过多是件好事:质量差异化需求与垄断偏见

Charles L Adams
{"title":"过多是件好事:质量差异化需求与垄断偏见","authors":"Charles L Adams","doi":"10.1177/0569434521999988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous teaching notes focused on the logic and mechanics of a quality-differentiated linear demand structure. This note takes up the question of potential bias in how markets respond to quality-related aspects of consumer choice. Earlier examples demonstrated instances where monopoly interests might conflict with those of consumers in matters of quality choice. This article points to a more general propensity toward excessively high levels of quality under a monopoly market structure. JEL Classifications: D4, D41, D42","PeriodicalId":85623,"journal":{"name":"The American economist","volume":"67 1","pages":"123 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0569434521999988","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Too Much of a Good Thing: Quality-Differentiated Demand and Monopoly Bias\",\"authors\":\"Charles L Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0569434521999988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previous teaching notes focused on the logic and mechanics of a quality-differentiated linear demand structure. This note takes up the question of potential bias in how markets respond to quality-related aspects of consumer choice. Earlier examples demonstrated instances where monopoly interests might conflict with those of consumers in matters of quality choice. This article points to a more general propensity toward excessively high levels of quality under a monopoly market structure. JEL Classifications: D4, D41, D42\",\"PeriodicalId\":85623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American economist\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"123 - 131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0569434521999988\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American economist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0569434521999988\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American economist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0569434521999988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

以前的教学笔记侧重于质量差异化线性需求结构的逻辑和机制。本文讨论了市场如何对消费者选择的质量相关方面作出反应的潜在偏差问题。先前的例子表明,垄断利益可能与消费者在质量选择方面的利益发生冲突。本文指出,在垄断市场结构下,存在一种更普遍的过高质量水平的倾向。JEL分类:D4, D41, D42
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Too Much of a Good Thing: Quality-Differentiated Demand and Monopoly Bias
Previous teaching notes focused on the logic and mechanics of a quality-differentiated linear demand structure. This note takes up the question of potential bias in how markets respond to quality-related aspects of consumer choice. Earlier examples demonstrated instances where monopoly interests might conflict with those of consumers in matters of quality choice. This article points to a more general propensity toward excessively high levels of quality under a monopoly market structure. JEL Classifications: D4, D41, D42
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信