黑暗的居民:秘鲁宪法法院关于监狱中被剥夺自由者平等权利的判例

Q3 Social Sciences
Abraham Siles
{"title":"黑暗的居民:秘鲁宪法法院关于监狱中被剥夺自由者平等权利的判例","authors":"Abraham Siles","doi":"10.4067/s0718-52002021000100309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The article examines the extent to which Peruvian Constitutional Court case law protects the fundamental rights of persons deprived of liberty in prisons, in application of the right / principle of equality. For this, two conceptions of equality are contrasted: equality as non-discrimination and equality as non-subjugation. Special attention is paid to this second vision, as ideal for addressing the situation of groups that suffer structural discrimination or that are in a situation of special vulnerability, as is proposed to be the case with prison inmates. The article finds that Constitutional Court case law of Peru seeks to protect the equal enjoyment and exercise of fundamental rights by prison inmates, showing favorable evolution over time. In particular, the use of corrective habeas corpus and, more recently, of the declaration of unconstitutional state of affairs is interesting, in the case of prisoners with mental disabilities and in the case of prison overcrowding. However, pending tasks remain, such as improving the recognition and participation of prison inmates as a disadvantaged group.","PeriodicalId":39109,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Constitucionales","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moradores de tinieblas: la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional peruano ante el derecho a la igualdad de personas privadas de libertad en centros penitenciarios\",\"authors\":\"Abraham Siles\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0718-52002021000100309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": The article examines the extent to which Peruvian Constitutional Court case law protects the fundamental rights of persons deprived of liberty in prisons, in application of the right / principle of equality. For this, two conceptions of equality are contrasted: equality as non-discrimination and equality as non-subjugation. Special attention is paid to this second vision, as ideal for addressing the situation of groups that suffer structural discrimination or that are in a situation of special vulnerability, as is proposed to be the case with prison inmates. The article finds that Constitutional Court case law of Peru seeks to protect the equal enjoyment and exercise of fundamental rights by prison inmates, showing favorable evolution over time. In particular, the use of corrective habeas corpus and, more recently, of the declaration of unconstitutional state of affairs is interesting, in the case of prisoners with mental disabilities and in the case of prison overcrowding. However, pending tasks remain, such as improving the recognition and participation of prison inmates as a disadvantaged group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudios Constitucionales\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudios Constitucionales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52002021000100309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Constitucionales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52002021000100309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:这篇文章审查了秘鲁宪法法院判例法在适用平等权利/原则的情况下,在多大程度上保护监狱中被剥夺自由者的基本权利。为此,对比了两种平等概念:不歧视的平等和不征服的平等。对第二种设想给予了特别注意,因为它是处理遭受结构性歧视或处于特别易受伤害的群体的情况的理想办法,正如所建议的监狱囚犯的情况。文章发现,秘鲁宪法法院判例法旨在保护监狱囚犯平等享受和行使基本权利,并随着时间的推移呈现出有利的演变。特别值得注意的是,在精神残疾囚犯和监狱过度拥挤的情况下,使用纠正性人身保护令和最近宣布违反宪法的情况令人感兴趣。然而,仍有待完成的任务,例如提高对监狱囚犯作为弱势群体的认识和参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moradores de tinieblas: la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional peruano ante el derecho a la igualdad de personas privadas de libertad en centros penitenciarios
: The article examines the extent to which Peruvian Constitutional Court case law protects the fundamental rights of persons deprived of liberty in prisons, in application of the right / principle of equality. For this, two conceptions of equality are contrasted: equality as non-discrimination and equality as non-subjugation. Special attention is paid to this second vision, as ideal for addressing the situation of groups that suffer structural discrimination or that are in a situation of special vulnerability, as is proposed to be the case with prison inmates. The article finds that Constitutional Court case law of Peru seeks to protect the equal enjoyment and exercise of fundamental rights by prison inmates, showing favorable evolution over time. In particular, the use of corrective habeas corpus and, more recently, of the declaration of unconstitutional state of affairs is interesting, in the case of prisoners with mental disabilities and in the case of prison overcrowding. However, pending tasks remain, such as improving the recognition and participation of prison inmates as a disadvantaged group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Estudios Constitucionales
Estudios Constitucionales Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信