{"title":"反犹太主义准则。反思语言、法律和司法对19世纪德国犹太人敌视形式的影响。和20。100年","authors":"Christoph Jahr","doi":"10.1515/asch-2022-2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Using examples from the late 19th century to the present, it will be discussed to what extent anti-Semitism was shaped by a »legal code«. The pressure of legal repression, however weak it may have been at times, caused anti-Semites to retreat to language formulas that were no longer (or not yet) legally objectionable, without therefore giving up their convictions. This borderline is fundamentally semantically indeterminable, because associations, puns and cynicism cannot be banned. The legal instruments often come to nothing, because a judiciary under the rule of law may only sanction deeds, not thoughts. Each judgement inevitably redefines this borderline, at least in nuances. By contributing in this way to constituting the discursive framework of anti-Semitism, even if there is a broad social consensus of its ostracism, the law is both a partial solution and part of the problem.","PeriodicalId":40863,"journal":{"name":"Aschkenas-Zeitschrift fuer Geschichte und Kultur der Juden","volume":"32 1","pages":"357 - 375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kodierungen des Antisemitismus. Überlegungen zum Einfluss von Sprache, Recht und Justiz auf die Gestalt der Judenfeindschaft in Deutschland im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert\",\"authors\":\"Christoph Jahr\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/asch-2022-2021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Using examples from the late 19th century to the present, it will be discussed to what extent anti-Semitism was shaped by a »legal code«. The pressure of legal repression, however weak it may have been at times, caused anti-Semites to retreat to language formulas that were no longer (or not yet) legally objectionable, without therefore giving up their convictions. This borderline is fundamentally semantically indeterminable, because associations, puns and cynicism cannot be banned. The legal instruments often come to nothing, because a judiciary under the rule of law may only sanction deeds, not thoughts. Each judgement inevitably redefines this borderline, at least in nuances. By contributing in this way to constituting the discursive framework of anti-Semitism, even if there is a broad social consensus of its ostracism, the law is both a partial solution and part of the problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aschkenas-Zeitschrift fuer Geschichte und Kultur der Juden\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"357 - 375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aschkenas-Zeitschrift fuer Geschichte und Kultur der Juden\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/asch-2022-2021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aschkenas-Zeitschrift fuer Geschichte und Kultur der Juden","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/asch-2022-2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Kodierungen des Antisemitismus. Überlegungen zum Einfluss von Sprache, Recht und Justiz auf die Gestalt der Judenfeindschaft in Deutschland im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert
Abstract Using examples from the late 19th century to the present, it will be discussed to what extent anti-Semitism was shaped by a »legal code«. The pressure of legal repression, however weak it may have been at times, caused anti-Semites to retreat to language formulas that were no longer (or not yet) legally objectionable, without therefore giving up their convictions. This borderline is fundamentally semantically indeterminable, because associations, puns and cynicism cannot be banned. The legal instruments often come to nothing, because a judiciary under the rule of law may only sanction deeds, not thoughts. Each judgement inevitably redefines this borderline, at least in nuances. By contributing in this way to constituting the discursive framework of anti-Semitism, even if there is a broad social consensus of its ostracism, the law is both a partial solution and part of the problem.