从《欧洲人权公约》看波兰宪法法庭危机

IF 1.6 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
M. Szwed
{"title":"从《欧洲人权公约》看波兰宪法法庭危机","authors":"M. Szwed","doi":"10.1017/S1574019622000050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" This case note analyses the judgment issued by the European Court of Human Rights on 7 May 2021 in Application No. 4907/18, Xero Flor w Polsce sp. z o.o. v Poland. 1 In this judgment, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the participation of an unlawfully elected person on the panel of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal that discontinued proceedings on the constitutional complaint fi led by a private applicant led to a violation of Article 6 of the ECHR. The Strasbourg Court ’ s judgment is of fundamental importance for several reasons. First, it clari fi ed the scope of applicability of Article 6 to constitutional courts and contributed to the Court ’ s case law on the right to a tribunal established by law, which has been developing rapidly since the landmark ruling in Ástráðsson v Iceland.","PeriodicalId":45815,"journal":{"name":"European Constitutional Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Polish Constitutional Tribunal Crisis from the Perspective of the European Convention on Human Rights\",\"authors\":\"M. Szwed\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1574019622000050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\" This case note analyses the judgment issued by the European Court of Human Rights on 7 May 2021 in Application No. 4907/18, Xero Flor w Polsce sp. z o.o. v Poland. 1 In this judgment, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the participation of an unlawfully elected person on the panel of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal that discontinued proceedings on the constitutional complaint fi led by a private applicant led to a violation of Article 6 of the ECHR. The Strasbourg Court ’ s judgment is of fundamental importance for several reasons. First, it clari fi ed the scope of applicability of Article 6 to constitutional courts and contributed to the Court ’ s case law on the right to a tribunal established by law, which has been developing rapidly since the landmark ruling in Ástráðsson v Iceland.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Constitutional Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Constitutional Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019622000050\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Constitutional Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019622000050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这种情况下注意分析判断欧洲人权法庭发布的2021年5月7日申请4907/18号鑫元鸿福罗w Polsce sp.是一家v波兰。1在这个判断,欧洲人权法院裁定一个非法当选人的参与小组的波兰宪法法庭中止诉讼的宪法诉讼fi为首的一个私人申请人导致ECHR的违反第六条。出于几个原因,斯特拉斯堡法院的判决具有根本性的重要性。首先,它明确了第6条对宪法法院的适用范围,并对法院关于依法设立法庭的权利的判例法作出了贡献,自Ástráðsson诉冰岛一案具有里程碑意义的裁决以来,这一判例法得到了迅速发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Polish Constitutional Tribunal Crisis from the Perspective of the European Convention on Human Rights
 This case note analyses the judgment issued by the European Court of Human Rights on 7 May 2021 in Application No. 4907/18, Xero Flor w Polsce sp. z o.o. v Poland. 1 In this judgment, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the participation of an unlawfully elected person on the panel of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal that discontinued proceedings on the constitutional complaint fi led by a private applicant led to a violation of Article 6 of the ECHR. The Strasbourg Court ’ s judgment is of fundamental importance for several reasons. First, it clari fi ed the scope of applicability of Article 6 to constitutional courts and contributed to the Court ’ s case law on the right to a tribunal established by law, which has been developing rapidly since the landmark ruling in Ástráðsson v Iceland.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), a peer reviewed English language journal, is a platform for advancing the study of European constitutional law, its history and evolution. Its scope is European law and constitutional law, history and theory, comparative law and jurisprudence. Published triannually, it contains articles on doctrine, scholarship and history, plus jurisprudence and book reviews. However, the premier issue includes more than twenty short articles by leading experts, each addressing a single topic in the Draft Constitutional Treaty for Europe. EuConst is addressed at academics, professionals, politicians and others involved or interested in the European constitutional process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信