电视胸腔镜治疗原发性自发性肺气肿患者肺下韧带的分割对术后恢复或复发没有影响

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Chao-Chun Chang, W. Lai, Y. Tseng, Y. Yen
{"title":"电视胸腔镜治疗原发性自发性肺气肿患者肺下韧带的分割对术后恢复或复发没有影响","authors":"Chao-Chun Chang, W. Lai, Y. Tseng, Y. Yen","doi":"10.21037/vats.2019.08.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Division of inferior pulmonary ligament (IPL) after upper lobectomy was reported to prevent air leak. The research purpose is to investigate whether division of IPL for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) would decrease air leak and recurrence. \n Methods: Between 2013/10 and 2015/9, all the patients younger than 30 years old in our institution undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for PSP were included in this study. Patient with odd chart number underwent division of IPL in addition to VATS wedge resection and pleurodesis for PSP, whereas patients with even chart number underwent VATS wedge resection and pleurodesis without division of IPL. The patient’s age, gender, operative time, and recurrence were all recorded. Chest plain films were taken on the postoperative day 1 (POD1), postoperative day 7 (POD7), and two months after discharge to observe residual pleural space. \n Results: A total of 110 patients were included in this study. The IPL was divided in 51 patients (rIPL group), and preserved in the other 59 patients (control group). The operative time increased in rIPL group slightly without significant difference (rIPL 81.1 verse control 88.4 minutes, P=0.539). The residual pleural space on the follow-up chest X-ray did not differ between these two groups. They both had similar chest tube drainage days (rIPL 2.7 days versus control 3.1 days, P=0.393). During the follow-up period, one patient in rIPL group (2.0%) and three patients (5.1%) in control group had recurrent pneumothorax (P=0.622). \n Conclusions: Division of IPL for PSP did not provide clinical benefit of reduction air leak or recurrence rate.","PeriodicalId":42086,"journal":{"name":"Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/vats.2019.08.03","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Division of inferior pulmonary ligament did not impact on the postoperative recovery or recurrence in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax\",\"authors\":\"Chao-Chun Chang, W. Lai, Y. Tseng, Y. Yen\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/vats.2019.08.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Division of inferior pulmonary ligament (IPL) after upper lobectomy was reported to prevent air leak. The research purpose is to investigate whether division of IPL for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) would decrease air leak and recurrence. \\n Methods: Between 2013/10 and 2015/9, all the patients younger than 30 years old in our institution undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for PSP were included in this study. Patient with odd chart number underwent division of IPL in addition to VATS wedge resection and pleurodesis for PSP, whereas patients with even chart number underwent VATS wedge resection and pleurodesis without division of IPL. The patient’s age, gender, operative time, and recurrence were all recorded. Chest plain films were taken on the postoperative day 1 (POD1), postoperative day 7 (POD7), and two months after discharge to observe residual pleural space. \\n Results: A total of 110 patients were included in this study. The IPL was divided in 51 patients (rIPL group), and preserved in the other 59 patients (control group). The operative time increased in rIPL group slightly without significant difference (rIPL 81.1 verse control 88.4 minutes, P=0.539). The residual pleural space on the follow-up chest X-ray did not differ between these two groups. They both had similar chest tube drainage days (rIPL 2.7 days versus control 3.1 days, P=0.393). During the follow-up period, one patient in rIPL group (2.0%) and three patients (5.1%) in control group had recurrent pneumothorax (P=0.622). \\n Conclusions: Division of IPL for PSP did not provide clinical benefit of reduction air leak or recurrence rate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/vats.2019.08.03\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/vats.2019.08.03\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/vats.2019.08.03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:报道上肺叶切除术后切开肺下韧带(IPL)以防止漏气。本研究的目的是探讨原发性自发性气胸(PSP)切开IPL是否能减少漏气和复发。方法:选取2013/10 ~ 2015/9期间我院所有年龄小于30岁接受电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)治疗PSP的患者。奇数图号患者行IPL分割+ VATS楔形切除+胸膜固定术治疗PSP,偶数图号患者行VATS楔形切除+胸膜固定术治疗IPL不分割。记录患者的年龄、性别、手术时间、复发情况。术后第1天(POD1)、术后第7天(POD7)、出院后2个月分别拍摄胸部平片,观察胸膜间隙残留情况。结果:本研究共纳入110例患者。IPL分为51例(rIPL组),其余59例(对照组)保留。rIPL组手术时间略有增加,但差异无统计学意义(rIPL组81.1分钟,对照组88.4分钟,P=0.539)。在随访的x线胸膜间隙上,两组之间没有差异。两组胸管引流天数相似(rIPL组2.7天,对照组3.1天,P=0.393)。随访期间,rIPL组复发气胸1例(2.0%),对照组3例(5.1%)(P=0.622)。结论:分割IPL治疗PSP并没有减少漏风和复发率的临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Division of inferior pulmonary ligament did not impact on the postoperative recovery or recurrence in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax
Background: Division of inferior pulmonary ligament (IPL) after upper lobectomy was reported to prevent air leak. The research purpose is to investigate whether division of IPL for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) would decrease air leak and recurrence. Methods: Between 2013/10 and 2015/9, all the patients younger than 30 years old in our institution undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for PSP were included in this study. Patient with odd chart number underwent division of IPL in addition to VATS wedge resection and pleurodesis for PSP, whereas patients with even chart number underwent VATS wedge resection and pleurodesis without division of IPL. The patient’s age, gender, operative time, and recurrence were all recorded. Chest plain films were taken on the postoperative day 1 (POD1), postoperative day 7 (POD7), and two months after discharge to observe residual pleural space. Results: A total of 110 patients were included in this study. The IPL was divided in 51 patients (rIPL group), and preserved in the other 59 patients (control group). The operative time increased in rIPL group slightly without significant difference (rIPL 81.1 verse control 88.4 minutes, P=0.539). The residual pleural space on the follow-up chest X-ray did not differ between these two groups. They both had similar chest tube drainage days (rIPL 2.7 days versus control 3.1 days, P=0.393). During the follow-up period, one patient in rIPL group (2.0%) and three patients (5.1%) in control group had recurrent pneumothorax (P=0.622). Conclusions: Division of IPL for PSP did not provide clinical benefit of reduction air leak or recurrence rate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信