食品供应链中物流的特征化、评估和改进方法

IF 0.8 Q4 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
P. Rodríguez, Andrés Cañón, J. Orjuela-Castro
{"title":"食品供应链中物流的特征化、评估和改进方法","authors":"P. Rodríguez, Andrés Cañón, J. Orjuela-Castro","doi":"10.22306/al.v10i2.369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The food supply chain (FSC) is made up of producers, traders and processors who bring the product from supply to demand through logistical processes. Food supply chains require specific methodologies for their current diagnosis, evaluation and improvement. Logistics in food supply chain requires to be managed according to its nature. This article identifies the different methodologies through a systematic literature review of publications from 2005 to 2022, using Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar search engines, in order to establish the state of the art. As a result of this review, a new taxonomy is proposed and includes the following methodological groups: management, qualitative, quantitative, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), statistics, machine learning, mathematical modelling, discrete simulation, system dynamics and others. The methodologies of characterization, evaluation and improvement are classified into two main groups of logistical means and modes. The performance measures most commonly used in the methodologies by the researchers were also identified. From the article, discussions, challenges and trends are generated to identify possible future research and different gaps.","PeriodicalId":36880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Logistica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodologies for characterization, evaluation, and improvement of logistics in the food supply chain\",\"authors\":\"P. Rodríguez, Andrés Cañón, J. Orjuela-Castro\",\"doi\":\"10.22306/al.v10i2.369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The food supply chain (FSC) is made up of producers, traders and processors who bring the product from supply to demand through logistical processes. Food supply chains require specific methodologies for their current diagnosis, evaluation and improvement. Logistics in food supply chain requires to be managed according to its nature. This article identifies the different methodologies through a systematic literature review of publications from 2005 to 2022, using Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar search engines, in order to establish the state of the art. As a result of this review, a new taxonomy is proposed and includes the following methodological groups: management, qualitative, quantitative, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), statistics, machine learning, mathematical modelling, discrete simulation, system dynamics and others. The methodologies of characterization, evaluation and improvement are classified into two main groups of logistical means and modes. The performance measures most commonly used in the methodologies by the researchers were also identified. From the article, discussions, challenges and trends are generated to identify possible future research and different gaps.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Logistica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Logistica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22306/al.v10i2.369\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Logistica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22306/al.v10i2.369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

食品供应链(FSC)由生产者、贸易商和加工者组成,他们通过物流过程将产品从供应端运送到需求端。食品供应链需要特定的方法来进行当前的诊断、评估和改进。食品供应链中的物流需要根据其性质进行管理。本文通过使用Web of Science、Scopus和b谷歌Scholar搜索引擎对2005年至2022年的出版物进行系统的文献综述,确定了不同的方法,以建立最新的技术水平。作为这一综述的结果,提出了一个新的分类法,包括以下方法组:管理,定性,定量,多标准决策(MCDM),统计学,机器学习,数学建模,离散模拟,系统动力学等。表征、评价和改进的方法主要分为物流手段和物流模式两大类。研究人员还确定了方法中最常用的性能度量。从文章中,讨论,挑战和趋势产生,以确定可能的未来研究和不同的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methodologies for characterization, evaluation, and improvement of logistics in the food supply chain
The food supply chain (FSC) is made up of producers, traders and processors who bring the product from supply to demand through logistical processes. Food supply chains require specific methodologies for their current diagnosis, evaluation and improvement. Logistics in food supply chain requires to be managed according to its nature. This article identifies the different methodologies through a systematic literature review of publications from 2005 to 2022, using Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar search engines, in order to establish the state of the art. As a result of this review, a new taxonomy is proposed and includes the following methodological groups: management, qualitative, quantitative, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), statistics, machine learning, mathematical modelling, discrete simulation, system dynamics and others. The methodologies of characterization, evaluation and improvement are classified into two main groups of logistical means and modes. The performance measures most commonly used in the methodologies by the researchers were also identified. From the article, discussions, challenges and trends are generated to identify possible future research and different gaps.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Logistica
Acta Logistica Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
36
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信