超越自由民主：多样化的教育关系

Q4 Social Sciences

Philosophical Inquiry in Education Pub Date : 2020-10-28 DOI:10.7202/1072682AR

B. Thayer-bacon

{"title":"超越自由民主：多样化的教育关系","authors":"B. Thayer-bacon","doi":"10.7202/1072682AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay offers a critical analysis of Locke's and Rousseau's basic assumptions upon which classical liberalism is built: rationalism, universalism, and individualism. I then describe an alternative starting place for democracy with a transactional view of individuals-in-relation-to-others. I then offer specific educational examples to help me sketch two themes that illustrate problems with classical liberalism and how a transactional democracy-always-in-the-making can help to solve these problems.","PeriodicalId":36151,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","volume":"15 1","pages":"79-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Liberal Democracy: Diverse Educational Relations\",\"authors\":\"B. Thayer-bacon\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1072682AR\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay offers a critical analysis of Locke's and Rousseau's basic assumptions upon which classical liberalism is built: rationalism, universalism, and individualism. I then describe an alternative starting place for democracy with a transactional view of individuals-in-relation-to-others. I then offer specific educational examples to help me sketch two themes that illustrate problems with classical liberalism and how a transactional democracy-always-in-the-making can help to solve these problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Inquiry in Education\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"79-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Inquiry in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1072682AR\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1072682AR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对洛克和卢梭建立古典自由主义的基本假设进行了批判性分析：理性主义、普遍主义和个人主义。然后，我用个人与他人关系的交易观点来描述民主的另一个起点。然后，我提供了具体的教育例子，帮助我勾勒出两个主题，说明古典自由主义的问题，以及一个始终在形成中的交易型民主如何帮助解决这些问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Beyond Liberal Democracy: Diverse Educational Relations

This essay offers a critical analysis of Locke's and Rousseau's basic assumptions upon which classical liberalism is built: rationalism, universalism, and individualism. I then describe an alternative starting place for democracy with a transactional view of individuals-in-relation-to-others. I then offer specific educational examples to help me sketch two themes that illustrate problems with classical liberalism and how a transactional democracy-always-in-the-making can help to solve these problems.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Philosophical Inquiry in Education Social Sciences-Education

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

20 weeks