás Domergue","doi":"10.46553/TAB.15.2019.P79-94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to demonstrate that, under the transcendental stage of the anthropology of ‘The fallible man’, Ricoeur develops a discussion with the philosophies of finitude, to achieve an original interpretation of Kant, crystallized, in turn, in a debate with Heidegger. To demonstrate this, we will dedicate ourselves, first of all, to develop the main concepts of the transcendental stage of reflection such as the Ricoeur proponents. Then, we will try to see how and to what extent they confront the Heideggerian proposal. With this, we intend to highlight the methodical and thematic differences present in the phenomenological-hermeneutical projects of both philosophers.","PeriodicalId":33854,"journal":{"name":"Tabano","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paul Ricoeur y el problema de la antropología filosófica. El debate con Heidegger por la apropiación de Kant en «El hombre falible»\",\"authors\":\"Tomás Domergue\",\"doi\":\"10.46553/TAB.15.2019.P79-94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to demonstrate that, under the transcendental stage of the anthropology of ‘The fallible man’, Ricoeur develops a discussion with the philosophies of finitude, to achieve an original interpretation of Kant, crystallized, in turn, in a debate with Heidegger. To demonstrate this, we will dedicate ourselves, first of all, to develop the main concepts of the transcendental stage of reflection such as the Ricoeur proponents. Then, we will try to see how and to what extent they confront the Heideggerian proposal. With this, we intend to highlight the methodical and thematic differences present in the phenomenological-hermeneutical projects of both philosophers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tabano\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tabano\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46553/TAB.15.2019.P79-94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tabano","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/TAB.15.2019.P79-94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Paul Ricoeur y el problema de la antropología filosófica. El debate con Heidegger por la apropiación de Kant en «El hombre falible»
This article aims to demonstrate that, under the transcendental stage of the anthropology of ‘The fallible man’, Ricoeur develops a discussion with the philosophies of finitude, to achieve an original interpretation of Kant, crystallized, in turn, in a debate with Heidegger. To demonstrate this, we will dedicate ourselves, first of all, to develop the main concepts of the transcendental stage of reflection such as the Ricoeur proponents. Then, we will try to see how and to what extent they confront the Heideggerian proposal. With this, we intend to highlight the methodical and thematic differences present in the phenomenological-hermeneutical projects of both philosophers.