插补方式对舵-螺旋桨相互作用反演法精度的影响

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
S. Lemaire, G. Vaz, Menno Deij ‐ van Rijswijk, S. Turnock
{"title":"插补方式对舵-螺旋桨相互作用反演法精度的影响","authors":"S. Lemaire, G. Vaz, Menno Deij ‐ van Rijswijk, S. Turnock","doi":"10.1115/1.4056681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The overset method and associated interpolation schemes are usually thoroughly verified only on synthetic or academic test cases for which conclusions might not directly translate to real engineering problems. In the present work, an overset grid method is used to simulate a rudder-propeller flow, for which a comprehensive verification and validation study is performed. Three overset interpolation schemes (from first to third order) are tested to quantify and qualify numerical errors on integral quantities, mass imbalance, flow features and rudder pressure distributions. The performance overhead is also measured to help make accuracy-performance balance decisions. Rigorous solution verification is performed to estimate time and space discretisation, iterative and statistical uncertainties. Validation of the rudder flow against experimental data is also done.\n The results show that, while the choice of interpolation scheme has minimal impact on time-averaged integral quantities (like forces), they do influence the smoothness of the time signals, with the first order scheme resulting in large intensity high-frequency temporal oscillations. Lower order interpolation methods also produce more interpolation artefacts in fringe cells, which are then convected downstream. Mass imbalance is also affected by the interpolation scheme, with higher order schemes (third order) resulting in an order of magnitude lower flux errors. The limitations of first order schemes do not, however, result in significant lower computational overhead, with the second order being even cheaper than the first order one in the tested implementation. Lastly, validation shows promising results with rudder forces within 10% of the experiments.","PeriodicalId":52254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Interpolation Scheme On the Accuracy of Overset Method for Computing Rudder-propeller Interaction\",\"authors\":\"S. Lemaire, G. Vaz, Menno Deij ‐ van Rijswijk, S. Turnock\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4056681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The overset method and associated interpolation schemes are usually thoroughly verified only on synthetic or academic test cases for which conclusions might not directly translate to real engineering problems. In the present work, an overset grid method is used to simulate a rudder-propeller flow, for which a comprehensive verification and validation study is performed. Three overset interpolation schemes (from first to third order) are tested to quantify and qualify numerical errors on integral quantities, mass imbalance, flow features and rudder pressure distributions. The performance overhead is also measured to help make accuracy-performance balance decisions. Rigorous solution verification is performed to estimate time and space discretisation, iterative and statistical uncertainties. Validation of the rudder flow against experimental data is also done.\\n The results show that, while the choice of interpolation scheme has minimal impact on time-averaged integral quantities (like forces), they do influence the smoothness of the time signals, with the first order scheme resulting in large intensity high-frequency temporal oscillations. Lower order interpolation methods also produce more interpolation artefacts in fringe cells, which are then convected downstream. Mass imbalance is also affected by the interpolation scheme, with higher order schemes (third order) resulting in an order of magnitude lower flux errors. The limitations of first order schemes do not, however, result in significant lower computational overhead, with the second order being even cheaper than the first order one in the tested implementation. Lastly, validation shows promising results with rudder forces within 10% of the experiments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

overset方法和相关的插值方案通常只在合成的或学术的测试用例上得到彻底的验证,这些测试用例的结论可能不会直接转化为实际的工程问题。本文采用超调网格法模拟舵-螺旋桨流动,并对其进行了全面的验证研究。从一阶到三阶对三种补偿插值方案进行了测试,以量化和限定积分量、质量不平衡、流量特征和舵压力分布等方面的数值误差。还测量了性能开销,以帮助做出准确性和性能之间的平衡决策。通过严格的解验证来估计时间和空间离散、迭代和统计不确定性。最后,用实验数据对舵流进行了验证。结果表明,虽然插值方案的选择对时间平均积分量(如力)的影响最小,但它们确实影响时间信号的平滑性,其中一阶方案导致大强度高频时间振荡。低阶插值方法还在边缘细胞中产生更多的插值伪影,然后向下游对流。质量不平衡也受到插值格式的影响,高阶格式(三阶)导致通量误差降低一个数量级。然而,一阶方案的限制并没有显著降低计算开销,在测试的实现中,二阶方案甚至比一阶方案更便宜。最后,将方向舵力控制在实验的10%以内,验证结果令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of Interpolation Scheme On the Accuracy of Overset Method for Computing Rudder-propeller Interaction
The overset method and associated interpolation schemes are usually thoroughly verified only on synthetic or academic test cases for which conclusions might not directly translate to real engineering problems. In the present work, an overset grid method is used to simulate a rudder-propeller flow, for which a comprehensive verification and validation study is performed. Three overset interpolation schemes (from first to third order) are tested to quantify and qualify numerical errors on integral quantities, mass imbalance, flow features and rudder pressure distributions. The performance overhead is also measured to help make accuracy-performance balance decisions. Rigorous solution verification is performed to estimate time and space discretisation, iterative and statistical uncertainties. Validation of the rudder flow against experimental data is also done. The results show that, while the choice of interpolation scheme has minimal impact on time-averaged integral quantities (like forces), they do influence the smoothness of the time signals, with the first order scheme resulting in large intensity high-frequency temporal oscillations. Lower order interpolation methods also produce more interpolation artefacts in fringe cells, which are then convected downstream. Mass imbalance is also affected by the interpolation scheme, with higher order schemes (third order) resulting in an order of magnitude lower flux errors. The limitations of first order schemes do not, however, result in significant lower computational overhead, with the second order being even cheaper than the first order one in the tested implementation. Lastly, validation shows promising results with rudder forces within 10% of the experiments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信