服从与改革:托克维尔关于监狱的理论著作

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
F. Gallino
{"title":"服从与改革:托克维尔关于监狱的理论著作","authors":"F. Gallino","doi":"10.3138/TTR.40.1.213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Tocqueville's writings on prison discipline have often been underestimated by specialists. Nevertheless, they have a significant theoretical value and are tightly linked to their author's more renowned works. While comparing the two U.S. \"penitentiary systems\" of Auburn and Philadelphia—a comparison critics have long eluded due to a subtle interpretative oversight—Tocqueville poses a theoretical question: how can inmates' attitudes be durably modified by prison organization? In struggling to answer it—as this paper argues— Tocqueville investigates the relationship between habit, mutual communication, abdicative tendencies and individuals' \"taste\" for freedom, thus developing a set of anthropological insights that would later play a crucial role in his social and political thought.","PeriodicalId":41972,"journal":{"name":"Tocqueville Review","volume":"40 1","pages":"213 - 233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obedience and Reform: Tocqueville's Writings on Prison as Theoretical Works\",\"authors\":\"F. Gallino\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/TTR.40.1.213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Tocqueville's writings on prison discipline have often been underestimated by specialists. Nevertheless, they have a significant theoretical value and are tightly linked to their author's more renowned works. While comparing the two U.S. \\\"penitentiary systems\\\" of Auburn and Philadelphia—a comparison critics have long eluded due to a subtle interpretative oversight—Tocqueville poses a theoretical question: how can inmates' attitudes be durably modified by prison organization? In struggling to answer it—as this paper argues— Tocqueville investigates the relationship between habit, mutual communication, abdicative tendencies and individuals' \\\"taste\\\" for freedom, thus developing a set of anthropological insights that would later play a crucial role in his social and political thought.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tocqueville Review\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"213 - 233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tocqueville Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/TTR.40.1.213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tocqueville Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/TTR.40.1.213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:托克维尔关于监狱纪律的著作经常被专家低估。然而,它们具有重要的理论价值,并与作者更著名的作品紧密相连。托克维尔在比较奥本和费城这两个美国“监狱系统”时提出了一个理论问题:监狱组织如何持久地改变囚犯的态度?正如本文所说,在努力回答这个问题的过程中,托克维尔调查了习惯、相互交流、退让倾向和个人对自由的“品味”之间的关系,从而形成了一套人类学见解,这些见解后来在他的社会和政治思想中发挥了至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obedience and Reform: Tocqueville's Writings on Prison as Theoretical Works
Abstract:Tocqueville's writings on prison discipline have often been underestimated by specialists. Nevertheless, they have a significant theoretical value and are tightly linked to their author's more renowned works. While comparing the two U.S. "penitentiary systems" of Auburn and Philadelphia—a comparison critics have long eluded due to a subtle interpretative oversight—Tocqueville poses a theoretical question: how can inmates' attitudes be durably modified by prison organization? In struggling to answer it—as this paper argues— Tocqueville investigates the relationship between habit, mutual communication, abdicative tendencies and individuals' "taste" for freedom, thus developing a set of anthropological insights that would later play a crucial role in his social and political thought.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tocqueville Review
Tocqueville Review POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信