Andrew W Gardner, Polly S Montgomery, Ming Wang, Biyi Shen, Shangming Zhang, William A Pomilla
{"title":"符合体力活动时间强度指南与卧床、生活质量和克劳迪娅炎症的关系","authors":"Andrew W Gardner, Polly S Montgomery, Ming Wang, Biyi Shen, Shangming Zhang, William A Pomilla","doi":"10.1097/HCR.0000000000000686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this investigation was to determine if meeting the 2018 physical activity (PA) time-intensity guidelines was associated with better ambulatory function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), vascular function, and inflammation than failing to meet the guidelines in patients with peripheral artery disease and claudication. Second, we determined the optimal number of total steps/d and steps taken at moderate cadence needed to meet the PA time-intensity guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five hundred seventy-two patients were assessed on daily ambulatory activity for 1 wk with a step activity monitor, and were grouped according to whether they achieved <150 min/wk of moderate-intensity PA (group 1 = do not meet guidelines; n = 397) or whether they were above this threshold (group 2 = meet guidelines; n = 175).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treadmill peak walking time (mean ± SD) was higher ( P < .001) in group 2 (709 ± 359 sec) than in group 1 (427 ± 281 sec). The physical function HRQoL score was higher ( P < .001) in group 2 (61 ± 22%) than in group 1 (44 ± 21%). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein was lower ( P < .001) in group 2 (3.6 ± 4.5 mg/L) than in group 1 (5.9 ± 6.1 mg/L). Finally, ≥7675 total steps/d and ≥1660 steps/d at moderate cadence were optimal thresholds associated with meeting PA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with claudication who meet the 2018 PA time-intensity guidelines for US adults had better ambulation, HRQoL, and vascular outcomes than those who failed to meet the PA guidelines. Patients with claudication best achieved the PA time-intensity guidelines by taking ≥7675 total steps/d, and ≥1660 steps/d at a moderate cadence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention","volume":"42 1","pages":"E82-E89"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9535037/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Meeting Physical Activity Time-Intensity Guidelines With Ambulation, Quality of Life, and Inflammation in Claudication.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew W Gardner, Polly S Montgomery, Ming Wang, Biyi Shen, Shangming Zhang, William A Pomilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HCR.0000000000000686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this investigation was to determine if meeting the 2018 physical activity (PA) time-intensity guidelines was associated with better ambulatory function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), vascular function, and inflammation than failing to meet the guidelines in patients with peripheral artery disease and claudication. Second, we determined the optimal number of total steps/d and steps taken at moderate cadence needed to meet the PA time-intensity guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five hundred seventy-two patients were assessed on daily ambulatory activity for 1 wk with a step activity monitor, and were grouped according to whether they achieved <150 min/wk of moderate-intensity PA (group 1 = do not meet guidelines; n = 397) or whether they were above this threshold (group 2 = meet guidelines; n = 175).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treadmill peak walking time (mean ± SD) was higher ( P < .001) in group 2 (709 ± 359 sec) than in group 1 (427 ± 281 sec). The physical function HRQoL score was higher ( P < .001) in group 2 (61 ± 22%) than in group 1 (44 ± 21%). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein was lower ( P < .001) in group 2 (3.6 ± 4.5 mg/L) than in group 1 (5.9 ± 6.1 mg/L). Finally, ≥7675 total steps/d and ≥1660 steps/d at moderate cadence were optimal thresholds associated with meeting PA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with claudication who meet the 2018 PA time-intensity guidelines for US adults had better ambulation, HRQoL, and vascular outcomes than those who failed to meet the PA guidelines. Patients with claudication best achieved the PA time-intensity guidelines by taking ≥7675 total steps/d, and ≥1660 steps/d at a moderate cadence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"E82-E89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9535037/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000686\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/4/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000686","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association Between Meeting Physical Activity Time-Intensity Guidelines With Ambulation, Quality of Life, and Inflammation in Claudication.
Purpose: The aim of this investigation was to determine if meeting the 2018 physical activity (PA) time-intensity guidelines was associated with better ambulatory function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), vascular function, and inflammation than failing to meet the guidelines in patients with peripheral artery disease and claudication. Second, we determined the optimal number of total steps/d and steps taken at moderate cadence needed to meet the PA time-intensity guidelines.
Methods: Five hundred seventy-two patients were assessed on daily ambulatory activity for 1 wk with a step activity monitor, and were grouped according to whether they achieved <150 min/wk of moderate-intensity PA (group 1 = do not meet guidelines; n = 397) or whether they were above this threshold (group 2 = meet guidelines; n = 175).
Results: Treadmill peak walking time (mean ± SD) was higher ( P < .001) in group 2 (709 ± 359 sec) than in group 1 (427 ± 281 sec). The physical function HRQoL score was higher ( P < .001) in group 2 (61 ± 22%) than in group 1 (44 ± 21%). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein was lower ( P < .001) in group 2 (3.6 ± 4.5 mg/L) than in group 1 (5.9 ± 6.1 mg/L). Finally, ≥7675 total steps/d and ≥1660 steps/d at moderate cadence were optimal thresholds associated with meeting PA guidelines.
Conclusions: Patients with claudication who meet the 2018 PA time-intensity guidelines for US adults had better ambulation, HRQoL, and vascular outcomes than those who failed to meet the PA guidelines. Patients with claudication best achieved the PA time-intensity guidelines by taking ≥7675 total steps/d, and ≥1660 steps/d at a moderate cadence.
期刊介绍:
JCRP was the first, and remains the only, professional journal dedicated to improving multidisciplinary clinical practice and expanding research evidence specific to both cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation. This includes exercise testing and prescription, behavioral medicine, and cardiopulmonary risk factor management. In 2007, JCRP expanded its scope to include primary prevention of cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. JCRP publishes scientific and clinical peer-reviewed Original Investigations, Reviews, and Brief or Case Reports focused on the causes, prevention, and treatment of individuals with cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases in both a print and online-only format. Editorial features include Editorials, Invited Commentaries, Literature Updates, and Clinically-relevant Topical Updates. JCRP is the official Journal of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation.