欺骗性市场中的动态竞争

IF 2.8 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
J. Johnen
{"title":"欺骗性市场中的动态竞争","authors":"J. Johnen","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many deceptive markets, firms design contracts to exploit mistakes of naive consumers. These contracts also attract less profitable sophisticated consumers. I study such markets when firms compete repeatedly and gather usage data about their customers which is informative about the likelihood of a customer being sophisticated. I find that in sharp contrast to a model with only rational consumers, this customer information is of great value to its owner despite perfect competition. Formally, I introduce a two-period model in which all consumers are aware of a transparent price component. Naives additionally pay a hidden fee, e.g. for an add-on service, that they do not take into account. Competing firms cannot discriminate between new consumers, but in period 2 can employ their private information to offer type-dependent contracts to their first-period customer base. I find that in period 2, firms offer a transparent discount to continuing naives but not to sophisticates, thereby making the less profitable sophisticates more prone to switch to poaching competitors. Uninformed competitors therefore adversely attract unprofitable sophisticates, leading them to compete less vigorously. This allows firms to earn positive margins on continuing naives, while breaking even on sophisticates. Since the adverse attraction of sophisticates mitigates competition, margins from naives increase in the share of sophisticates and firms prefer an even mix of both customer types. I also show that if firms can educate (some) naives about hidden fees, competition is already mitigated when firms compete for customers in the first period with symmetric information. Intuitively, firms coordinate prices in period 1 to prevent education in period 2. As a result, total profits increase already before firms learn about their customers’ naivete. I analyze a policy that discloses customer information to all firms and thereby increases consumer surplus, and illustrate the robustness of results through several extensions.","PeriodicalId":51342,"journal":{"name":"Rand Journal of Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1756-2171.12318","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic competition in deceptive markets\",\"authors\":\"J. Johnen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1756-2171.12318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In many deceptive markets, firms design contracts to exploit mistakes of naive consumers. These contracts also attract less profitable sophisticated consumers. I study such markets when firms compete repeatedly and gather usage data about their customers which is informative about the likelihood of a customer being sophisticated. I find that in sharp contrast to a model with only rational consumers, this customer information is of great value to its owner despite perfect competition. Formally, I introduce a two-period model in which all consumers are aware of a transparent price component. Naives additionally pay a hidden fee, e.g. for an add-on service, that they do not take into account. Competing firms cannot discriminate between new consumers, but in period 2 can employ their private information to offer type-dependent contracts to their first-period customer base. I find that in period 2, firms offer a transparent discount to continuing naives but not to sophisticates, thereby making the less profitable sophisticates more prone to switch to poaching competitors. Uninformed competitors therefore adversely attract unprofitable sophisticates, leading them to compete less vigorously. This allows firms to earn positive margins on continuing naives, while breaking even on sophisticates. Since the adverse attraction of sophisticates mitigates competition, margins from naives increase in the share of sophisticates and firms prefer an even mix of both customer types. I also show that if firms can educate (some) naives about hidden fees, competition is already mitigated when firms compete for customers in the first period with symmetric information. Intuitively, firms coordinate prices in period 1 to prevent education in period 2. As a result, total profits increase already before firms learn about their customers’ naivete. I analyze a policy that discloses customer information to all firms and thereby increases consumer surplus, and illustrate the robustness of results through several extensions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rand Journal of Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1756-2171.12318\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rand Journal of Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12318\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rand Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

在许多欺骗性市场中,公司设计合同是为了利用天真消费者的错误。这些合同也吸引了利润较低的老练消费者。当公司反复竞争时,我会研究这样的市场,并收集客户的使用数据,这些数据可以提供客户成熟的可能性。我发现,与只有理性消费者的模式形成鲜明对比的是,尽管存在完美的竞争,但这些客户信息对其所有者来说具有巨大价值。从形式上讲,我介绍了一个两个时期的模型,在这个模型中,所有消费者都知道透明的价格成分。Naives还支付了一笔隐藏费用,例如附加服务,但他们没有考虑到这一点。竞争公司不能歧视新消费者,但在第二阶段,可以利用他们的私人信息向第一阶段的客户群提供依赖类型的合同。我发现,在第二阶段,公司对持续的天真者提供了透明的折扣,但对老练者没有,从而使利润较低的老练者更容易转向挖角竞争对手。因此,不知情的竞争对手会对无利可图的老练人才产生不利影响,导致他们的竞争不那么激烈。这使得公司能够在持续天真的基础上获得正利润,同时在复杂的基础上实现盈亏平衡。由于老练的人的不利吸引力会缓解竞争,天真的利润会增加老练的人所占的份额,公司更喜欢这两种客户类型的均匀组合。我还表明,如果企业能够教育(一些)天真的人隐藏费用,那么当企业在第一阶段利用对称信息竞争客户时,竞争已经减轻了。直觉上,企业在第一阶段协调价格,以阻止第二阶段的教育。因此,在公司了解客户的天真之前,总利润就已经增加了。我分析了一项向所有公司披露客户信息从而增加消费者盈余的政策,并通过几个扩展说明了结果的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamic competition in deceptive markets
In many deceptive markets, firms design contracts to exploit mistakes of naive consumers. These contracts also attract less profitable sophisticated consumers. I study such markets when firms compete repeatedly and gather usage data about their customers which is informative about the likelihood of a customer being sophisticated. I find that in sharp contrast to a model with only rational consumers, this customer information is of great value to its owner despite perfect competition. Formally, I introduce a two-period model in which all consumers are aware of a transparent price component. Naives additionally pay a hidden fee, e.g. for an add-on service, that they do not take into account. Competing firms cannot discriminate between new consumers, but in period 2 can employ their private information to offer type-dependent contracts to their first-period customer base. I find that in period 2, firms offer a transparent discount to continuing naives but not to sophisticates, thereby making the less profitable sophisticates more prone to switch to poaching competitors. Uninformed competitors therefore adversely attract unprofitable sophisticates, leading them to compete less vigorously. This allows firms to earn positive margins on continuing naives, while breaking even on sophisticates. Since the adverse attraction of sophisticates mitigates competition, margins from naives increase in the share of sophisticates and firms prefer an even mix of both customer types. I also show that if firms can educate (some) naives about hidden fees, competition is already mitigated when firms compete for customers in the first period with symmetric information. Intuitively, firms coordinate prices in period 1 to prevent education in period 2. As a result, total profits increase already before firms learn about their customers’ naivete. I analyze a policy that discloses customer information to all firms and thereby increases consumer surplus, and illustrate the robustness of results through several extensions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The RAND Journal of Economics publishes theoretical and empirical research on industrial organization and closely related topics, including contracts, organizations, law and economics, and regulation. The RAND Journal of Economics, formerly the Bell Journal of Economics, is published quarterly by The RAND Corporation, in conjunction with Blackwell Publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信