政治意识形态与消费:视角与效应

IF 2.1 Q3 BUSINESS
Rashmi Adaval, R. Wyer
{"title":"政治意识形态与消费:视角与效应","authors":"Rashmi Adaval, R. Wyer","doi":"10.1086/720513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T he influence of political ideology on individuals’ behavior and their endorsement of social policies is pervasive, and its impact on their economic and social well-being is incontrovertible. The influence of political ideology is evident not only in how recent social events have been interpreted (e.g., the storming of the Capitol on January 6, the murder of George Floyd, etc.) but also in people’s everyday nonpolitical behavior (e.g., their choice and purchases of consumer goods and other consumption-related activity). The research reported in this special issue documents the effects of political ideology on reactions to various consumption-related experiences. Although no single theory of political ideology can easily account for the diversity of the phenomena reported in this special issue, an understanding of the different perspectives from which political ideology has been studied is helpful to understand these effects. Much of the research on political ideology identifies people with different beliefs along on a liberalism-conservatism dimension. Although these end points are closely aligned with Democratic and Republican political parties, party identity is not always consistent with people’s beliefs on specific issues (Wyer et al. 1991; Huddy, Mason, and Aaroe 2015). Yet the current disposition of federal legislators to vote along party lines and the polarized attitudes of those who belong to these parties suggest that the schism emerges partly from deep-seated differences in ideological beliefs and thinking styles. Differences in conservative-liberal beliefs have been attributed to personality, evolution and genetics, all of which presumably affect the cognitive andphysiological reactions of individuals to a variety of issues. In the following section, we provide a background of research that has been conducted from different perspectives. We then review the research reported in this volume in relation to these perspectives.","PeriodicalId":36388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research","volume":"7 1","pages":"247 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Ideology and Consumption: Perspectives and Effects\",\"authors\":\"Rashmi Adaval, R. Wyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/720513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"T he influence of political ideology on individuals’ behavior and their endorsement of social policies is pervasive, and its impact on their economic and social well-being is incontrovertible. The influence of political ideology is evident not only in how recent social events have been interpreted (e.g., the storming of the Capitol on January 6, the murder of George Floyd, etc.) but also in people’s everyday nonpolitical behavior (e.g., their choice and purchases of consumer goods and other consumption-related activity). The research reported in this special issue documents the effects of political ideology on reactions to various consumption-related experiences. Although no single theory of political ideology can easily account for the diversity of the phenomena reported in this special issue, an understanding of the different perspectives from which political ideology has been studied is helpful to understand these effects. Much of the research on political ideology identifies people with different beliefs along on a liberalism-conservatism dimension. Although these end points are closely aligned with Democratic and Republican political parties, party identity is not always consistent with people’s beliefs on specific issues (Wyer et al. 1991; Huddy, Mason, and Aaroe 2015). Yet the current disposition of federal legislators to vote along party lines and the polarized attitudes of those who belong to these parties suggest that the schism emerges partly from deep-seated differences in ideological beliefs and thinking styles. Differences in conservative-liberal beliefs have been attributed to personality, evolution and genetics, all of which presumably affect the cognitive andphysiological reactions of individuals to a variety of issues. In the following section, we provide a background of research that has been conducted from different perspectives. We then review the research reported in this volume in relation to these perspectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"247 - 254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/720513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/720513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

政治意识形态对个人行为和对社会政策的认可的影响是普遍的,它对他们的经济和社会福祉的影响是无可争议的。政治意识形态的影响不仅体现在对最近社会事件的解读上(例如,1月6日冲击国会大厦、乔治·弗洛伊德被谋杀等),也体现在人们的日常非政治行为上(例如他们对消费品和其他消费相关活动的选择和购买)。本期特刊报道的研究记录了政治意识形态对各种消费相关体验反应的影响。尽管没有一种单一的政治意识形态理论可以轻易地解释本期特刊中报道的现象的多样性,但了解研究政治意识形态的不同视角有助于理解这些影响。许多关于政治意识形态的研究都在自由主义-保守主义的维度上识别出不同信仰的人。尽管这些终点与民主党和共和党政党密切一致,但政党身份并不总是与人们对特定问题的信念一致(Wyer等人,1991;Huddy、Mason和Aaroe,2015年)。然而,目前联邦立法者按照党派路线投票的倾向以及这些党派成员的两极分化态度表明,分裂部分源于意识形态信仰和思维方式的深层次差异。保守自由主义信仰的差异被归因于个性、进化和遗传学,所有这些都可能影响个人对各种问题的认知和生理反应。在下一节中,我们提供了从不同角度进行的研究的背景。然后,我们回顾了本卷中与这些观点相关的研究报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Political Ideology and Consumption: Perspectives and Effects
T he influence of political ideology on individuals’ behavior and their endorsement of social policies is pervasive, and its impact on their economic and social well-being is incontrovertible. The influence of political ideology is evident not only in how recent social events have been interpreted (e.g., the storming of the Capitol on January 6, the murder of George Floyd, etc.) but also in people’s everyday nonpolitical behavior (e.g., their choice and purchases of consumer goods and other consumption-related activity). The research reported in this special issue documents the effects of political ideology on reactions to various consumption-related experiences. Although no single theory of political ideology can easily account for the diversity of the phenomena reported in this special issue, an understanding of the different perspectives from which political ideology has been studied is helpful to understand these effects. Much of the research on political ideology identifies people with different beliefs along on a liberalism-conservatism dimension. Although these end points are closely aligned with Democratic and Republican political parties, party identity is not always consistent with people’s beliefs on specific issues (Wyer et al. 1991; Huddy, Mason, and Aaroe 2015). Yet the current disposition of federal legislators to vote along party lines and the polarized attitudes of those who belong to these parties suggest that the schism emerges partly from deep-seated differences in ideological beliefs and thinking styles. Differences in conservative-liberal beliefs have been attributed to personality, evolution and genetics, all of which presumably affect the cognitive andphysiological reactions of individuals to a variety of issues. In the following section, we provide a background of research that has been conducted from different perspectives. We then review the research reported in this volume in relation to these perspectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信