{"title":"意大利生态电影《超越人类》","authors":"Derek Alexander Ginoris","doi":"10.1080/01614622.2022.2111073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"notes, “saw their own enlarged silhouettes projected, as in a shadow theater, on four large screens at ground level” (219) as they wandered around large columns wrapped in black fabric which the designer Sartogo called, with some apparent irony, “fasci.” It's impossible to forget that the Mostra della Rivoluzione Fascista was held in the same halls, inaugurated by Mussolini in 1932. Golan frames her subjects in a way that recalls—at points—the odd use of the second person singular found in some narrations: you weren’t there, but you are invoked, as indirect subjectivity. You are and you are not a character in a brief or ephemeral mini-drama. Groups of men converse, with wives and other women standing on the margins. Golan’s book does, I think, offer the reader the possibility to imagine a feminist counterhistory to what was, by all appearances, a rather masculine milieu. The fact is that while many of the works she engages with still exist today including within major museum collections, they are equally characterized by a momentariness that is not precisely “located” in the photographs Golan reproduces, but better “dislocated.” She devotes a great deal of time to a phenomenology of Pistoletto’s mirror works. The photographs of certain “characters” (art world personages, but also random visitors) in and around the works suggest possible plots and imaginary relations. Reading Flashback, Eclipse, I was reminded, strangely, of Vanni Santoni’s Personaggi precari (RGB Media, 2007, licensed by Creative Commons), which begins with a preface inviting readers to use its “precarious characters” in their own “plays, stories, short and long films, role playing games, animation, novels, cartoons, radio and film transmissions.” They are “available for major roles or as extras, with shortor long-term contracts” and can be employed “in completely arbitrary ways, even undergoing humiliation or death if they story requires it.” (Santoni 1). Naturally, though, you might also choose to read that book as a novel, from front to back, experiencing the tenuousness of the characters and the full stops that separate one from the next, as an existential condition. Of course, Golan paints a portrait of a world when the roots of “the precariat” are being sown. Her actors may not appear cynical or anxious about labor, the social safety net, or massive planetary disruption. They move about the spaces of an Italy emerging from the war and the subsequent economic boom looking simultaneously outward and inward. The book is punctuated with moments of unadulterated joy, but also melancholy as we measure our distance or proximity to the energy and experimentation of the 60s. It is rare to read such a generous aperture—one that grants the reader freedom to navigate her relation to a past that is moving ever further away. In this regard one might be tempted to call Golan’s style feminist. At any rate it embraces art and politics in all of their messy imbrication.","PeriodicalId":41506,"journal":{"name":"Italian Culture","volume":"40 1","pages":"198 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Italian Ecocinema Beyond the Human\",\"authors\":\"Derek Alexander Ginoris\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01614622.2022.2111073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"notes, “saw their own enlarged silhouettes projected, as in a shadow theater, on four large screens at ground level” (219) as they wandered around large columns wrapped in black fabric which the designer Sartogo called, with some apparent irony, “fasci.” It's impossible to forget that the Mostra della Rivoluzione Fascista was held in the same halls, inaugurated by Mussolini in 1932. Golan frames her subjects in a way that recalls—at points—the odd use of the second person singular found in some narrations: you weren’t there, but you are invoked, as indirect subjectivity. You are and you are not a character in a brief or ephemeral mini-drama. Groups of men converse, with wives and other women standing on the margins. Golan’s book does, I think, offer the reader the possibility to imagine a feminist counterhistory to what was, by all appearances, a rather masculine milieu. The fact is that while many of the works she engages with still exist today including within major museum collections, they are equally characterized by a momentariness that is not precisely “located” in the photographs Golan reproduces, but better “dislocated.” She devotes a great deal of time to a phenomenology of Pistoletto’s mirror works. The photographs of certain “characters” (art world personages, but also random visitors) in and around the works suggest possible plots and imaginary relations. Reading Flashback, Eclipse, I was reminded, strangely, of Vanni Santoni’s Personaggi precari (RGB Media, 2007, licensed by Creative Commons), which begins with a preface inviting readers to use its “precarious characters” in their own “plays, stories, short and long films, role playing games, animation, novels, cartoons, radio and film transmissions.” They are “available for major roles or as extras, with shortor long-term contracts” and can be employed “in completely arbitrary ways, even undergoing humiliation or death if they story requires it.” (Santoni 1). Naturally, though, you might also choose to read that book as a novel, from front to back, experiencing the tenuousness of the characters and the full stops that separate one from the next, as an existential condition. Of course, Golan paints a portrait of a world when the roots of “the precariat” are being sown. Her actors may not appear cynical or anxious about labor, the social safety net, or massive planetary disruption. They move about the spaces of an Italy emerging from the war and the subsequent economic boom looking simultaneously outward and inward. The book is punctuated with moments of unadulterated joy, but also melancholy as we measure our distance or proximity to the energy and experimentation of the 60s. It is rare to read such a generous aperture—one that grants the reader freedom to navigate her relation to a past that is moving ever further away. In this regard one might be tempted to call Golan’s style feminist. At any rate it embraces art and politics in all of their messy imbrication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italian Culture\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"198 - 200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italian Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01614622.2022.2111073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01614622.2022.2111073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
“看到他们自己放大的轮廓投射在地面的四个大屏幕上,就像在皮影戏里一样”(219页),他们在用黑色织物包裹的大柱子上徘徊,设计师萨多戈(Sartogo)带着明显的讽刺称之为“时尚”(fasci)。人们不可能忘记,1932年墨索里尼(Mussolini)举行的法西斯革命博物馆(Mostra della Rivoluzione Fascista)也是在同一大厅举行的。戈兰以一种让人想起——有时——在某些叙述中发现的奇怪的第二人称单数用法:你不在那里,但你被召唤,作为间接的主体性。你是,也不是一个短暂或短暂的迷你剧中的角色。一群群男人交谈,妻子和其他女人站在边上。我认为,戈兰的书确实为读者提供了一种想象女权主义反历史的可能性,而从表面上看,这是一个相当男性化的环境。事实是,虽然她参与的许多作品今天仍然存在,包括在主要博物馆收藏中,但它们同样具有瞬间性,这种瞬间性并不是精确地“定位”在戈兰复制的照片中,而是更好地“错位”。她花了大量时间研究皮斯特莱托镜子作品的现象学。作品中的某些“人物”(艺术界人士,但也有随机的参观者)的照片暗示了可能的情节和想象的关系。读《闪回,月食》时,我奇怪地想起了Vanni Santoni的《Personaggi precari》(RGB Media, 2007, Creative Commons授权),这本书以序言开头,邀请读者在自己的“戏剧、故事、短片和长片、角色扮演游戏、动画、小说、漫画、广播和电影传输”中使用它的“不稳定角色”。他们“可以出演主要角色,也可以作为临时演员,签订短期的长期合同”,并且可以“以完全任意的方式使用,如果故事需要,甚至可以忍受羞辱或死亡”。当然,你也可以选择把这本书当作小说来读,从头到尾,体验人物的脆弱,以及将一个人与下一个人分开的句号,作为一种存在的条件。当然,戈兰描绘了一个“无产者”正在生根发芽的世界。她的演员们可能不会对劳工、社会安全网或大规模的地球破坏表现出愤世嫉俗或焦虑。他们游走于意大利的空间,从战争和随后的经济繁荣中走出来,同时向外和向内看。这本书中穿插着纯粹的欢乐时刻,但当我们衡量我们与60年代的能量和实验的距离或接近时,也会感到忧郁。很少能读到如此慷慨的篇章——它让读者可以自由地驾驭她与过去的关系,而过去的关系正变得越来越远。在这方面,人们可能会把戈兰的风格称为女权主义。无论如何,它把艺术和政治混杂在一起。
notes, “saw their own enlarged silhouettes projected, as in a shadow theater, on four large screens at ground level” (219) as they wandered around large columns wrapped in black fabric which the designer Sartogo called, with some apparent irony, “fasci.” It's impossible to forget that the Mostra della Rivoluzione Fascista was held in the same halls, inaugurated by Mussolini in 1932. Golan frames her subjects in a way that recalls—at points—the odd use of the second person singular found in some narrations: you weren’t there, but you are invoked, as indirect subjectivity. You are and you are not a character in a brief or ephemeral mini-drama. Groups of men converse, with wives and other women standing on the margins. Golan’s book does, I think, offer the reader the possibility to imagine a feminist counterhistory to what was, by all appearances, a rather masculine milieu. The fact is that while many of the works she engages with still exist today including within major museum collections, they are equally characterized by a momentariness that is not precisely “located” in the photographs Golan reproduces, but better “dislocated.” She devotes a great deal of time to a phenomenology of Pistoletto’s mirror works. The photographs of certain “characters” (art world personages, but also random visitors) in and around the works suggest possible plots and imaginary relations. Reading Flashback, Eclipse, I was reminded, strangely, of Vanni Santoni’s Personaggi precari (RGB Media, 2007, licensed by Creative Commons), which begins with a preface inviting readers to use its “precarious characters” in their own “plays, stories, short and long films, role playing games, animation, novels, cartoons, radio and film transmissions.” They are “available for major roles or as extras, with shortor long-term contracts” and can be employed “in completely arbitrary ways, even undergoing humiliation or death if they story requires it.” (Santoni 1). Naturally, though, you might also choose to read that book as a novel, from front to back, experiencing the tenuousness of the characters and the full stops that separate one from the next, as an existential condition. Of course, Golan paints a portrait of a world when the roots of “the precariat” are being sown. Her actors may not appear cynical or anxious about labor, the social safety net, or massive planetary disruption. They move about the spaces of an Italy emerging from the war and the subsequent economic boom looking simultaneously outward and inward. The book is punctuated with moments of unadulterated joy, but also melancholy as we measure our distance or proximity to the energy and experimentation of the 60s. It is rare to read such a generous aperture—one that grants the reader freedom to navigate her relation to a past that is moving ever further away. In this regard one might be tempted to call Golan’s style feminist. At any rate it embraces art and politics in all of their messy imbrication.