尖刺之冠

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY
David K. Wills
{"title":"尖刺之冠","authors":"David K. Wills","doi":"10.3366/drt.2020.0243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At a moment in the sixth session of Derrida's 1999 seminar on 'Perjury and Pardon' (2020), he makes this observation: 'One day, perhaps, a distinction will be made between two eras, between pre-AIDs thinkers and those who were born or lived late enough to encounter AIDS in the world and to have inscribed its motif in their thinking or writing' (my translation). His Comment is made against the background of an earlier discussion of the so-called 'contaminated blood' trial in France, where health administration and policy officials, manoeuvring in 1985 to help a French blood-screening process obtain a patent ahead of its American rival, exposed people having blood transfusions to infection with HIV. Two hundred and ninety seven patients and hemophiliacs were infected, which is, to say the least, an exponentially far Cry from those who have fallen victim to the current epoch-dividing moment, that of COVID-19 (in France, 209,640 infections and 30,032 deaths as of this writing). But Derrida's comment underscores his intense and longtime interest in things parasitic and viral, as they relate both to questions of life and immunity, and to considerations of fault and reconciliation. Were he alive and active today, we would expect him still to be inscribing those motifs in his thinking (as well, of course, sadly, mourning the loss of his wife fallen victim to the disease). ","PeriodicalId":42836,"journal":{"name":"Derrida Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crown of Spikes\",\"authors\":\"David K. Wills\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/drt.2020.0243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At a moment in the sixth session of Derrida's 1999 seminar on 'Perjury and Pardon' (2020), he makes this observation: 'One day, perhaps, a distinction will be made between two eras, between pre-AIDs thinkers and those who were born or lived late enough to encounter AIDS in the world and to have inscribed its motif in their thinking or writing' (my translation). His Comment is made against the background of an earlier discussion of the so-called 'contaminated blood' trial in France, where health administration and policy officials, manoeuvring in 1985 to help a French blood-screening process obtain a patent ahead of its American rival, exposed people having blood transfusions to infection with HIV. Two hundred and ninety seven patients and hemophiliacs were infected, which is, to say the least, an exponentially far Cry from those who have fallen victim to the current epoch-dividing moment, that of COVID-19 (in France, 209,640 infections and 30,032 deaths as of this writing). But Derrida's comment underscores his intense and longtime interest in things parasitic and viral, as they relate both to questions of life and immunity, and to considerations of fault and reconciliation. Were he alive and active today, we would expect him still to be inscribing those motifs in his thinking (as well, of course, sadly, mourning the loss of his wife fallen victim to the disease). \",\"PeriodicalId\":42836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Derrida Today\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Derrida Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/drt.2020.0243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Derrida Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/drt.2020.0243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在德里达1999年关于“陪审团与赦免”(2020)的研讨会第六届会议上,他发表了这样的评论:“也许有一天,两个时代之间会有区别,一个是艾滋病前的思想家,另一个是那些出生或生活得晚到足以在世界上遇到艾滋病并将其主题刻在思想或写作中的思想家”(我的翻译)。他的评论是在早些时候讨论法国所谓的“受污染血液”试验的背景下发表的。1985年,法国卫生行政部门和政策官员试图帮助法国的血液筛查程序在美国竞争对手之前获得专利,使输血的人感染了艾滋病毒。两百九十七名患者和血友病患者被感染,至少可以说,这与那些成为当前划时代时刻新冠肺炎受害者的人相去甚远(截至本文撰写之时,法国有209640人感染,30032人死亡)。但德里达的评论突显了他对寄生虫和病毒的强烈而长期的兴趣,因为它们既与生命和免疫力问题有关,也与过错和和解的考虑有关。如果他今天还活着并活跃起来,我们预计他仍会在脑海中刻下这些主题(当然,可悲的是,也会哀悼他因疾病而失去的妻子)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crown of Spikes
At a moment in the sixth session of Derrida's 1999 seminar on 'Perjury and Pardon' (2020), he makes this observation: 'One day, perhaps, a distinction will be made between two eras, between pre-AIDs thinkers and those who were born or lived late enough to encounter AIDS in the world and to have inscribed its motif in their thinking or writing' (my translation). His Comment is made against the background of an earlier discussion of the so-called 'contaminated blood' trial in France, where health administration and policy officials, manoeuvring in 1985 to help a French blood-screening process obtain a patent ahead of its American rival, exposed people having blood transfusions to infection with HIV. Two hundred and ninety seven patients and hemophiliacs were infected, which is, to say the least, an exponentially far Cry from those who have fallen victim to the current epoch-dividing moment, that of COVID-19 (in France, 209,640 infections and 30,032 deaths as of this writing). But Derrida's comment underscores his intense and longtime interest in things parasitic and viral, as they relate both to questions of life and immunity, and to considerations of fault and reconciliation. Were he alive and active today, we would expect him still to be inscribing those motifs in his thinking (as well, of course, sadly, mourning the loss of his wife fallen victim to the disease). 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Derrida Today
Derrida Today PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信