在线考试对远程学习者考试质量和考试修改经验的影响:来自英国开放大学的观点

Simon Cross, M. Aristeidou, Klaus-Dieter Rossade, Carlton Wood, Andrew Brasher
{"title":"在线考试对远程学习者考试质量和考试修改经验的影响:来自英国开放大学的观点","authors":"Simon Cross, M. Aristeidou, Klaus-Dieter Rossade, Carlton Wood, Andrew Brasher","doi":"10.24059/olj.v27i2.3761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports findings from a research study at The Open University, UK into the quality of distance learners’ online exam experience and the differences in experience between online (pandemic) and in-person (pre-pandemic) modes of examination. Our research responds to the ongoing need for greater insight into the exam experience and is uniquely positioned in two ways. First, we made use of a robust reference dataset collected before the COVID-19 pandemic and compared this with a second survey administered a year after the pandemic started; second, we asked students about their experience preparing and revising for the exam as well as the exam itself. Exam revision represents an important transitional period for learners. Our results show that, overall, the shift to online remote exams did not impact the quality of distance learners’ experience of revising for exams or taking the exam itself. We found no significant change in the revision experience across six of eight measures, including the learning benefits of learning while revising, enjoyment, and support. However, students reported feeling less anxious when revising for online exams. The quality of the exam experience itself was largely unaffected by the move from in-person to online remote exams. No significant differences were found for seven of the nine measures of exam experience. However, we found satisfaction with the exam environment was significantly higher for online exams and that learners felt the online exam was harder than they expected. Age and gender differences are also explored.  ","PeriodicalId":93037,"journal":{"name":"Online learning : the official journal of the Online Learning Consortium","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Online Exams on the Quality of Distance Learners' Exam and Exam Revision Experience: Perspectives from The Open University UK\",\"authors\":\"Simon Cross, M. Aristeidou, Klaus-Dieter Rossade, Carlton Wood, Andrew Brasher\",\"doi\":\"10.24059/olj.v27i2.3761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reports findings from a research study at The Open University, UK into the quality of distance learners’ online exam experience and the differences in experience between online (pandemic) and in-person (pre-pandemic) modes of examination. Our research responds to the ongoing need for greater insight into the exam experience and is uniquely positioned in two ways. First, we made use of a robust reference dataset collected before the COVID-19 pandemic and compared this with a second survey administered a year after the pandemic started; second, we asked students about their experience preparing and revising for the exam as well as the exam itself. Exam revision represents an important transitional period for learners. Our results show that, overall, the shift to online remote exams did not impact the quality of distance learners’ experience of revising for exams or taking the exam itself. We found no significant change in the revision experience across six of eight measures, including the learning benefits of learning while revising, enjoyment, and support. However, students reported feeling less anxious when revising for online exams. The quality of the exam experience itself was largely unaffected by the move from in-person to online remote exams. No significant differences were found for seven of the nine measures of exam experience. However, we found satisfaction with the exam environment was significantly higher for online exams and that learners felt the online exam was harder than they expected. Age and gender differences are also explored.  \",\"PeriodicalId\":93037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online learning : the official journal of the Online Learning Consortium\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online learning : the official journal of the Online Learning Consortium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online learning : the official journal of the Online Learning Consortium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文报告了英国开放大学的一项研究结果,该研究涉及远程学习者的在线考试体验质量,以及在线(疫情)和面对面(疫情前)考试模式之间的体验差异。我们的研究回应了正在进行的 需要对考试经验有更深入的了解 以两种方式独特定位。首先,我们使用了新冠肺炎大流行前收集的强大参考数据集,并将其与大流行开始一年后进行的第二次调查进行了比较;其次,我们询问了学生们的备考和复习经验,以及考试本身。复习考试对学习者来说是一个重要的过渡期。我们的研究结果表明,总体而言,向在线远程考试的转变并没有影响远程学习者复习考试或参加考试的体验质量。我们发现,八项指标中有六项的复习经验没有显著变化,包括边复习边学习的学习益处、享受和支持。然而,学生们报告说,在复习网上考试时,他们感到不那么焦虑。从面对面考试转向在线远程考试,考试体验本身的质量在很大程度上没有受到影响。在九项考试经验测量中,有七项没有发现显著差异。然而,我们发现在线考试对考试环境的满意度明显更高,学习者觉得在线考试比他们预期的更难。还探讨了年龄和性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Online Exams on the Quality of Distance Learners' Exam and Exam Revision Experience: Perspectives from The Open University UK
This paper reports findings from a research study at The Open University, UK into the quality of distance learners’ online exam experience and the differences in experience between online (pandemic) and in-person (pre-pandemic) modes of examination. Our research responds to the ongoing need for greater insight into the exam experience and is uniquely positioned in two ways. First, we made use of a robust reference dataset collected before the COVID-19 pandemic and compared this with a second survey administered a year after the pandemic started; second, we asked students about their experience preparing and revising for the exam as well as the exam itself. Exam revision represents an important transitional period for learners. Our results show that, overall, the shift to online remote exams did not impact the quality of distance learners’ experience of revising for exams or taking the exam itself. We found no significant change in the revision experience across six of eight measures, including the learning benefits of learning while revising, enjoyment, and support. However, students reported feeling less anxious when revising for online exams. The quality of the exam experience itself was largely unaffected by the move from in-person to online remote exams. No significant differences were found for seven of the nine measures of exam experience. However, we found satisfaction with the exam environment was significantly higher for online exams and that learners felt the online exam was harder than they expected. Age and gender differences are also explored.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信