关于新闻报道的偏见,推特上的评论说明了什么?评估新闻文章偏见对其在Twitter上的看法的影响

Q1 Social Sciences
Timo Spinde , Elisabeth Richter , Martin Wessel , Juhi Kulshrestha , Karsten Donnay
{"title":"关于新闻报道的偏见,推特上的评论说明了什么?评估新闻文章偏见对其在Twitter上的看法的影响","authors":"Timo Spinde ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Richter ,&nbsp;Martin Wessel ,&nbsp;Juhi Kulshrestha ,&nbsp;Karsten Donnay","doi":"10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>News stories circulating online, especially on social media platforms, are nowadays a primary source of information. Given the nature of social media, news no longer are just news, but they are embedded in the conversations of users interacting with them. This is particularly relevant for inaccurate information or even outright misinformation because user interaction has a crucial impact on whether information is uncritically disseminated or not. Biased coverage has been shown to affect personal decision-making. Still, it remains an open question whether users are aware of the biased reporting they encounter and how they react to it. The latter is particularly relevant given that user reactions help contextualize reporting for other users and can thus help mitigate but may also exacerbate the impact of biased media coverage.</p><p>This paper approaches the question from a measurement point of view, examining whether reactions to news articles on Twitter can serve as bias indicators, i.e., whether how users comment on a given article relates to its actual level of bias. We first give an overview of research on media bias before discussing key concepts related to how individuals engage with online content, focusing on the sentiment (or valance) of comments and on outright hate speech. We then present the first dataset connecting reliable human-made media bias classifications of news articles with the reactions these articles received on Twitter. We call our dataset BAT - <strong>B</strong>ias <strong>A</strong>nd <strong>T</strong>witter. BAT covers 2,800 (bias-rated) news articles from 255 English-speaking news outlets. Additionally, BAT includes 175,807 comments and retweets referring to the articles.</p><p>Based on BAT, we conduct a multi-feature analysis to identify comment characteristics and analyze whether Twitter reactions correlate with an article’s bias. First, we fine-tune and apply two XLNet-based classifiers for hate speech detection and sentiment analysis. Second, we relate the results of the classifiers to the article bias annotations within a multi-level regression. The results show that Twitter reactions to an article indicate its bias, and vice-versa. With a regression coefficient of 0.703 (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>01</mn></mrow></math></span>), we specifically present evidence that Twitter reactions to biased articles are significantly more hateful. Our analysis shows that the news outlet’s individual stance reinforces the hate-bias relationship. In future work, we will extend the dataset and analysis, including additional concepts related to media bias.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52228,"journal":{"name":"Online Social Networks and Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What do Twitter comments tell about news article bias? Assessing the impact of news article bias on its perception on Twitter\",\"authors\":\"Timo Spinde ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Richter ,&nbsp;Martin Wessel ,&nbsp;Juhi Kulshrestha ,&nbsp;Karsten Donnay\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>News stories circulating online, especially on social media platforms, are nowadays a primary source of information. Given the nature of social media, news no longer are just news, but they are embedded in the conversations of users interacting with them. This is particularly relevant for inaccurate information or even outright misinformation because user interaction has a crucial impact on whether information is uncritically disseminated or not. Biased coverage has been shown to affect personal decision-making. Still, it remains an open question whether users are aware of the biased reporting they encounter and how they react to it. The latter is particularly relevant given that user reactions help contextualize reporting for other users and can thus help mitigate but may also exacerbate the impact of biased media coverage.</p><p>This paper approaches the question from a measurement point of view, examining whether reactions to news articles on Twitter can serve as bias indicators, i.e., whether how users comment on a given article relates to its actual level of bias. We first give an overview of research on media bias before discussing key concepts related to how individuals engage with online content, focusing on the sentiment (or valance) of comments and on outright hate speech. We then present the first dataset connecting reliable human-made media bias classifications of news articles with the reactions these articles received on Twitter. We call our dataset BAT - <strong>B</strong>ias <strong>A</strong>nd <strong>T</strong>witter. BAT covers 2,800 (bias-rated) news articles from 255 English-speaking news outlets. Additionally, BAT includes 175,807 comments and retweets referring to the articles.</p><p>Based on BAT, we conduct a multi-feature analysis to identify comment characteristics and analyze whether Twitter reactions correlate with an article’s bias. First, we fine-tune and apply two XLNet-based classifiers for hate speech detection and sentiment analysis. Second, we relate the results of the classifiers to the article bias annotations within a multi-level regression. The results show that Twitter reactions to an article indicate its bias, and vice-versa. With a regression coefficient of 0.703 (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>01</mn></mrow></math></span>), we specifically present evidence that Twitter reactions to biased articles are significantly more hateful. Our analysis shows that the news outlet’s individual stance reinforces the hate-bias relationship. In future work, we will extend the dataset and analysis, including additional concepts related to media bias.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online Social Networks and Media\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online Social Networks and Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246869642300023X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Social Networks and Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246869642300023X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,在网上,尤其是在社交媒体平台上流传的新闻故事是信息的主要来源。鉴于社交媒体的性质,新闻不再仅仅是新闻,而是嵌入到与之互动的用户的对话中。这与不准确的信息甚至完全错误的信息特别相关,因为用户交互对信息是否被不加批判地传播具有至关重要的影响。有偏见的报道已被证明会影响个人决策。然而,用户是否意识到他们遇到的有偏见的报道,以及他们如何应对,这仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。后者尤其重要,因为用户的反应有助于为其他用户提供报道的背景,从而有助于减轻但也可能加剧有偏见的媒体报道的影响。本文从测量的角度来探讨这个问题,研究Twitter上对新闻文章的反应是否可以作为偏见指标,即用户对给定文章的评论是否与其实际的偏见水平有关。我们首先概述了媒体偏见的研究,然后讨论了与个人如何参与在线内容相关的关键概念,重点关注评论的情绪(或价值)和直接的仇恨言论。然后,我们提出了第一个数据集,将新闻文章的可靠的人为媒体偏见分类与这些文章在Twitter上收到的反应联系起来。我们称我们的数据集为BAT——偏见和推特。BAT涵盖了来自255个英语新闻媒体的2,800篇(偏见评级)新闻文章。此外,BAT还收录了175,807条评论和转发。基于BAT,我们进行了多特征分析,以识别评论特征,并分析Twitter反应是否与文章的偏见相关。首先,我们对两个基于xlnet的分类器进行微调并应用于仇恨言论检测和情感分析。其次,我们将分类器的结果与多层次回归中的文章偏见注释联系起来。结果表明,Twitter对一篇文章的反应表明了它的偏见,反之亦然。回归系数为0.703 (p<0.01),我们特别提出证据表明Twitter对有偏见文章的反应明显更可恶。我们的分析表明,新闻媒体的个人立场强化了仇恨-偏见关系。在未来的工作中,我们将扩展数据集和分析,包括与媒体偏见相关的其他概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What do Twitter comments tell about news article bias? Assessing the impact of news article bias on its perception on Twitter

News stories circulating online, especially on social media platforms, are nowadays a primary source of information. Given the nature of social media, news no longer are just news, but they are embedded in the conversations of users interacting with them. This is particularly relevant for inaccurate information or even outright misinformation because user interaction has a crucial impact on whether information is uncritically disseminated or not. Biased coverage has been shown to affect personal decision-making. Still, it remains an open question whether users are aware of the biased reporting they encounter and how they react to it. The latter is particularly relevant given that user reactions help contextualize reporting for other users and can thus help mitigate but may also exacerbate the impact of biased media coverage.

This paper approaches the question from a measurement point of view, examining whether reactions to news articles on Twitter can serve as bias indicators, i.e., whether how users comment on a given article relates to its actual level of bias. We first give an overview of research on media bias before discussing key concepts related to how individuals engage with online content, focusing on the sentiment (or valance) of comments and on outright hate speech. We then present the first dataset connecting reliable human-made media bias classifications of news articles with the reactions these articles received on Twitter. We call our dataset BAT - Bias And Twitter. BAT covers 2,800 (bias-rated) news articles from 255 English-speaking news outlets. Additionally, BAT includes 175,807 comments and retweets referring to the articles.

Based on BAT, we conduct a multi-feature analysis to identify comment characteristics and analyze whether Twitter reactions correlate with an article’s bias. First, we fine-tune and apply two XLNet-based classifiers for hate speech detection and sentiment analysis. Second, we relate the results of the classifiers to the article bias annotations within a multi-level regression. The results show that Twitter reactions to an article indicate its bias, and vice-versa. With a regression coefficient of 0.703 (p<0.01), we specifically present evidence that Twitter reactions to biased articles are significantly more hateful. Our analysis shows that the news outlet’s individual stance reinforces the hate-bias relationship. In future work, we will extend the dataset and analysis, including additional concepts related to media bias.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Online Social Networks and Media
Online Social Networks and Media Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
44 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信