论坛:案例C-368/21:增值税法意义上的进口新定义?

IF 0.9 Q2 LAW
EC Tax Review Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.54648/ecta2022027
Sven Ojak
{"title":"论坛:案例C-368/21:增值税法意义上的进口新定义?","authors":"Sven Ojak","doi":"10.54648/ecta2022027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the Eurogate II and DHL decision (CJEU, Judgment of 2 June 2016, EU:C:2016:405), it has been clear that importation in the VAT context means ‘the entry of goods into the economic network’ of the Union. However, it is problematic that neither the EU VAT Directive nor the CJEU provide a distinct definition of what is meant by this term. This article deals with the main existing theories on the interpretation of this indeterminate legal concept in the German-language literature and by the German fiscal courts. It is concluded that these theories unfortunately ignore the exposed consumption tax character of (import) VAT and therefore deliver inconsistent results in contradiction to the recent decisions of the CJEU.\nimportation, import VAT, customs, economic network, economic cycle, consumption tax, EU VAT Directive","PeriodicalId":43686,"journal":{"name":"EC Tax Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forum: Case C-368/21: A New Definition of Importation in the Sense of VAT Law?\",\"authors\":\"Sven Ojak\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/ecta2022027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the Eurogate II and DHL decision (CJEU, Judgment of 2 June 2016, EU:C:2016:405), it has been clear that importation in the VAT context means ‘the entry of goods into the economic network’ of the Union. However, it is problematic that neither the EU VAT Directive nor the CJEU provide a distinct definition of what is meant by this term. This article deals with the main existing theories on the interpretation of this indeterminate legal concept in the German-language literature and by the German fiscal courts. It is concluded that these theories unfortunately ignore the exposed consumption tax character of (import) VAT and therefore deliver inconsistent results in contradiction to the recent decisions of the CJEU.\\nimportation, import VAT, customs, economic network, economic cycle, consumption tax, EU VAT Directive\",\"PeriodicalId\":43686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EC Tax Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EC Tax Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2022027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EC Tax Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2022027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自Eurogate II和DHL决定(欧盟法院,2016年6月2日判决,欧盟:C:2016:405)以来,很明显,增值税背景下的进口意味着“货物进入欧盟经济网络”。然而,有问题的是,欧盟增值税指令和CJEU都没有对这个术语的含义提供明确的定义。本文论述了德语文献和德国财政法院对这一不确定法律概念的解释的主要现有理论。得出的结论是,不幸的是,这些理论忽视了(进口)增值税暴露的消费税特征,因此产生了不一致的结果,与欧盟委员会最近的决定相矛盾。进口、进口增值税、海关、经济网络、经济周期、消费税、欧盟增值税指令
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forum: Case C-368/21: A New Definition of Importation in the Sense of VAT Law?
Since the Eurogate II and DHL decision (CJEU, Judgment of 2 June 2016, EU:C:2016:405), it has been clear that importation in the VAT context means ‘the entry of goods into the economic network’ of the Union. However, it is problematic that neither the EU VAT Directive nor the CJEU provide a distinct definition of what is meant by this term. This article deals with the main existing theories on the interpretation of this indeterminate legal concept in the German-language literature and by the German fiscal courts. It is concluded that these theories unfortunately ignore the exposed consumption tax character of (import) VAT and therefore deliver inconsistent results in contradiction to the recent decisions of the CJEU. importation, import VAT, customs, economic network, economic cycle, consumption tax, EU VAT Directive
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信