F. Fontana, B. van der Hoek, Jessica Stromberg, C. Tiddy, N. Francis, S. Tassios, Y. Uvarova
{"title":"关于使用LIBS数据进行矿物学调查——聚类方法的限制和应用","authors":"F. Fontana, B. van der Hoek, Jessica Stromberg, C. Tiddy, N. Francis, S. Tassios, Y. Uvarova","doi":"10.1144/geochem2023-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines how LIBS data collected using a downhole deployable LIBS prototype for geochemical analysis in a fashion that imitates downhole deployment may be used for mineralogical investigations. Two chemically and mineralogically practically identical felsic rocks, namely granite and microgranite are used to assess the effects of rock texture on mineral classification and high-resolution SEM-TIMA mineral maps are used to reveal mineralogical composition of each LIBS ablation crater. Additionally, in order to extend the LIBS application for fast mineralogical studies to a greenfield scenario (i.e., no previous knowledge) a clustering methodology is presented for mineralogical classification from LIBS data. Results indicate that most LIBS spot analyses sample mineral mixtures, 91.2% and 100% for granite and microgranite, respectively, which challenges mineralogical classification, particularly for fine-grained rocks. Positive identification and classification of minerals of slightly different compositions relative to the bulk rock (i.e., fluorite and biotite in granitic rocks) demonstrates how minerals or minerals groups of distinct and interesting chemical compositions (e.g., sulphides or oxides in silicate dominated rocks) can be rapidly recognised in a mineral exploration scenario. Strategies for overcoming mineral mixture issues are presented and recommendations are given for effective workflows for mineralogical analysis using LIBS data in different mineral exploration stages.\n \n Supplementary material:\n https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6444482\n","PeriodicalId":55114,"journal":{"name":"Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the use of LIBS data for mineralogical investigations – constraints and application of a clustering method\",\"authors\":\"F. Fontana, B. van der Hoek, Jessica Stromberg, C. Tiddy, N. Francis, S. Tassios, Y. Uvarova\",\"doi\":\"10.1144/geochem2023-003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines how LIBS data collected using a downhole deployable LIBS prototype for geochemical analysis in a fashion that imitates downhole deployment may be used for mineralogical investigations. Two chemically and mineralogically practically identical felsic rocks, namely granite and microgranite are used to assess the effects of rock texture on mineral classification and high-resolution SEM-TIMA mineral maps are used to reveal mineralogical composition of each LIBS ablation crater. Additionally, in order to extend the LIBS application for fast mineralogical studies to a greenfield scenario (i.e., no previous knowledge) a clustering methodology is presented for mineralogical classification from LIBS data. Results indicate that most LIBS spot analyses sample mineral mixtures, 91.2% and 100% for granite and microgranite, respectively, which challenges mineralogical classification, particularly for fine-grained rocks. Positive identification and classification of minerals of slightly different compositions relative to the bulk rock (i.e., fluorite and biotite in granitic rocks) demonstrates how minerals or minerals groups of distinct and interesting chemical compositions (e.g., sulphides or oxides in silicate dominated rocks) can be rapidly recognised in a mineral exploration scenario. Strategies for overcoming mineral mixture issues are presented and recommendations are given for effective workflows for mineralogical analysis using LIBS data in different mineral exploration stages.\\n \\n Supplementary material:\\n https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6444482\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":55114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1144/geochem2023-003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/geochem2023-003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the use of LIBS data for mineralogical investigations – constraints and application of a clustering method
This study examines how LIBS data collected using a downhole deployable LIBS prototype for geochemical analysis in a fashion that imitates downhole deployment may be used for mineralogical investigations. Two chemically and mineralogically practically identical felsic rocks, namely granite and microgranite are used to assess the effects of rock texture on mineral classification and high-resolution SEM-TIMA mineral maps are used to reveal mineralogical composition of each LIBS ablation crater. Additionally, in order to extend the LIBS application for fast mineralogical studies to a greenfield scenario (i.e., no previous knowledge) a clustering methodology is presented for mineralogical classification from LIBS data. Results indicate that most LIBS spot analyses sample mineral mixtures, 91.2% and 100% for granite and microgranite, respectively, which challenges mineralogical classification, particularly for fine-grained rocks. Positive identification and classification of minerals of slightly different compositions relative to the bulk rock (i.e., fluorite and biotite in granitic rocks) demonstrates how minerals or minerals groups of distinct and interesting chemical compositions (e.g., sulphides or oxides in silicate dominated rocks) can be rapidly recognised in a mineral exploration scenario. Strategies for overcoming mineral mixture issues are presented and recommendations are given for effective workflows for mineralogical analysis using LIBS data in different mineral exploration stages.
Supplementary material:
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6444482
期刊介绍:
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis (GEEA) is a co-owned journal of the Geological Society of London and the Association of Applied Geochemists (AAG).
GEEA focuses on mineral exploration using geochemistry; related fields also covered include geoanalysis, the development of methods and techniques used to analyse geochemical materials such as rocks, soils, sediments, waters and vegetation, and environmental issues associated with mining and source apportionment.
GEEA is well-known for its thematic sets on hot topics and regularly publishes papers from the biennial International Applied Geochemistry Symposium (IAGS).
Papers that seek to integrate geological, geochemical and geophysical methods of exploration are particularly welcome, as are those that concern geochemical mapping and those that comprise case histories. Given the many links between exploration and environmental geochemistry, the journal encourages the exchange of concepts and data; in particular, to differentiate various sources of elements.
GEEA publishes research articles; discussion papers; book reviews; editorial content and thematic sets.