歌唱和伴奏支持歌词的加工,改变歌词的意义

IF 0.6 0 MUSIC
Y. Schotanus
{"title":"歌唱和伴奏支持歌词的加工,改变歌词的意义","authors":"Y. Schotanus","doi":"10.18061/emr.v15i1-2.6863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A growing body of evidence indicates that music can support the processing of language. Some of its beneficial effects may even occur after one exposure. Accompaniment can also have an impact: in a-cappella singing, silences and out-of-key notes may confuse listeners, while accompaniment avoids silences and elucidates both rhythm and harmony, thereby supporting music-processing and concentration. These hypotheses were tested in two experiments. In a classroom setting, 271 pupils (M = 15.7 years old, SD = 0.9), listened to five out of 24 tracks (four songs in six different conditions) and completed a questionnaire after each one. As expected, the instrumental interludes between sung or spoken phrases in accompanied versions were rated less distracting than the silences that replace them in unaccompanied ones. Furthermore, perceived arousal, emotion, valence, and purity of singing were rated more positively in accompanied versions. Singing, on the other hand, supports the perceived intelligibility and comprehensibility of the lyrics. Finally, the music makes repetitions of words and phrases more meaningful and changes the lyrics’ emotional meaning, wereby some aspects of sadness are associated with negative affect while other aspects of sadness are associated with positive affect. These results were by and large replicated in a better randomized laboratory experiment among 24 adults (M = 24.4; SD = 4.8). Submitted 2018 November 26; accepted 2020 August 6. Published 2020 October 22; https://doi.org/10.18061/emr.v15i1-2.6863","PeriodicalId":44128,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Musicology Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Singing and Accompaniment Support the Processing of Song Lyrics and Change the Lyrics' Meaning\",\"authors\":\"Y. Schotanus\",\"doi\":\"10.18061/emr.v15i1-2.6863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A growing body of evidence indicates that music can support the processing of language. Some of its beneficial effects may even occur after one exposure. Accompaniment can also have an impact: in a-cappella singing, silences and out-of-key notes may confuse listeners, while accompaniment avoids silences and elucidates both rhythm and harmony, thereby supporting music-processing and concentration. These hypotheses were tested in two experiments. In a classroom setting, 271 pupils (M = 15.7 years old, SD = 0.9), listened to five out of 24 tracks (four songs in six different conditions) and completed a questionnaire after each one. As expected, the instrumental interludes between sung or spoken phrases in accompanied versions were rated less distracting than the silences that replace them in unaccompanied ones. Furthermore, perceived arousal, emotion, valence, and purity of singing were rated more positively in accompanied versions. Singing, on the other hand, supports the perceived intelligibility and comprehensibility of the lyrics. Finally, the music makes repetitions of words and phrases more meaningful and changes the lyrics’ emotional meaning, wereby some aspects of sadness are associated with negative affect while other aspects of sadness are associated with positive affect. These results were by and large replicated in a better randomized laboratory experiment among 24 adults (M = 24.4; SD = 4.8). Submitted 2018 November 26; accepted 2020 August 6. Published 2020 October 22; https://doi.org/10.18061/emr.v15i1-2.6863\",\"PeriodicalId\":44128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Empirical Musicology Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Empirical Musicology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18061/emr.v15i1-2.6863\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Musicology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18061/emr.v15i1-2.6863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,音乐可以支持语言的处理。它的一些有益效果甚至可能在一次接触后发生。伴奏也会产生影响:在无伴奏合唱中,沉默和走调可能会让听众感到困惑,而伴奏则避免沉默,阐明节奏和和声,从而支持音乐处理和集中。这些假设在两个实验中得到了检验。在课堂环境中,271名学生(M=15.7岁,SD=0.9)听了24首曲目中的5首(在六种不同的条件下听了四首歌),并在每首曲目之后完成了问卷调查。正如预期的那样,伴奏版本中演唱或口语短语之间的器乐穿插被认为比无伴奏版本中取代它们的沉默更不分散注意力。此外,在伴奏版本中,对歌唱的唤醒、情感、效价和纯洁性的评价更为积极。另一方面,唱歌支持歌词的可理解性和可理解性。最后,音乐使单词和短语的重复更有意义,并改变了歌词的情感含义,因为悲伤的某些方面与负面情绪有关,而悲伤的其他方面与正面情绪有关。这些结果大体上在一项更好的随机实验室实验中在24名成年人中得到了复制(M=24.4;SD=4.8)。2018年11月26日提交;接受2020年8月6日。出版于2020年10月22日;https://doi.org/10.18061/emr.v15i1-2.6863
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Singing and Accompaniment Support the Processing of Song Lyrics and Change the Lyrics' Meaning
A growing body of evidence indicates that music can support the processing of language. Some of its beneficial effects may even occur after one exposure. Accompaniment can also have an impact: in a-cappella singing, silences and out-of-key notes may confuse listeners, while accompaniment avoids silences and elucidates both rhythm and harmony, thereby supporting music-processing and concentration. These hypotheses were tested in two experiments. In a classroom setting, 271 pupils (M = 15.7 years old, SD = 0.9), listened to five out of 24 tracks (four songs in six different conditions) and completed a questionnaire after each one. As expected, the instrumental interludes between sung or spoken phrases in accompanied versions were rated less distracting than the silences that replace them in unaccompanied ones. Furthermore, perceived arousal, emotion, valence, and purity of singing were rated more positively in accompanied versions. Singing, on the other hand, supports the perceived intelligibility and comprehensibility of the lyrics. Finally, the music makes repetitions of words and phrases more meaningful and changes the lyrics’ emotional meaning, wereby some aspects of sadness are associated with negative affect while other aspects of sadness are associated with positive affect. These results were by and large replicated in a better randomized laboratory experiment among 24 adults (M = 24.4; SD = 4.8). Submitted 2018 November 26; accepted 2020 August 6. Published 2020 October 22; https://doi.org/10.18061/emr.v15i1-2.6863
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信