罗斯福的法院包装与民权斗争

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
Zachary Jonas
{"title":"罗斯福的法院包装与民权斗争","authors":"Zachary Jonas","doi":"10.1353/sch.2023.a901539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and safety from racial violence into a coherent package. Davis, a thirty-two-year-old Harvard Law graduate and the first full-time civil rights lobbyist in American history, was no stranger to the ritualized sparring of congressional testimony.4 Introduced by the Committee Chairman as “a witness who represents a large number of colored people,” Davis was a widely recognized spokesman for the Black left and national secretary of the National Negro Congress (NNC).5 Although little known today, he was a towering civil rights figure during the 1930s, described by one biographer as “inspir[ing] more excitement, energy, and protest at the black grassroots level than any African American since Marcus Garvey.”6 In his testimony, he laid out detailed arguments for his position, directly cited and harshly criticized specific Supreme Court precedents, and deftly parried the “vicious questions” of pro-segregation Southern senators.7 Although his remarks, ignored by the On April 16, 1937, a radical young lawyer named John P. Davis testified before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary in favor of President Roosevelt’s Courtpacking plan.1 As the only Black witness to testify over nearly five weeks of hearings, Davis argued that increasing the size of the Supreme Court would push the United States towards racial equality while protecting the civil rights of Black Americans.2 When white witnesses touched briefly on Black issues, they almost uniformly argued against Courtpacking and advocated the so-called bulwark theory of civil rights, expressed in some quarters of the Black community, that the Court was a final refuge for vindicating the rights of individual Black Americans targeted by the oppressive racial violence of Southern states and denied justice by Southern courts.3 But Davis represented a very different vision of civil rights, originating in left-wing parts of the Black community, that integrated labor and economic issues, citizenship rights, FDR’s Court-packing and the Struggle for Civil Rights","PeriodicalId":41873,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Supreme Court History","volume":"48 1","pages":"215 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FDR’s Court-packing and the Struggle for Civil Rights\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Jonas\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sch.2023.a901539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"and safety from racial violence into a coherent package. Davis, a thirty-two-year-old Harvard Law graduate and the first full-time civil rights lobbyist in American history, was no stranger to the ritualized sparring of congressional testimony.4 Introduced by the Committee Chairman as “a witness who represents a large number of colored people,” Davis was a widely recognized spokesman for the Black left and national secretary of the National Negro Congress (NNC).5 Although little known today, he was a towering civil rights figure during the 1930s, described by one biographer as “inspir[ing] more excitement, energy, and protest at the black grassroots level than any African American since Marcus Garvey.”6 In his testimony, he laid out detailed arguments for his position, directly cited and harshly criticized specific Supreme Court precedents, and deftly parried the “vicious questions” of pro-segregation Southern senators.7 Although his remarks, ignored by the On April 16, 1937, a radical young lawyer named John P. Davis testified before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary in favor of President Roosevelt’s Courtpacking plan.1 As the only Black witness to testify over nearly five weeks of hearings, Davis argued that increasing the size of the Supreme Court would push the United States towards racial equality while protecting the civil rights of Black Americans.2 When white witnesses touched briefly on Black issues, they almost uniformly argued against Courtpacking and advocated the so-called bulwark theory of civil rights, expressed in some quarters of the Black community, that the Court was a final refuge for vindicating the rights of individual Black Americans targeted by the oppressive racial violence of Southern states and denied justice by Southern courts.3 But Davis represented a very different vision of civil rights, originating in left-wing parts of the Black community, that integrated labor and economic issues, citizenship rights, FDR’s Court-packing and the Struggle for Civil Rights\",\"PeriodicalId\":41873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Supreme Court History\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"215 - 238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Supreme Court History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sch.2023.a901539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Supreme Court History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sch.2023.a901539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以及防止种族暴力的安全措施。戴维斯今年32岁,毕业于哈佛大学法学院,是美国历史上第一位全职的民权游说者,他对国会证词的仪式化辩论并不陌生戴维斯被委员会主席介绍为“代表大量有色人种的证人”,他是被广泛认可的黑人左派发言人和全国黑人大会(NNC)的全国秘书尽管今天鲜为人知,但他在20世纪30年代是一位杰出的民权人物,一位传记作家形容他“在黑人基层激起的兴奋、活力和抗议比马库斯·加维(Marcus Garvey)以来的任何一位非裔美国人都要多。”在他的证词中,他为自己的立场提出了详细的论据,直接引用并严厉批评了最高法院的具体判例,并巧妙地回避了支持种族隔离的南方参议员提出的“恶毒问题”1937年4月16日,一位名叫约翰·p·戴维斯的激进的年轻律师在美国参议院司法委员会作证,支持罗斯福总统的法庭安排计划作为在近五周的听证会上作证的唯一一名黑人证人,戴维斯认为,扩大最高法院的规模将推动美国走向种族平等,同时保护黑人的公民权利。当白人证人简短地谈到黑人问题时,他们几乎一致反对法院拥挤,并主张所谓的民权堡垒理论,这种理论在黑人社区的某些地区得到了表达。2 .最高法院是维护受到南方各州种族暴力压迫和南方法院剥夺正义待遇的美国黑人个人权利的最后避难所但戴维斯代表了一种截然不同的民权观,这种民权观起源于黑人社区的左翼,将劳工和经济问题、公民权、罗斯福的“打官司”和民权斗争结合在一起
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FDR’s Court-packing and the Struggle for Civil Rights
and safety from racial violence into a coherent package. Davis, a thirty-two-year-old Harvard Law graduate and the first full-time civil rights lobbyist in American history, was no stranger to the ritualized sparring of congressional testimony.4 Introduced by the Committee Chairman as “a witness who represents a large number of colored people,” Davis was a widely recognized spokesman for the Black left and national secretary of the National Negro Congress (NNC).5 Although little known today, he was a towering civil rights figure during the 1930s, described by one biographer as “inspir[ing] more excitement, energy, and protest at the black grassroots level than any African American since Marcus Garvey.”6 In his testimony, he laid out detailed arguments for his position, directly cited and harshly criticized specific Supreme Court precedents, and deftly parried the “vicious questions” of pro-segregation Southern senators.7 Although his remarks, ignored by the On April 16, 1937, a radical young lawyer named John P. Davis testified before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary in favor of President Roosevelt’s Courtpacking plan.1 As the only Black witness to testify over nearly five weeks of hearings, Davis argued that increasing the size of the Supreme Court would push the United States towards racial equality while protecting the civil rights of Black Americans.2 When white witnesses touched briefly on Black issues, they almost uniformly argued against Courtpacking and advocated the so-called bulwark theory of civil rights, expressed in some quarters of the Black community, that the Court was a final refuge for vindicating the rights of individual Black Americans targeted by the oppressive racial violence of Southern states and denied justice by Southern courts.3 But Davis represented a very different vision of civil rights, originating in left-wing parts of the Black community, that integrated labor and economic issues, citizenship rights, FDR’s Court-packing and the Struggle for Civil Rights
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信